Cited by 59Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth disparities and outcomes

How effective are the English smoking treatment services in reaching disadvantaged smokers?

Chesterman, John, Judge, Ken, Bauld, Linda, Ferguson, Janet·2005·Addiction

Abstract

Aims To determine the effectiveness of smoking cessation services in enabling smokers living in disadvantaged areas to access treatment services, and to assess the extent of variations between areas. Design Observational study of administrative information linked with survey data. Setting A representative sample of 19 of the 95 English health areas in 2001. Measurements All England smoking data by deprivation category obtained from the Health Survey of England were used to estimate neighbourhood smoking prevalence rates. Area of residence data from smokers setting a quit date were used to calculate the proportion of smokers in receipt of treatment services in different economic deprivation categories. Findings In general, treatment services were seeing smokers from the most disadvantaged areas where smoking prevalence rates were highest; 32.3% of all smokers in receipt of treatment services lived in the most disadvantaged quintile of areas compared with 9.6% resident in the most advantaged quintile. An indicator of ‘positive discrimination’ was calculated for each health authority area to quantify the extent to which the proportion of disadvantaged smokers being treated was greater than the proportion in the local population. This figure ranged from just under 0% to 18%. Conclusions National Health Service (NHS) smoking cessation services have been successful in reaching smokers from disadvantaged communities. If improved access to support for smokers living in the poorest communities can be extended, sustained and translated into long‐term quitting then smoking cessation services have the potential to make a useful contribution to addressing inequalities in health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01026.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A previous national evaluation of NHS Stop Smoking Services in England found that the services were effective in supporting smokers to quit in the short term (at 4 weeks) and the longer term (at 1 year), and were reaching smokers from more deprived groups.

    “The evaluation found that the services were effective in supporting smokers to quit in the short term (at 4 weeks) 17 and the longer term (at 1 year), 18 and were reaching smokers from more deprived groups.19”
  • Although SSSs are able to reach significant numbers of smokers living in disadvantaged areas, these smokers face additional barriers to quitting.

    “Thus, although SSSs are able to reach significant numbers of smokers living in disadvantaged areas, 19 these smokers face additional barriers to quitting.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chesterman, J., Judge, K., Bauld, L., & Ferguson, J.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Judge, Ken
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-07
Volume
100
Issue
s2
Pages
36-45
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1985027106
Cited by
59
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
smoking cessation services, health disparities, socioeconomic deprivation, access to treatment, affirmative action, National Health Service
MeSH terms
Adult, England, Humans, Patient Compliance, Preventive Health Services, Socioeconomic Factors, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review