Cited by 53Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Dependence potential of nicotine replacement treatments: effects of product type, patient characteristics, and cost to user

Hajek, Peter, McRobbie, Hayden, Gillison, Fiona·2007·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objective To assess the extent of long-term use of different nicotine replacement treatment products in smokers attending routine smoking cessation treatment and to examine the effect of nicotine replacement treatment cost on its long-term use.Method 1518 consecutive patients prescribed nicotine replacement treatment at the East London Smokers' Clinic between January 2000 and November 2002 were followed up at 1-year.Results The rates of long-term use ranged from 2% for patch to 13% for nasal spray. Long-term use of nicotine replacement treatment was significantly more likely in more dependent smokers. Treatment cost, and whether it was provided free of charge, had no significant effect on its long-term use.Conclusions Long-term use of nicotine replacement treatment is not uncommon. Its occurrence seems positively related to speed of nicotine delivery of individual products. For self-selected highly dependent smokers, long-term use of nicotine replacement treatment may be a necessary precondition for maintaining long-term abstinence. The findings have financial and clinical implications for providers of smoking cessation services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.10.005

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hajek, P., McRobbie, H., & Gillison, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
McRobbie, Hayden
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
230-234
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138725833
Cited by
52
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
nicotine replacement therapy, long-term use, nicotine dependence, smoking cessation, nicotine patch, nicotine nasal spray, treatment costs, smoking abstinence, patient characteristics
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Administration, Cutaneous, Administration, Intranasal, Administration, Sublingual, Adult, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, London, Male, Middle Aged, Nicotine, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Tobacco Use Disorder, Program Evaluation, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review