Cited by 288Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and InterventionsHealth Policy Implementation Science

Identification of behaviour change techniques to reduce excessive alcohol consumption

Michie, Susan, Whittington, Craig, Hamoudi, Zainab, Zarnani, Feri, Tober, Gillian, West, Robert·2012·Addiction

Abstract

Background Interventions to reduce excessive alcohol consumption have a small but important effect, but a better understanding is needed of their ‘active ingredients’. Aims This study aimed to (i) develop a reliable taxonomy of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) used in interventions to reduce excessive alcohol consumption (not to treat alcohol dependence) and (ii) to assess whether use of specific BCTs in brief interventions might be associated with improved effectiveness. Methods A selection of guidance documents and treatment manuals, identified via expert consultation, were analysed into BCTs by two coders. The resulting taxonomy of BCTs was applied to the Cochrane Review of brief alcohol interventions, and the associations between the BCTs and effectiveness were investigated using meta‐regression. Findings Forty‐two BCTs were identified, 34 from guidance documents and an additional eight from treatment manuals, with average inter‐rater agreement of 80%. Analyses revealed that brief interventions that included the BCT ‘prompt self‐recording’ ( P = 0.002) were associated with larger effect sizes. Conclusions It is possible to identify specific behaviour change techniques reliably in manuals and guidelines for interventions to reduce excessive alcohol consumption. In brief interventions, promoting self‐monitoring is associated with improved outcomes. More research is needed to identify other behaviour change techniques or groupings of behaviour change techniques that can produce optimal results in brief interventions and to extend the method to more intensive interventions and treatment of alcohol dependence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03845.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michie, S., Whittington, C., Hamoudi, Z., Zarnani, F., Tober, G., & West, R.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
Corresponding author
Michie, Susan
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-17
Volume
107
Issue
8
Pages
1431-1440
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1884161560
Cited by
288
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (14135)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
behaviour change techniques, excessive alcohol consumption, brief intervention, intervention effectiveness, alcoholism treatment, interobserver agreement
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Behavior Therapy, Biofeedback, Psychology, Humans, Manuals as Topic, Motivation, Observer Variation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review