Cited by 104Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Brief coping skills treatment for cocaine abuse: substance use outcomes at three months

MONTI, PETER M., ROHSENOW, DAMARIS J., MICHALEC, ELIZABETH, MARTIN, ROSEMARIE A., ABRAMS, DAVID B.·1997·Addiction

Abstract

Aims. Coping skills training, a promising treatment approach for alcoholics, was adapted for use with cocaine abusers and effects on outcome were investigated. Design. A cocaine‐specific coping skills training (CST) package was compared to an attention placebo control when both were added to a comprehensive treatment program. Setting. The sites were two private substance abuse treatment facilities, one residential and rural, and one an urban partial hospital. Participants. Substance abusers in treatment with cocaine abuse or dependence were selected. Intervention. The CST intervention was conducted in individual sessions. It involved functional analysis of high risk situations and coping skills training based on the functional analysis. Findings. Clients who received CST had significantly fewer cocaine use days and the length of their longest binge was significantly shorter during the 3‐month follow‐up period compared to clients in the control condition. CST did not affect relapse rates or use of other substances. Conclusions. Results support the notion that cocaine‐specific CST is a promising adjunct to treatment for cocaine abusers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02892.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MONTI, P. M., ROHSENOW, D. J., MICHALEC, E., MARTIN, R. A., & ABRAMS, D. B.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
ROHSENOW, DAMARIS J.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-12
Volume
92
Issue
12
Pages
1717-1728
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1980279285
Cited by
104
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Office of Research and Development
  • Hope Center for Neurological Disorders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da004859-09)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (1RO1 DA 04859)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cocaine abuse, cocaine dependence, coping skills training, functional analysis, brief intervention, adjunct treatment, binge drinking, relapse, substance use outcomes
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cocaine, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Rural Health, Urban Health, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review