Cited by 336Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Intentions to smoke cigarettes among never-smoking us middle and high school electronic cigarette users: national youth tobacco survey, 2011–2013

Open access
Bunnell, Rebecca E., Agaku, Israel T., Arrazola, René A., Apelberg, Benjamin J., Caraballo, Ralph S., Corey, Catherine G., Coleman, Blair N., Dube, Shanta R. +1 more·2015·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is increasing rapidly, and the impact on youth is unknown. We assessed associations between e-cigarette use and smoking intentions among US youth who had never smoked conventional cigarettes. METHODS: We analyzed data from the nationally representative 2011, 2012, and 2013 National Youth Tobacco Surveys of students in grades 6-12. Youth reporting they would definitely not smoke in the next year or if offered a cigarette by a friend were defined as not having an intention to smoke; all others were classified as having positive intention to smoke conventional cigarettes. Demographics, pro-tobacco advertisement exposure, ever use of e-cigarettes, and ever use of other combustibles (cigars, hookah, bidis, kreteks, and pipes) and noncombustibles (chewing tobacco, snuff, dip, snus, and dissolvables) were included in multivariate analyses that assessed associations with smoking intentions among never-cigarette-smoking youth. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2013, the number of never-smoking youth who used e-cigarettes increased 3-fold, from 79,000 to more than 263,000. Intention to smoke conventional cigarettes was 43.9% among ever e-cigarette users and 21.5% among never users. Ever e-cigarette users had higher adjusted odds for having smoking intentions than never users (adjusted odds ratio = 1.70, 95% confidence interval = 1.24-2.32). Those who ever used other combustibles, ever used noncombustibles, or reported pro-tobacco advertisement exposure also had increased odds for smoking intentions. CONCLUSION: In 2013, more than a quarter million never-smoking youth used e-cigarettes. E-cigarette use is associated with increased intentions to smoke cigarettes, and enhanced prevention efforts for youth are important for all forms of tobacco, including e-cigarettes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntu166

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Between 2011 and 2013, the use of e-cigarettes amongst teens tripled, with more than a quarter of a million youths having experimented with 'vaping' in 2013.

    “Between 2011 and 2013, the use of e-cigarettes amongst teens has tripled with more than a quarter of a million youths having experimented with ‘vaping’ in 2013 (Bunnell et al. 2015).”

    From <scp>N</scp> icotine and the adolescent brain (2015) · cites this paper as Bunnell et al. 2015

    The Results (E-Cigarette Use) report that the estimated number of students who had never smoked cigarettes but had tried an e-cigarette rose more than threefold, from about 79,000 in 2011 to over 263,000 in 2013. The citing sentence omits the never-smoking restriction, so the paper does not establish a threefold increase among teens overall. The Methods (Measures) define this use as having tried an e-cigarette even once. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bunnell, R. E., Agaku, I. T., Arrazola, R. A., Apelberg, B. J., Caraballo, R. S., Corey, C. G., Coleman, B. N., Dube, S. R., & King, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2014-08-20
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
228-235
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2161818525
Cited by
336
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
42.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Archive @ GSU (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Counseling And Psychological Services Dissertations (Georgia State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
electronic cigarettes, smoking intention, adolescent tobacco use, tobacco use prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, School Health Services, Smoking, Students, United States, Adolescent Health Services, Smoking Cessation, Intention, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review