Cited by 113Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electronic cigarettes: achieving a balanced perspective

Abstract

Concerns have been raised that the advent of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) may be harmful to public health, and smokers have been advised by important agencies such as the US Food and Drug Administration not to use them. This paper argues that, while more research is needed on the cost-benefit equation of these products and the appropriate level and type of regulation for them, the harms have tended thus far to be overstated relative to the potential benefits. In particular: concern over repeated inhalation of propylene glycol is not borne out by toxicity studies with this compound; risk of accidental poisoning is no different from many household devices and chemicals available in supermarkets; concern that e-cigarettes may promote continued smoking by allowing smokers to cope with no-smoking environments is countered by the observation that most smokers use these products to try to quit and their use appears to enhance quitting motivation; concerns over low nicotine delivery are countered by evidence that the products provide significant craving reduction despite this in some cases; and e-cigarettes may help reduce toxin exposure to non-smokers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03826.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wagener, T. L., Siegel, M., & Borrelli, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Wagener, Theodore L.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
107
Issue
9
Pages
1545-1548
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2152393984
Cited by
113
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
electronic cigarettes, e-cigarette regulation, propylene glycol toxicity, accidental poisoning, smoking cessation, nicotine craving, passive smoking, public health risk, cost-benefit analysis
MeSH terms
Humans, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Smoking Cessation, Harm Reduction, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review