The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 48 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls
Open accessAbstract
Aims Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling have relevance for the aetiology and treatment of this disorder, yet are poorly understood. This study therefore investigated neurocognitive impairments of executive functions in a group of carefully screened Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version IV (DSM‐IV‐TR) pathological gamblers. Performance was compared to a group of normal control participants. To study the specificity of these neurocognitive deficits, a substance dependence group (alcohol dependence) and an impulse control disorder group (Tourette syndrome) were included. Design Cross‐sectional study. Setting Addiction and general mental health treatment centres. Participants Forty‐nine pathological gamblers, 48 abstinent alcohol‐dependent patients, 46 participants with Tourette syndrome and 49 normal control participants. Measurements A comprehensive neuropsychological battery measuring executive functions as well as basic cognitive functions. Findings Both the pathological gambling and the alcohol dependent groups were characterized by diminished performance on inhibition, time estimation, cognitive flexibility and planning tasks. The Tourette syndrome group showed deficits only on inhibition tasks. Basic cognitive functions were intact in all clinical groups. Comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, antisocial personality disorder and nicotine dependence influenced the impaired functions of the clinical groups only minimally. Conclusions Carefully screened groups of pathological gamblers and alcohol dependents were characterized by diminished executive functioning, suggesting a dysfunction of frontal lobe circuitry in these disorders. The resemblance between the pathological gambling group and the alcohol dependence group suggests a common neurocognitive aetiology for these disorders. Psychosocial treatment of these disorders could benefit from assessing and targeting deficits in executive functions, as they probably influence the course of these disorders negatively.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
27 Own result · 26 Not checked yet · 19 Own interpretation · 11 Own method
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pairwise group comparisons revealed slower SSRTs for the PG group, the AD group and the TS group compared to the NC group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Inhibition
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The PG group named fewer correct words than the NC group, the AD group and the TS group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Cognitive flexibility
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The AD group made more perseverations compared to the NC group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Cognitive flexibility
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, anxiety and depression scores did not correlate with performance on the EF measures (all correlations: r < 0.15).”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Co-morbidity analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the SOGS scores correlated strongly with anxiety and depression (r = 0.42 and r = 0.43, respectively, P < 0.01)”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Co-morbidity analyses
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A similar difference was found when comparing the AD group to the NC group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Planning
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the PG group, lower beta value correct scores were found than in the NC group and the TS group, indicating a stronger decrease of scores with increasing difficulty level in the PG group than in the NC group and the TS group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Planning
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pairwise comparisons on the time estimation task revealed that both the PG and the AD group had higher absolute discrepancy scores, and thus showed less accurate time estimations compared to the NC group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Time estimation and reproduction
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For one of the three inhibition measures, the significant group difference between the PG and NC group became marginally significant (SSRT, P = 0.05).”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Co-morbidity analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the WCST, no group differences existed for the percentage of perseverative errors.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Cognitive flexibility
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 19
- Probably not a substantial claim. 17
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the Time Reproduction Task, no main effects of group or group by time length interactions were found.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Time estimation and reproduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data were re-analysed excluding participants with ADHD and/or antisocial personality disorder diagnoses.Results for all omnibus tests and pairwise group comparisons remained the same.However, two exceptions should be noted.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Co-morbidity analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared to the NC group, the PG group, the AD group and the TS group reported higher levels of ADHD symptoms (ADHD questionnaire), anxiety (STAI) and depression (BDI).”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Mean age, gender distributions, estimated IQ, scores on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, the ADHD questionnaire, the Trait version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the severity of PG in our study was comparable to the severity of PG as reported in a study including pathological gamblers who did not seek treatment, as the SOGS scores in our study were similar to the SOGS scores reported in that study [90].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eight participants were diagnosed with either ADHD inattentive subtype and/or ADHD hyperactive-impulsive subtype (see Table 1).”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Co-morbidity analyses
plainn = 8- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, a broad range of EF deficits was found in a carefully screened PG and AD group, whereas in a TS group only inhibition deficits were present.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“All subjects who were included in the TS group were diagnosed previously with TS by a psychiatrist or neurologist.”
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
“Severity of current and past verbal and motor tics was assessed with the Dutch version of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) [45].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Selection criteria and screening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
In the paper
“Several studies suggest that mild dysfunctions in EFs mediate the enhanced risk for later development of substance and alcohol dependence in children with a familial risk for developing substance dependence [92][93][94].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92][93][94]
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The most important reason for these inconsistencies concerns methodological limitations: some studies targeted only a single EF, most studies were restricted to small groups and studies often failed to assess and control for comorbid disorders and medication use.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“In addition, most studies did not investigate whether deficits in EFs were independent of deficits in basic cognitive functions.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“Finally, the specificity of EF deficits in PG is not known, because clinical comparison groups were not included in most of these studies.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
In the paper
“In contrast, research into EFs in PG is scarce, and findings are inconsistent (for a review see [26]).”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exclusion criteria for all groups were: (1) (a history of) substance abuse or dependence (section L of the Dutch CIDI)-except for alcohol abuse and dependence in the AD group; (2) (a history of) major psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, psychotic episodes or hospitalization for psychiatric disorders; (3) current treatment for mental disorders other than those under study in this”
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
“(5) the use of psychotropic medication which could not be discontinued; (6) having another language than Dutch as first language; (7) age over 60 or under 18 years; (8) positive urine screen for alcohol, cannabis or benzodiazepines.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Selection criteria and screening
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
In the paper
“EFs rely on an intact functioning of the prefrontal cortex and subcortico-cortical networks projecting to the prefrontal cortex, such as basal ganglia-thalamic and parietal networks [9][10][11].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9][10][11]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results can therefore not be generalized to female pathological gamblers, or to adolescent pathological gamblers.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to the low numbers of pathological gamblers with ADHD or ASP included in our study, it was not possible to investigate whether pathological gamblers with other comorbid disorders would have more serious EF deficits.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and abnormalities in brain structures and functions involved in EFs are present [21,24,25].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This study was approved by the Amsterdam Medical Centre Local Ethical Committee and written informed consent was given by all participants before testing.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Procedure
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The PG participants were diagnosed according to DSM-IV-TR PG criteria, using the Dutch version of section T of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) [40].”
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
“In order to be included in the study as a pathological gambler, at least five of the defining criteria had to be present currently or recently, i.e. up to 4 weeks prior to the assessment.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Selection criteria and screening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Diminished neurocognitive functions are proposed both as vulnerability factors for developing substance dependence and as the result of extraneous drugs on brain functions [12,91].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MANOVAs were performed at the domain levels (inhibition, time estimation and reproduction, cognitive flexibility, working memory, planning and non-EF basic cognitive tasks).Pairwise Bonferroni corrected group comparisons (PG-NC, PG-AD, PG-TS, AD-NC and TS-NC) were performed only when main effects of group or group × factor interactions were significant at the P < 0.05 level.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Statistical analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AD participants were diagnosed according to DSM-IV-TR AD criteria with section J of the Dutch version of the Clinical International Diagnostic Inventory (CIDI [43]).”
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
“A minimum Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 25 was required in order to exclude AD patients with severe cognitive impairment, such as alcohol-related dementia [44].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Selection criteria and screening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43]
- Not checked yetcites [44] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because the AD group differed significantly in terms of age from the other groups, age was entered as a covariate in all analyses.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Statistical analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The findings of diminished cognitive flexibility functions in PG compared to normal controls in our study are consistent with findings of two studies in PG, one employing the WCST [73] and one using a Verbal Fluency Task [74], but are inconsistent with a study that reported no impairments on the WCST in a smaller PG group [80].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our sample consisted of an adult sample of predominantly male pathological gamblers.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adding administration order as a factor in the MANOVAs affected only performance on the Digit Span Backwards task ( P < 0.01).Administration order was therefore entered as a covariate in the working memory analyses.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Statistical analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of excluded and missing data ranged from zero to five in each group, resulting in zero to nine missing cases for each analysis.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Statistical analysis
plainn = 9- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Deficits in EFs are proposed as important mediators in drug bingeing [15]”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Treatment of PG and AD may benefit from interventions targeting these EF dysfunctions.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The EF deficits as found in PG as well as AD in this study may therefore foster the continuation of these disorders, limit the impact of psychosocial treatment and promote relapse after discontinuation of PG or AD.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Several DSM-IV-TR criteria for pathological gambling resemble those of substance dependence, including loss of control, tolerance, withdrawal and negative consequences.
“Several DSM-IV-TR criteria for PG resemble those of substance dependence, such as loss of control, tolerance, withdrawal and the experience of negative consequences due to the gambling-related behaviour”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pathological gambling, substance dependence and impulse control disorders share behavioural deficits in self-regulation, manifested as an impaired ability to inhibit the urge for the desired behaviour or drug.
“these disorders are all characterized by behavioural deficits in self-regulation, as manifested in an impaired ability to inhibit the urge for the desired behaviour or drug.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Executive function deficits probably influence the course of pathological gambling and alcohol dependence negatively.
“as they probably influence the course of these disorders negatively.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“SSRT is prolonged in chronic cocaine users [51], chronic methamphetamine users [52] and alcohol-dependent subjects [48], compared with normal control subjects, suggesting a response-inhibition deficit.”
From Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Abstract
“Forty-nine pathological gamblers, 48 abstinent alcohol-dependent patients, 46 participants with Tourette syndrome and 49 normal control participants.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Final sample
“The final sample contained 49 pathological gamblers, 48 alcohol dependants, abstinent for a period of 3-12 months, 46 TS patients and 50 normal controls.”
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/springerreference_121117 · Cited by 20,772
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire
HEATHERTON, T. F., KOZLOWSKI, L. T., FRECKER, R. C., & FAGERSTROM, K. (1991) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x · Cited by 10,738
MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1835 · Cited by 3,666
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual – Revised and Expanded
Heaton, R. K., Chelune, C., Talley, J., Kay, G., & Curtiss, G. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,975
(1987) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.144.9.1184 · Cited by 2,948
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Robins L., 1998, Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM‐IV
- World Health Organisation, 1997, Composite International Diagnostic Interview
- Van der Ploeg H. M., 1980, Validity of the Zelf‐Beoordelings‐Vragenlijst [Dutch version of the Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory], Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor de Psychologie En Haar Grensgebieden, 35, 243
- Hammes J. W., 1971, De Stroop Kleur–Woord Test Handleiding [the Stroop Colour–Word Test: Manual]
- Heaton R. K., 1981, A Manual for the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
- Luteijn F., 1983, Handleiding Groninger Intelligentietest (GIT) [Manual Groningen Intelligence Test]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 468
Wegmann, E., Brand, M., Snagowski, J., & Schiebener, J. (2016) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2016.1201461 · Cited by 11
Schluter, R. S., van Holst, R. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2018) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1759-y · Cited by 10
Self-citationInnovative Treatment Approaches in Gambling Disorder
Snippe, L., Boffo, M., Stewart, S. H., Dom, G., & Wiers, R. W. H. J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03060-5_10 · Cited by 10
Pérez, E. J. P., López‐Durán, A., & Arroyo, Á. O. (2010) · Cited by 10
Automatic and Controlled Processes in the Pathway from Drug Abuse to Addiction
Field, M., & Wiers, R. W. H. J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3375-0_3 · Cited by 10
Wass, S. V., Clackson, K., & Leong, V. (2018) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.12243 · Cited by 10
A Family Study of Trauma and Coping Strategies in Gambling Disorder
Goghari, V. M., Shakeel, M. K., Swan, J. L., Kim, H. S. A., Sharif-Razi, M., & Hodgins, D. C. (2020) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-020-09963-0 · Cited by 10
Kusui, Y., Izuo, N., Reika, T., Asano, T., & Nitta, A. (2024) · Journal of Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jphs.2023.12.003 · Cited by 10
Palomäki, J., Castrén, S., Männikkö, N., & Latvala, T. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1529051 · Cited by 9
Glücksspiel im Gehirn: Neurobiologische Grundlagen pathologischen Glücksspielens
Mörsen, C. P., Heinz, A., Fauth‐Bühler, M., & Mann, K. F. (2011) · SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice · doi:10.1024/0939-5911.a000121 · Cited by 9
Differential profiles of cognitive and behavioral inflexibility in addictive disorders
Lim, T. V., & Ersche, K. D. (2024) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101402 · Cited by 11
Paz, A. L., Rosselli, M., & Conniff, J. (2018) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.13830 · Cited by 9
Miller, A. P., Gizer, I. R., Fleming, W., Otto, J. M., Deak, J. D., Martins, J. S., & Bartholow, B. D. (2019) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.025 · Cited by 9
Influences of Parental Problem Drinking on Internet Addiction Among Early Adolescents
Jang, M. H., Kim, M. J., & Choi, H. (2012) · Journal of Addictions Nursing · doi:10.1097/jan.0b013e31826f69ac · Cited by 9
Gambling Disorder and Substance-Related Disorders: Similarities and Differences
Goudriaan, A. E., van den Brink, W., & van Holst, R. J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03060-5_12 · Cited by 10
Self-citationExploring the interplay between addiction and time perception: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gu, Y., Shan, J., Huang, T., Yu, C., Wu, H., Hu, X., Tong, X., Jia, R., Noda, Y., Du, J., et al. (2024) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111104 · Cited by 8
Alcohol and Gambling Addiction
Martinac, M., Karlović, D., & Babić, D. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813125-1.00054-4 · Cited by 8
Scalzo, F., O’Connor, D. A., Orr, C., Murphy, K., & Hester, R. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00429 · Cited by 8
Qureshi, A., Monk, R. L., Pennington, C. R., Li, X., Leatherbarrow, T., & Oulton, J. (2018) · Adicciones · doi:10.20882/adicciones.1091 · Cited by 8
Kim, H. S. A., & Hodgins, D. C. (2019) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-019-00256-0 · Cited by 8
Ferariu, A., Taylor, A., Chang, H., & Zhang, F. (2024) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.15393 · Cited by 7
Alcoolismo e Avaliação de Funções Executivas: Uma Revisão Sistemática
Rigoni, M. D. S., Susin, N., Trentini, C. M., & Oliveira, M. D. S. (2013) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 7
Impulsiveness and Inhibitory Mechanisms
Bari, A., Kellermann, T. S., & Studer, B. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800935-2.00006-3 · Cited by 11
A Preliminary Comparison of Cannabis Use in Subsyndromal Gamblers
Leppink, E. W., Derbyshire, K. L., Chamberlain, S. R., & Grant, J. E. (2014) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000000079 · Cited by 7
Stopping Manual and Vocal Actions in Tourette’s Syndrome
Wylie, S. A., Claassen, D. O., Kanoff, K. E., van Wouwe, N. C., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2016) · Journal of Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.15110387 · Cited by 7
Mayhew, M. J., Byrne, J., Powell, J., & Meynen, T. (2020) · Alcohol · doi:10.1016/j.alcohol.2019.09.007 · Cited by 4
Pathological Gambling: Who Gains from Others’ Losses?
Huberfeld, R., & Dannon, P. N. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0959-9_8 · Cited by 7
Executive Function in Gambling Disorder: A Meta-analysis on Neuropsychological Evidence
Peixoto, M., Dores, A. R., Monteiro, M., Marques, A. J. P. D. S., & Barbosa, F. (2025) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-025-10383-1 · Cited by 8
Relationship of Cryptocurrencies with Gambling and Addiction
Şentürk, E., Çoşar, B., & Arıkan, Z. (2023) · Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry · doi:10.18863/pgy.1127924 · Cited by 9
Neurocognitive Functioning in Tourette Syndrome
Morand‐Beaulieu, S., Stark, D. L., & Murphy, T. L. (2024) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2024.08.005 · Cited by 6
Neuronal and psychological underpinnings of pathological gambling
Singer, B. F., Anselme, P., Robinson, M. J. F., & Vezina, P. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00230 · Cited by 8
Zur Validität des Modells zur psychischen Vulnerabilität der Glücksspielsucht
Vierhaus, M., Ewering, J., Klein, F., Ködding, C., & Petry, J. (2012) · SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice · doi:10.1024/0939-5911.a000183 · Cited by 6
Interference-based methods to mitigate gambling craving: a proof-of-principle pilot study
Cornil, A., Rothen, S., de Timary, P., & Billieux, J. (2021) · International Gambling Studies · doi:10.1080/14459795.2021.1903063 · Cited by 6
Pathological Gambling: Psychiatric Models
Westphal, J. R. (2008) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-008-9166-0 · Cited by 6
The gambling control bill: time for action
OʼGara, C. (2017) · Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/ipm.2017.77 · Cited by 6
Lei, H., Zhong, M., Fan, J., Zhang, X., Cai, L., & Zhu, X. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.063 · Cited by 6
Störungen durch Substanzkonsum: Eine Einführung
Bühringer, G., & Behrendt, S. (2011) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13018-2_33 · Cited by 5
The frontal executive function in exercise addicts, moderate exercisers, and exercise avoiders
Ryu, K., Kim, Y., Kwon, M., Kim, H., & Kim, J. (2016) · American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1111/ajad.12422 · Cited by 5
Neurobiology of Disordered Gambling
Grant, J. E. (2016) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-016-0119-6 · Cited by 4
Pathological Gambling and Nicotine Dependence
Grant, J. E., Black, D. W., Stein, D. J., & Potenza, M. N. (2009) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0b013e3181a1cc36 · Cited by 5
Sleepiness and cognition in young adults who gamble and use alcohol
Harvanko, A. M., Derbyshire, K. L., Schreiber, L. R. N., & Grant, J. E. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/jba.3.2014.014 · Cited by 5
Klinische und forensische Aspekte hypersexuellen Verhaltens
Rettenberger, M., Dekker, A., Klein, V., & Briken, P. (2012) · Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie · doi:10.1007/s11757-012-0194-z · Cited by 6
Pathological Gambling: Clinical Aspects
Grant, J. E., & Odlaug, B. L. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511711930.006 · Cited by 5
Bottesi, G., & Ghisi, M. (2014) · Psychopathology Review · doi:10.5127/pr.032713 · Cited by 6
Recław, R., Chmielowiec, K., Suchanecka, A., Boroń, A., Chmielowiec, J., Strońska-Pluta, A., Kowalski, M. T., Masiak, J., Trybek, G., & Grzywacz, A. (2024) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes15030299 · Cited by 4
Honma, M., Yoshiike, T., Ikeda, H., & Kuriyama, K. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep10362 · Cited by 5
Donati, M. A., Gori, C., & Primi, C. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.133 · Cited by 4
Startle-Response Based Tasks and Laboratory Measures of Impulsivity in Abstinent Alcoholic Patients
Marín, M., Barba, R. J., Ponce, G., Koeneke, A., Martínez‐Gras, I., Jiménez‐Arriero, M. Á., & Rubio, G. (2015) · Alcohol and Alcoholism · doi:10.1093/alcalc/agv006 · Cited by 4
Simulated die-rolling behaviours express illusions of control in regular gamblers
Lim, M. S. M., & Rogers, R. D. (2019) · International Gambling Studies · doi:10.1080/14459795.2019.1652668 · Cited by 4
Liu, Y., van den Wildenberg, W. V. D., Fraga-González, G., Rigoni, D., Brass, M., Wiers, R., & Ridderinkhof, R. (2020) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-019-0367-z · Cited by 5
Neurobiological and neuropsychological pathways into substance abuse and addictive behavior
Yücel, M., Lubman, D. I., Solowij, N., & Brewer, W. J. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511642197.027 · Cited by 4
Helfinstein, S. M., & Poldrack, R. A. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3116 · Cited by 4
DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH TO BEHAVIORAL OR "NON-SUBSTANCE" ADDICTIONS
Şenel, G. B., & Poyraz, C. A. (2014) · Cited by 4
P300 Source Localization Contrasts in Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors and Tic Disorders
Sauvé, G., Morand‐Beaulieu, S., O’Connor, K. P., Blanchet, P. J., & Lavoie, M. E. (2017) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci7070076 · Cited by 4
Neurocognitive Basis of Compulsivity
Figee, M., Luigjes, J., Goudriaan, A. E., Willuhn, I., & Denys, D. A. J. P. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164313.008 · Cited by 4
Self-citationSher, K. J., Winograd, R., & Haeny, A. M. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop208009 · Cited by 4
Rethinking the Approach to Gambling Disorder: The Case of the Italian Healthcare Services
Lombi, L., & Pedroni, M. (2019) · Italian Sociological Review · doi:10.13136/isr.v9i3.265 · Cited by 3
Gavazzi, G., Cavaliere, C., Salvatore, M., Makris, N., & Pallanti, S. (2025) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci15050448 · Cited by 3
Sescousse, G. (2015) · médecine/sciences · doi:10.1051/medsci/20153108018 · Cited by 4
Sebold, M., Hägele, C., Beck, A., & Heinz, A. (2013) · SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice · doi:10.1024/0939-5911.a000255 · Cited by 3
Neuropsychology in GD: old and new directions
Balodis, I. M. (2019) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.002 · Cited by 3
Cognitive Processes Underlying Impaired Decision Making in Gambling Disorder
Brevers, D., Vögele, C., & Billieux, J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45500-2_11 · Cited by 3
Bilevicius, E., Single, A. N., Baumgartner, C., Bui, V. T., Kempe, T., Schaub, M. P., Stewart, S. H., MacKillop, J. M., Hodgins, D. C., Wardell, J. D., et al. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04867-1 · Cited by 4
Internet and Gambling: Insights from Australia’s NBN Rollout
Ackermann, K., Churchill, S. A., & Munyanyi, M. E. (2024) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-024-10352-0 · Cited by 4
Menezes, A., Dias, N. M., & Seabra, A. G. (2011) · Cuadernos de neuropsicología · Cited by 3
Epidemiology and Phenomenology of Pathological Gambling
Clark, L. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195389715.013.0035 · Cited by 3
Pathological Gambling: obsessive-compulsive disorder or behavioral addiction?
Alegría, A. A., Bernardi, S., & Blanco, C. (2010) · Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría · doi:10.1016/s0034-7450(14)60272-9 · Cited by 3
The Personality of Chinese Gamblers
Chan, C. C., Li, W., & Chiu, A. S. (2019) · The Psychology of Chinese Gambling · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3486-3_5 · Cited by 2
Neurobehavioural characteristics and relapse in addiction
Bowden‐Jones, H., McPhillips, M. A., & Joyce, E. M. (2006) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.188.5.494 · Cited by 3
Vondráčková, P., & Šmahel, D. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118771952.ch27 · Cited by 3
Weidacker, K., Johnston, S. J., Mullins, P. G., Boy, F., & Dymond, S. (2021) · CNS Spectrums · doi:10.1017/s1092852921000316 · Cited by 2
Grusiecka‐Stańczyk, M., Janik, M. K., Olejnik, P., Golenia, A., Małyszko, J., & Raszeja‐Wyszomirska, J. (2025) · Transplant International · doi:10.3389/ti.2025.12869 · Cited by 2
Cognitive characteristics of “pure” Tourette Syndrome and what we can learn from neurological study
Graff, M. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2024.2361958 · Cited by 2
Angioletti, L. (2023) · Neuropsychological Trends · doi:10.7358/neur-2023-033-angi · Cited by 2
A Family Study of Executive Function in Gambling Disorder
Aidelbaum, R., Hodgins, D. C., & Goghari, V. M. (2023) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-022-00963-2 · Cited by 4
Alcoholism: An Impulsive/Disinhibition Disorder?
Nol, X. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/32276 · Cited by 2
Pathologisch gokken: impulscontrolestoornis en gedragsmatige verslaving
Goudriaan, A. E. (2007) · Directieve therapie · doi:10.1007/bf03056862 · Cited by 2
Self-citationFailure to utilize feedback during explicit decision-making task in alcohol-dependent patients
Roopesh, B. N., Sharma, M. K., Tripathy, S., & Benegal, V. (2017) · Industrial Psychiatry Journal · doi:10.4103/ipj.ipj_82_16 · Cited by 2
Contributions from Neuroscience and Neuropsychology
Goudriaan, A. E., van Holst, R. J., Veltman, D. J., & van den Brink, W. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118316078.ch3 · Cited by 2
Self-citationAhluwalia, Y., Jangra, D., Singh, S., Sarkar, S., & Balhara, Y. P. S. (2026) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117000 · Cited by 1
Lindberg, F. A., Kagios, C., Tjernström, N., & Roman, E. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1490196 · Cited by 1
Striatal cue-reactivity and neurotransmitter function in gambling disorder
Bellmunt‐Gil, A., Majuri, J., Nummenmaa, L., Helin, S., Forsback, S. J., Rajander, J., Kaasinen, V., & Joutsa, J. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00041 · Cited by 1
Dom, G., D’HAENE, P., Hulstijn, W., & Sabbe, B. (2006) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01413.x · Cited by 1
Increased CSF Homocysteine in Pathological Gamblers Compared with Healthy Controls
Nordin, C., & Sjödin, I. (2008) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-008-9172-2 · Cited by 1
The Personality of Problem Gamblers in Hong Kong and Macao
Chan, C. C., Li, W., & Leung, E. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1068-2_3
Understanding Online Social Networking in Terms of Mental Health: A Boon or Bane?
Jaiswal, S. V. (2017) · Research in Medical & Engineering Sciences · doi:10.31031/rmes.2017.01.000518 · Cited by 1
Torrado, M. V., Dinis, S., Bacelar–Nicolau, L., Eusébio, S., & Ouakinin, S. (2020) · Revista Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental · doi:10.51338/rppsm.2019.v5.i4.89 · Cited by 1
EFs in Pathological Gambling Disorder
Balconi, M., Angioletti, L., & Delfini, G. (2021) · Advances in mental health and addiction · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82408-2_4 · Cited by 2
Proportionality Review in EU Gambling Law
Planzer, S. (2013) · Studies in European economic law and regulation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02306-9_9 · Cited by 1
Assessment and Treatment of Pathological Gambling
Tavares, H. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195389715.013.0091 · Cited by 1
Approcci clinici al disturbo da gioco d'azzardo
Cozzolino, E., & Zita, G. (2017) · MISSION · doi:10.3280/mis48-2016oa4955 · Cited by 1
Smith, J. L., & Mattick, R. P. (2018) · Cited by 1
Adult ADHD and Non-Substance-Related Disorders
Pallanti, S., & Salerno, L. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39051-8_17 · Cited by 1
Cognitive Deficits in Patients with Gambling Disorder
Агибалова, Т. В., Дмитриевна, Т. О., Buzik, O. Z., Potapova, R., & Потапов, В. В. (2020) · Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy · doi:10.17759/cpp.2020280409 · Cited by 1
Goudriaan, A. E., & Sher, K. J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3375-0_9 · Cited by 1
Self-citationAdvancing Addiction Research through the Integration of Genetics and Neuroimaging
Karoly, H. C., Hagerty, S. L., Weiland, B. J., & Hutchison, K. E. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118472415.ch18 · Cited by 1
Steinberg, L. (2010) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 1
Masui, K., & Nomura, M. (2010) · JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EMOTIONS · doi:10.4092/jsre.18.15 · Cited by 1
Dom, G., Sabbe, B., Hulstijn, W., & van den Brink, W. (2006) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.188.5.494-a · Cited by 1
Investigating the Roles of Executive Functioning and Self-Regulation in Gambling
Parikh, P. K. (2018) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., De Beurs, E., & Van Den Brink, W.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research (NL)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Goudriaan, Anna E.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-09
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 534-547
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2123110589
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 20.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- ZonMw
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (96040000-4)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- gambling addiction, executive function, alcoholism, Tourette syndrome, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, planning, time estimation, frontal lobe dysfunction, impulsivity, comorbidities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, antisocial personality disorder, nicotine dependence, neuropsychological assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcoholism, Cognition Disorders, Female, Gambling, Tourette Syndrome, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Behavior, Addictive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
