Cited by 17Health Policy Implementation ScienceMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

[EDITORIAL NOTE] Providing full manuals and intervention descriptions: Addiction policy

Open access
WEST, ROBERT·2008·Addiction

Abstract

In the editorial by Michie and Abraham [1] on the need for more rigour when describing interventions is timely. There is considerable interest in behaviour change interventions and a great deal of progress is being made into determining what elements of behaviour change can be effective in what circumstances. But to enable this progress to be sustained and applied to areas such as addiction it will be essential that behavioural interventions be fully described using a terminology that allows replication and statistical and qualitative comparisons across studies. As a first step in this process Addiction will require all papers that involve behavioural interventions to lodge any manuals and treatment protocols in an online database. There will be a link from the online version of the paper to those materials. The materials should normally be reproduced verbatim but in exceptional circumstances (for example when there are copyright issues) a detailed description should be given that contains all the key elements of the intervention. It is not necessary to submit this material with the original submission; authors will be asked for it on acceptance. It would also be helpful if authors could include a summary of the intervention elements at the start of the document that they lodge in the database. Everything should be included in a single Word file or PDF. When a taxonomy of behavioural intervention elements has been more fully developed, we propose to ask authors to use that taxonomy when describing their interventions in the article itself. We hope that other journals will also adopt this policy and ultimately that there will be a common standard for reporting behavioural interventions. Comments on the policy would be welcomed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02341.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WEST, R.
Corresponding author
WEST, ROBERT
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-07
Volume
103
Issue
9
Pages
1411-1411
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2120061189
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
behaviour change interventions, intervention manual, treatment protocols, addiction treatment, intervention taxonomy, replication, reporting guidelines
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Periodicals as Topic, Editorial Policies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review