Cited by 126Smoking Behavior and CessationCompetency Development and EvaluationBehavioral Health and Interventions

Identifying Evidence-Based Competences Required to Deliver Behavioural Support for Smoking Cessation

Michie, Susan, Churchill, Sue, West, Robert·2011·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No systematic basis has yet been published for specifying competences needed to underpin behavioural support for smoking cessation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop and apply a system for identifying competences required for the delivery of individual and group-based behavioural support for smoking cessation. METHODS: Sets of recommended competences for behavioural support were identified from a range of guidance documents. Where possible, these were compared with ones based on behaviour change techniques identified within behavioural support programmes found to be effective in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and, for individual behavioural support, ones associated with higher success rates in the English Stop Smoking Services. RESULTS: Ninety-four competences were identified (71 individual and 23 additional group competences), of which 59 were cited in at least two guidance documents (51 and 8, respectively). Fourteen of the individual competences and three of the group competences were supported by RCT evidence and, for individual competences, nine were supported by evidence from the services. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to identify competences recommended for behavioural support for smoking cessation and subsets supported by different types of evidence. This approach can form the basis for the development of assessment and training of stop smoking practitioners and is currently doing so in a national programme in England. With further research, the list of evidence-based competences is likely to be extended.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-010-9235-z

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Leung J-P. Smoking Cessation by Auricular Acupuncture and Behavioural Therapy. Psychologia. 1991, 34:177-187.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michie, S., Churchill, S., & West, R.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Michie, Susan
  • Churchill, Sue
  • West, Robert
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2010-10-09
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
59-70
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2015555900
Cited by
126
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Competency Development and Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation, behavioral support, practitioner competence, behaviour change techniques, smoking cessation services, group intervention, individual-based interventions, practitioner training, guidance documents
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Smoking, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Smoking Cessation, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review