The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 48 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls
Open accessAbstract
Aims Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling have relevance for the aetiology and treatment of this disorder, yet are poorly understood. This study therefore investigated neurocognitive impairments of executive functions in a group of carefully screened Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version IV (DSM‐IV‐TR) pathological gamblers. Performance was compared to a group of normal control participants. To study the specificity of these neurocognitive deficits, a substance dependence group (alcohol dependence) and an impulse control disorder group (Tourette syndrome) were included. Design Cross‐sectional study. Setting Addiction and general mental health treatment centres. Participants Forty‐nine pathological gamblers, 48 abstinent alcohol‐dependent patients, 46 participants with Tourette syndrome and 49 normal control participants. Measurements A comprehensive neuropsychological battery measuring executive functions as well as basic cognitive functions. Findings Both the pathological gambling and the alcohol dependent groups were characterized by diminished performance on inhibition, time estimation, cognitive flexibility and planning tasks. The Tourette syndrome group showed deficits only on inhibition tasks. Basic cognitive functions were intact in all clinical groups. Comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, antisocial personality disorder and nicotine dependence influenced the impaired functions of the clinical groups only minimally. Conclusions Carefully screened groups of pathological gamblers and alcohol dependents were characterized by diminished executive functioning, suggesting a dysfunction of frontal lobe circuitry in these disorders. The resemblance between the pathological gambling group and the alcohol dependence group suggests a common neurocognitive aetiology for these disorders. Psychosocial treatment of these disorders could benefit from assessing and targeting deficits in executive functions, as they probably influence the course of these disorders negatively.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
27 Own result · 26 Not checked yet · 19 Own interpretation · 11 Own method
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pairwise group comparisons revealed slower SSRTs for the PG group, the AD group and the TS group compared to the NC group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Inhibition
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The PG group named fewer correct words than the NC group, the AD group and the TS group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Cognitive flexibility
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The AD group made more perseverations compared to the NC group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Cognitive flexibility
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, anxiety and depression scores did not correlate with performance on the EF measures (all correlations: r < 0.15).”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Co-morbidity analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the SOGS scores correlated strongly with anxiety and depression (r = 0.42 and r = 0.43, respectively, P < 0.01)”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Co-morbidity analyses
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A similar difference was found when comparing the AD group to the NC group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Planning
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the PG group, lower beta value correct scores were found than in the NC group and the TS group, indicating a stronger decrease of scores with increasing difficulty level in the PG group than in the NC group and the TS group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Planning
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pairwise comparisons on the time estimation task revealed that both the PG and the AD group had higher absolute discrepancy scores, and thus showed less accurate time estimations compared to the NC group.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Time estimation and reproduction
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For one of the three inhibition measures, the significant group difference between the PG and NC group became marginally significant (SSRT, P = 0.05).”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Co-morbidity analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the WCST, no group differences existed for the percentage of perseverative errors.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Cognitive flexibility
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 19
- Probably not a substantial claim. 17
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the Time Reproduction Task, no main effects of group or group by time length interactions were found.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Time estimation and reproduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data were re-analysed excluding participants with ADHD and/or antisocial personality disorder diagnoses.Results for all omnibus tests and pairwise group comparisons remained the same.However, two exceptions should be noted.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Co-morbidity analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared to the NC group, the PG group, the AD group and the TS group reported higher levels of ADHD symptoms (ADHD questionnaire), anxiety (STAI) and depression (BDI).”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Mean age, gender distributions, estimated IQ, scores on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, the ADHD questionnaire, the Trait version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the severity of PG in our study was comparable to the severity of PG as reported in a study including pathological gamblers who did not seek treatment, as the SOGS scores in our study were similar to the SOGS scores reported in that study [90].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eight participants were diagnosed with either ADHD inattentive subtype and/or ADHD hyperactive-impulsive subtype (see Table 1).”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Co-morbidity analyses
plainn = 8- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, a broad range of EF deficits was found in a carefully screened PG and AD group, whereas in a TS group only inhibition deficits were present.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“All subjects who were included in the TS group were diagnosed previously with TS by a psychiatrist or neurologist.”
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
“Severity of current and past verbal and motor tics was assessed with the Dutch version of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) [45].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Selection criteria and screening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
In the paper
“Several studies suggest that mild dysfunctions in EFs mediate the enhanced risk for later development of substance and alcohol dependence in children with a familial risk for developing substance dependence [92][93][94].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92][93][94]
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The most important reason for these inconsistencies concerns methodological limitations: some studies targeted only a single EF, most studies were restricted to small groups and studies often failed to assess and control for comorbid disorders and medication use.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“In addition, most studies did not investigate whether deficits in EFs were independent of deficits in basic cognitive functions.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“Finally, the specificity of EF deficits in PG is not known, because clinical comparison groups were not included in most of these studies.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
In the paper
“In contrast, research into EFs in PG is scarce, and findings are inconsistent (for a review see [26]).”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exclusion criteria for all groups were: (1) (a history of) substance abuse or dependence (section L of the Dutch CIDI)-except for alcohol abuse and dependence in the AD group; (2) (a history of) major psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, psychotic episodes or hospitalization for psychiatric disorders; (3) current treatment for mental disorders other than those under study in this”
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
“(5) the use of psychotropic medication which could not be discontinued; (6) having another language than Dutch as first language; (7) age over 60 or under 18 years; (8) positive urine screen for alcohol, cannabis or benzodiazepines.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Selection criteria and screening
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
In the paper
“EFs rely on an intact functioning of the prefrontal cortex and subcortico-cortical networks projecting to the prefrontal cortex, such as basal ganglia-thalamic and parietal networks [9][10][11].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9][10][11]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results can therefore not be generalized to female pathological gamblers, or to adolescent pathological gamblers.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to the low numbers of pathological gamblers with ADHD or ASP included in our study, it was not possible to investigate whether pathological gamblers with other comorbid disorders would have more serious EF deficits.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and abnormalities in brain structures and functions involved in EFs are present [21,24,25].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This study was approved by the Amsterdam Medical Centre Local Ethical Committee and written informed consent was given by all participants before testing.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Procedure
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The PG participants were diagnosed according to DSM-IV-TR PG criteria, using the Dutch version of section T of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) [40].”
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
“In order to be included in the study as a pathological gambler, at least five of the defining criteria had to be present currently or recently, i.e. up to 4 weeks prior to the assessment.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Selection criteria and screening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Diminished neurocognitive functions are proposed both as vulnerability factors for developing substance dependence and as the result of extraneous drugs on brain functions [12,91].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MANOVAs were performed at the domain levels (inhibition, time estimation and reproduction, cognitive flexibility, working memory, planning and non-EF basic cognitive tasks).Pairwise Bonferroni corrected group comparisons (PG-NC, PG-AD, PG-TS, AD-NC and TS-NC) were performed only when main effects of group or group × factor interactions were significant at the P < 0.05 level.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Statistical analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AD participants were diagnosed according to DSM-IV-TR AD criteria with section J of the Dutch version of the Clinical International Diagnostic Inventory (CIDI [43]).”
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
“A minimum Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 25 was required in order to exclude AD patients with severe cognitive impairment, such as alcohol-related dementia [44].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Selection criteria and screening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43]
- Not checked yetcites [44] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Selection criteria and screening · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because the AD group differed significantly in terms of age from the other groups, age was entered as a covariate in all analyses.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Statistical analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The findings of diminished cognitive flexibility functions in PG compared to normal controls in our study are consistent with findings of two studies in PG, one employing the WCST [73] and one using a Verbal Fluency Task [74], but are inconsistent with a study that reported no impairments on the WCST in a smaller PG group [80].”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our sample consisted of an adult sample of predominantly male pathological gamblers.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adding administration order as a factor in the MANOVAs affected only performance on the Digit Span Backwards task ( P < 0.01).Administration order was therefore entered as a covariate in the working memory analyses.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Statistical analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of excluded and missing data ranged from zero to five in each group, resulting in zero to nine missing cases for each analysis.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Statistical analysis
plainn = 9- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Deficits in EFs are proposed as important mediators in drug bingeing [15]”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Treatment of PG and AD may benefit from interventions targeting these EF dysfunctions.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The EF deficits as found in PG as well as AD in this study may therefore foster the continuation of these disorders, limit the impact of psychosocial treatment and promote relapse after discontinuation of PG or AD.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Several DSM-IV-TR criteria for pathological gambling resemble those of substance dependence, including loss of control, tolerance, withdrawal and negative consequences.
“Several DSM-IV-TR criteria for PG resemble those of substance dependence, such as loss of control, tolerance, withdrawal and the experience of negative consequences due to the gambling-related behaviour”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pathological gambling, substance dependence and impulse control disorders share behavioural deficits in self-regulation, manifested as an impaired ability to inhibit the urge for the desired behaviour or drug.
“these disorders are all characterized by behavioural deficits in self-regulation, as manifested in an impaired ability to inhibit the urge for the desired behaviour or drug.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Executive function deficits probably influence the course of pathological gambling and alcohol dependence negatively.
“as they probably influence the course of these disorders negatively.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“SSRT is prolonged in chronic cocaine users [51], chronic methamphetamine users [52] and alcohol-dependent subjects [48], compared with normal control subjects, suggesting a response-inhibition deficit.”
From Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Abstract
“Forty-nine pathological gamblers, 48 abstinent alcohol-dependent patients, 46 participants with Tourette syndrome and 49 normal control participants.”
§ Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling > Final sample
“The final sample contained 49 pathological gamblers, 48 alcohol dependants, abstinent for a period of 3-12 months, 46 TS patients and 50 normal controls.”
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/springerreference_121117 · Cited by 20,772
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire
HEATHERTON, T. F., KOZLOWSKI, L. T., FRECKER, R. C., & FAGERSTROM, K. (1991) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x · Cited by 10,738
MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1835 · Cited by 3,666
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual – Revised and Expanded
Heaton, R. K., Chelune, C., Talley, J., Kay, G., & Curtiss, G. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,975
(1987) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.144.9.1184 · Cited by 2,948
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Robins L., 1998, Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM‐IV
- World Health Organisation, 1997, Composite International Diagnostic Interview
- Van der Ploeg H. M., 1980, Validity of the Zelf‐Beoordelings‐Vragenlijst [Dutch version of the Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory], Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor de Psychologie En Haar Grensgebieden, 35, 243
- Hammes J. W., 1971, De Stroop Kleur–Woord Test Handleiding [the Stroop Colour–Word Test: Manual]
- Heaton R. K., 1981, A Manual for the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
- Luteijn F., 1983, Handleiding Groninger Intelligentietest (GIT) [Manual Groningen Intelligence Test]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Verdejo‐García, A., Lawrence, A. J., & Clark, L. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.11.003 · Cited by 1,502
Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005 · Cited by 1,373
Introduction to Behavioral Addictions
Grant, J. E., Potenza, M. N., Weinstein, A., & Gorelick, D. A. (2010) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.3109/00952990.2010.491884 · Cited by 1,242
Billieux, J., Maurage, P., Lopez-Fernandez, O., Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-015-0054-y · Cited by 1,205
Online Social Network Site Addiction: A Comprehensive Review
Andreassen, C. S. (2015) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9 · Cited by 1,212
Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research
Billieux, J., Schimmenti, A., Khazaal, Y., Maurage, P., & Heeren, A. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.4.2015.009 · Cited by 920
Problematic use of the mobile phone: A literature review and a pathways model
Billieux, J. (2012) · Current Psychiatry Reviews · doi:10.2174/157340012803520522 · Cited by 794
Internet gaming disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review
Paulus, F. W., Ohmann, S., von Gontard, A., & Popow, C. (2018) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.13754 · Cited by 730
Inhibitory control and psychopathology: A meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task
LIPSZYC, J., & SCHACHAR, R. (2010) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617710000895 · Cited by 627
Widespread and sustained cognitive deficits in alcoholism: a meta-analysis.
Stavro, K., Pelletier, J., & Potvin, S. (2013) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00418.x · Cited by 594
The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality
Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/jba.2.2013.003 · Cited by 589
Brand, M., Young, K. S., & Laier, C. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00375 · Cited by 565
“These approaches have already been transferred to behavioral addictions, such as pathological gambling (e.g., Goudriaan et al., 2004; Brand et al., 2005b; Goudriaan et al., 2005, 2006; van Holst et al., 2010; Conversano et al., 2012) and compulsive buying (e.g., Black et al., 2012).”
BackgroundDeficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: a meta-analysis.
Smith, J. L., Mattick, R. P., Jamadar, S. D., & Iredale, J. M. (2014) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009 · Cited by 546
Validation and psychometric properties of a short version of Young’s Internet Addiction Test
Pawlikowski, M., Altstötter-Gleich, C., & Brand, M. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.014 · Cited by 523
The neurobiology and genetics of impulse control disorders: Relationships to drug addictions
Brewer, J. A., & Potenza, M. N. (2007) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2007.06.043 · Cited by 540
Hodgins, D. C., Stea, J. N., & Grant, J. E. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62185-x · Cited by 457
Leeman, R. F., & Potenza, M. N. (2012) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2550-7 · Cited by 448
Adolescent impulsivity phenotypes characterized by distinct brain networks
the IMAGEN Consortium, Whelan, R., Conrod, P. J., Poline, J.-B., Lourdusamy, A., Banaschewski, T., Barker, G. J., Bellgrove, M. A., Büchel, C., Byrne, M., et al. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3092 · Cited by 420
Nederkoorn, C., Houben, K., Hofmann, W., Roefs, A., & Jansen, A. (2010) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019921 · Cited by 393
The Neurobiology of Substance and Behavioral Addictions
Grant, J. E., Brewer, J. A., & Potenza, M. N. (2006) · CNS Spectrums · doi:10.1017/s109285290001511x · Cited by 372
Why gamblers fail to win: A review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling
van Holst, R. J., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.007 · Cited by 396
Self-citationKuss, D. J., Louws, J., & Wiers, R. W. H. J. (2012) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0034 · Cited by 364
Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling
Lawrence, A. J., Luty, J. S., Bogdan, N. A., Sahakian, B. J., & Clark, L. (2009) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-009-1645-x · Cited by 346
van Rooij, A. J., Kuss, D., Griffiths, M., Shorter, G., Schoenmakers, M. T., & van de Mheen, D. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/jba.3.2014.013 · Cited by 316
Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Gatchalian, K. M., & McClure, S. M. (2012) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2689-x · Cited by 338
de Ruiter, M. B., Veltman, D. J., Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., Sjoerds, Z., & van den Brink, W. (2008) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2008.175 · Cited by 331
Self-citationRobbins, T. W., & Clark, L. (2014) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.09.005 · Cited by 330
Balodis, I. M., Kober, H., Worhunsky, P. D., Stevens, M. C., Pearlson, G. D., & Potenza, M. N. (2012) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.01.006 · Cited by 305
Grant, J. E., & Chamberlain, S. R. (2014) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.022 · Cited by 325
Decision-making during gambling: an integration of cognitive and psychobiological approaches
Clark, L. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0147 · Cited by 322
Behavioural addictions in adolescents and young adults: Results from a prevalence study
Villella, C., Martinotti, G., Di Nicola, M., Cassano, M., La Torre, G., Gliubizzi, M. D., Messeri, I., Petruccelli, F., Bria, P., Janiri, L., et al. (2011) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-010-9206-0 · Cited by 287
Problem gamblers share deficits in impulsive decision-making with alcohol-dependent individuals.
Lawrence, A. J., Luty, J., Bogdan, N. A., Sahakian, B. J., & Clark, L. (2009) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02533.x · Cited by 287
A Systematic Meta-Review of Impulsivity and Compulsivity in Addictive Behaviors
Lee, R. S. C., Hoppenbrouwers, S., & Franken, I. (2019) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-019-09402-x · Cited by 284
The role of urgency and its underlying psychological mechanisms in problematic behaviours
Billieux, J., Gay, P., Rochat, L., & der Linden, M. V. (2010) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.07.008 · Cited by 294
Impulsivity in Internet Addiction: A Comparison with Pathological Gambling
Lee, H. W., Choi, J., Shin, Y.-C., Lee, J., Jung, H. Y., & Kwon, J. S. (2012) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0063 · Cited by 255
Compulsivity in obsessive–compulsive disorder and addictions
Figee, M., Pattij, T., Willuhn, I., Luigjes, J., van den Brink, W., Goudriaan, A. E., Potenza, M. N., Robbins, T. W., & Denys, D. A. J. P. (2015) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.003 · Cited by 258
Self-citationLinnet, J., Møller, A., Peterson, E., Gjedde, A., & Doudet, D. (2011) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03126.x · Cited by 214
Impulsive choice and response in dopamine agonist-related impulse control behaviors
Voon, V., Reynolds, B. A., Brezing, C., Galléa, C., Skaljic, M., Ekanayake, V., Fernandez, H. H., Potenza, M. N., Dolan, R. J., & Hallett, M. (2009) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-009-1697-y · Cited by 222
Fernie, G., Cole, J. C., Goudie, A. J., & Field, M. (2010) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.05.011 · Cited by 201
Frascella, J., Potenza, M. N., Brown, L. L., & Childress, A. R. (2010) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05420.x · Cited by 203
Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., de Beurs, E., & van den Brink, W. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291707000694 · Cited by 198
Self-citationYoung adult gambling behaviors and their relationship with the persistence of ADHD
Breyer, J. L., Botzet, A. M., Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R. D., August, G., & Realmuto, G. (2009) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-009-9126-z · Cited by 187
Choi, S., Kim, H., Kim, G., Jeon, Y.-J., Park, S. H., Lee, J., Jung, H. Y., Sohn, B. K., Choi, J., & Kim, D. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/jba.3.2014.4.6 · Cited by 180
Alcohol cues increase cognitive impulsivity in individuals with alcoholism
Noël, X., der Linden, M. V., d'Acremont, M., Bechara, A., Dan, B., Hanak, C., & Verbanck, P. (2007) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0695-6 · Cited by 182
Brain Imaging Studies in Pathological Gambling
van Holst, R. J., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2010) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-010-0141-7 · Cited by 176
Self-citationGambling Severity Predicts Midbrain Response to Near-Miss Outcomes
Chase, H. W., & Clark, L. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5758-09.2010 · Cited by 168
Cognitive control in alcohol use disorder: deficits and clinical relevance
Wilcox, C. E., Dekonenko, C. J., Mayer, A. R., Bogenschutz, M. P., & Turner, J. A. (2013) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/revneuro-2013-0054 · Cited by 174
Medication-related impulse control and repetitive behaviors in Parkinson??s disease
Voon, V., Potenza, M. N., & Thomsen, T. R. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e32826fbc8f · Cited by 162
de Ruiter, M. B., Oosterlaan, J., Veltman, D. J., van den Brink, W., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2011) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.010 · Cited by 160
Self-citationNeural correlates of cognitive control in gambling disorder: a systematic review of fMRI studies
Moccia, L., Pettorruso, M., De Crescenzo, F., De Risio, L., di Nuzzo, L., Martinotti, G., Bifone, A., Janiri, L., & Di Nicola, M. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.025 · Cited by 158
Fronto-striatal circuits in response-inhibition: Relevance to addiction
Morein‐Zamir, S., & Robbins, T. W. (2014) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.012 · Cited by 164
Yan, W.-S., Li, Y., Xiao, L., Zhu, N., Bechara, A., & Sui, N. (2013) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.09.027 · Cited by 165
Albein-Urios, N., Martinez-González, J. M., Lozano, Ó., Clark, L., & Verdejo-García, A. (2012) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.03.008 · Cited by 153
The effects of cue-specific inhibition training on alcohol consumption in heavy social drinkers.
Jones, A., & Field, M. (2012) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/a0030683 · Cited by 152
Kovács, I., Richman, M. J., Janka, Z., Maraz, A., & Andó, B. (2017) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.023 · Cited by 151
A voxel-based morphometry study comparing problem gamblers, alcohol abusers, and healthy controls
van Holst, R. J., de Ruiter, M. B., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2012) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.12.025 · Cited by 150
Self-citationFauth‐Bühler, M., Mann, K. F., & Potenza, M. N. (2016) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.12378 · Cited by 165
Power, Y., Goodyear, B. G., & Crockford, D. N. (2011) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-011-9278-5 · Cited by 147
Лааксонен, Э., Koski‐Jännes, A., Salaspuro, M. P., Ahtinen, H., & Alho, H. (2007) · Alcohol and Alcoholism · doi:10.1093/alcalc/agm136 · Cited by 148
Decision-making and prepotent response inhibition functions in excessive internet users
Sun, D.-L., Chen, Z.-J., Ma, N., Zhang, X.-C., Fu, X.-M., & Zhang, D.-R. (2009) · CNS Spectrums · doi:10.1017/s1092852900000225 · Cited by 143
Fronto‐striatal functional connectivity during response inhibition in alcohol dependence
Courtney, K. E., Ghahremani, D. G., & Ray, L. A. (2012) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.12013 · Cited by 143
de Visser, L. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00109 · Cited by 157
Billieux, J., Lagrange, G., der Linden, M. V., Lançon, C., Adida, M., & Jeanningros, R. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.01.001 · Cited by 135
Pathological Gambling and Substance Use Disorders
Wareham, J. D., & Potenza, M. N. (2010) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.3109/00952991003721118 · Cited by 135
van Holst, R. J., Lemmens, J. S., Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., Veltman, D. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.07.006 · Cited by 133
Self-citationImpulsivity differences in recreational cannabis users and binge drinkers in a university population
Moreno, M., Estévez, Á. F., Basurto, F. Z., Montes, J. M. G., Gutiérrez-Ferre, V. E., Esteban, L., Sánchez-Santed, F., & Flores, P. (2012) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.02.011 · Cited by 129
Zhou, Z., Zhou, H., & Zhu, H. (2015) · Acta Neuropsychiatrica · doi:10.1017/neu.2015.54 · Cited by 130
van Timmeren, T., Daams, J. G., van Holst, R. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.022 · Cited by 128
Self-citationDopamine release in ventral striatum of pathological gamblers losing money
Linnet, J., Peterson, E., Doudet, D. J., Gjedde, A., & Møller, A. (2010) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01591.x · Cited by 127
Pathological Gambling and Motor Impulsivity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Chowdhury, N. S., Livesey, E. J., Blaszczynski, A. P., & Harris, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-017-9683-5 · Cited by 136
Reid, R. C., Karim, R., McCrory, E., & Carpenter, B. N. (2010) · International Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.3109/00207450903165577 · Cited by 134
Ledgerwood, D. M., Alessi, S. M., Phoenix, N., & Petry, N. M. (2009) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.06.011 · Cited by 123
“We found, however, that PGs did not have significantly more difficulty inhibiting responses when faced with a stop signal than control participants, a finding that is contrary to some prior published studies that found poorer response inhibition in PGs (Fuentes et al., 2006; Goudriaan et al., 2006).”
The puzzling question of inhibitory control in Tourette syndrome: A meta-analysis
Morand‐Beaulieu, S., Grot, S., Lavoie, J., Leclerc, J. B., Luck, D., & Lavoie, M. E. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.006 · Cited by 126
Wölfling, K., Mörsen, C. P., Duven, E., Albrecht, U., Grüsser, S. M., & Flor, H. (2011) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.010 · Cited by 119
Damage to insula abolishes cognitive distortions during simulated gambling
Clark, L., Studer, B., Bruss, J., Tranel, D., & Bechara, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1322295111 · Cited by 117
Higher volume of ventral striatum and right prefrontal cortex in pathological gambling
Koehler, S., Hasselmann, E., Wüstenberg, T., Heinz, A., & Romanczuk‐Seiferth, N. (2013) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-013-0668-6 · Cited by 122
Neuropsychological aspects of Tourette syndrome: A review
Eddy, C. M., Rizzo, R., & Cavanna, A. E. (2009) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.08.001 · Cited by 120
Odlaug, B. L., Chamberlain, S. R., Kim, S. W., Schreiber, L. R. N., & Grant, J. E. (2011) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711000316 · Cited by 122
A Surprising Finding Related to Executive Control in a Patient Sample of Hypersexual Men
Reid, R. C., Garos, S., Carpenter, B. N., & Coleman, E. (2011) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02314.x · Cited by 119
Blume, A. W., & Marlatt, G. A. (2009) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9093-8 · Cited by 124
Behavioural addiction-A rising tide?
Chamberlain, S., Lochner, C., Stein, D., Goudriaan, A., van Holst, R. V., Zohar, J., & Grant, J. (2016) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.08.013 · Cited by 108
Self-citationThe exercise–cognition relationship: A virtuous circle
Audiffren, M. F., & André, N. (2019) · Journal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2019.03.001 · Cited by 116
Frontal-striatal abnormalities underlying behaviours in the compulsive-impulsive spectrum
den Heuvel, O. A. V., der Werf, Y. D. V., Verhoef, K. M. W., de Wit, S., Berendse, H. W., Wolters, E. C., Veltman, D. J., & Groenewegen, H. J. (2010) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2009.08.043 · Cited by 105
The neural bases of cognitive processes in gambling disorder
Potenza, M. N. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.007 · Cited by 114
Grant, J. E., Odlaug, B. L., Chamberlain, S. R., Hampshire, A., Schreiber, L. R. N., & Kim, S. W. (2013) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.07.008 · Cited by 104
Age and impulsive behavior in drug addiction: A review of past research and future directions
Argyriou, E., Um, M., Carron, C. R., & Cyders, M. A. (2017) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2017.07.013 · Cited by 111
Proactive Motor Control Reduces Monetary Risk Taking in Gambling
Verbruggen, F., Adams, R. C., & Chambers, C. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611434538 · Cited by 102
Impulse Control and Related Disorders in Parkinson's Disease
Lim, S., Evans, A. H., & Miyasaki, J. M. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1444.006 · Cited by 99
Christiansen, P., Cole, J. C., Goudie, A. J., & Field, M. (2011) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2396-z · Cited by 99
Conversano, C., Marazziti, D., Carmassi, C., Baldini, S., Barnabei, G., & Dell’Osso, L. (2012) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/10673229.2012.694318 · Cited by 104
Courtney, K. E., Arellano, R., Barkley‐Levenson, E. E., Galván, A., Poldrack, R. A., MacKillop, J., Jentsch, J. D., & Ray, L. A. (2011) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01635.x · Cited by 105
Romanczuk‐Seiferth, N., Koehler, S., Dreesen, C., Wüstenberg, T., & Heinz, A. (2014) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.12144 · Cited by 94
Getting a grip on problem gambling: what can neuroscience tell us?
Goudriaan, A. E., Yücel, M., & van Holst, R. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00141 · Cited by 94
Self-citationExecutive Function in Pathological Gamblers and Healthy Controls
Ledgerwood, D. M., Orr, E. S., Kaploun, K. A., Milosevic, A., Frisch, G., Rupcich, N., & Lundahl, L. H. (2012) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-010-9237-6 · Cited by 100
Cognitive dysfunctions and pathological gambling in patients with Parkinson's disease
Santangelo, G., Vitale, C., Trojano, L., Verde, F., Grossi, D., & Barone, P. (2009) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.22472 · Cited by 89
Crowe, S. F., Cammisuli, D. M., & Stranks, E. K. (2018) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acy106 · Cited by 96
Is there such a thing as online video game addiction? A cross-disciplinary review
Hellman, M., Schoenmakers, T. M., Nordstrom, B. R., & van Holst, R. J. (2012) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.3109/16066359.2012.693222 · Cited by 89
Rogers, R. D., Moeller, F. G., Swann, A. C., & Clark, L. (2010) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01216.x · Cited by 92
Jones, A., Christiansen, P., Nederkoorn, C., Houben, K., & Field, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00140 · Cited by 93
Koehler, S., Ovadia-Caro, S., van der Meer, E., Villringer, A., Heinz, A., Romanczuk-Seiferth, N., & Margulies, D. S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084565 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., De Beurs, E., & Van Den Brink, W.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research (NL)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Goudriaan, Anna E.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-09
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 534-547
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2123110589
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 20.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- ZonMw
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (96040000-4)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- gambling addiction, executive function, alcoholism, Tourette syndrome, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, planning, time estimation, frontal lobe dysfunction, impulsivity, comorbidities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, antisocial personality disorder, nicotine dependence, neuropsychological assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcoholism, Cognition Disorders, Female, Gambling, Tourette Syndrome, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Behavior, Addictive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
