The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the impact of community‐based treatment options on methamphetamine use: findings from the Methamphetamine Treatment Evaluation Study (MATES)
Open accessAbstract
Aims: To evaluate the impact of community‐based drug treatment on methamphetamine use using inverse probability of treatment‐weighted (IPTW) estimators to derive treatment effects. Design: A longitudinal prospective cohort study with follow‐ups at 3 months, 1 year and 3 years. Treatment effects were derived by comparing groups at follow‐up. IPTW estimators were used to adjust for pre‐treatment differences between groups. Setting: S ydney and B risbane, A ustralia. Participants: Participants were methamphetamine users entering community‐based detoxification (n = 112) or residential rehabilitation (n = 248) services and a quasi‐control group of methamphetamine users (n = 101) recruited from the community. Measurements: Frequency of methamphetamine use between interviews (no use, less than weekly, 1–2 days per week, 3+ days per week), continuous abstinence from methamphetamine use, past month methamphetamine use and methamphetamine dependence. Findings: Detoxification did not reduce methamphetamine use at any follow‐up relative to the quasi‐control group. Relative to quasi‐control and detoxification groups combined, residential rehabilitation produced large reductions in the frequency of methamphetamine use at 3 months [odds ratio (OR) = 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15–0.36, P < 0.001), with a marked attenuation of this effect at 1 year (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40–0.97, P = 0.038) and 3 years (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.42–1.19, P = 0.189). The greatest impact was for abstinence: for every 100 residential rehabilitation clients there was a gain of 33 being continuously abstinent at 3 months, with this falling to 14 at 1 year and 6 at 3 years. Conclusions: Community‐based residential rehabilitation may produce a time‐limited decrease in methamphetamine use, while detoxification alone does not appear to do so.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“other clinically available treatments, including long-stay residential rehabilitation, carry substantial constraints related to access, cost, and scalability (7)”
From Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for methamphetamine dependence: a case report involving daily methamphetamine use (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Residential rehabilitation has significant cost, accessibility and acceptability constraints, with minimal impact on longer-term outcomes [11].”
From Psilocybin‐assisted psychotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder: A pilot open‐label safety and feasibility study. (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology
Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. Á., & Brumback, B. (2000) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011 · Cited by 5,581
Multiple Imputation of Missing Values: Update
Royston, P. (2005) · The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0500500204 · Cited by 1,683
Gossop, M., Darke, S. G., Griffiths, P., Hando, J., Powis, B., Hall, W., & Strang, J. (1995) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.9056072.x · Cited by 1,341
Self-report among injecting drug users: A review
Darke, S. (1998) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(98)00028-3 · Cited by 1,141
The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview
Andrews, G., & Peters, L. (1998) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s001270050026 · Cited by 881
ROLLNICK, S., HEATHER, N., GOLD, R., & HALL, W. (1992) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02720.x · Cited by 818
Potential problems with the interpretation of hair analysis results
Wennig, R. (2000) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(99)00146-2 · Cited by 677
Curtis, L. H., Hammill, B. G., Eisenstein, E. L., Kramer, J. M., & Anstrom, K. J. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31806518ac · Cited by 494
Darke, S., Hall, W., Wodak, A., Heather, N., & Ward, J. (1992) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02719.x · Cited by 485
Psychiatric Symptoms in Methamphetamine Users
Zweben, J. E., Cohen, J. B., Christian, D., Galloway, G. P., Salinardi, M., Parent, D., Iguchi, M. Y., & Methamphetamine Treatment Project (2004) · American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1080/10550490490436055 · Cited by 469
Validity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version II: DSM-III diagnoses
Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Ratcliff, K. S., & Seyfried, W. (1982) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700049151 · Cited by 467
Overview of 5-year followup outcomes in the drug abuse treatment outcome studies (DATOS)
Hubbard, R. L., Craddock, S. G., & Anderson, J. (2003) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/s0740-5472(03)00130-2 · Cited by 422
The National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS): 4–5 year follow‐up results
Gossop, M., Marsden, J., Stewart, D., & Kidd, T. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00296.x · Cited by 401
A multi‐site comparison of psychosocial approaches for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence
Rawson, R. A., Marinelli‐Casey, P., Anglin, M. D., Dickow, A., Frazier, Y., Gallagher, C., Galloway, G. P., Herrell, J., Huber, A., McCann, M. J., et al. (2004) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00707.x · Cited by 387
Austin, P. C. (2010) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3854 · Cited by 358
Causal inference based on counterfactuals
Höfler, M. (2005) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-28 · Cited by 249
Choosing a cut-off on the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) for amphetamine users
Topp, L., & Mattick, R. P. (1997) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02953.x · Cited by 242
Self-citationAustralian Drug Trends 2000: Findings of the Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS)
Topp, L., Darke, S. G., Bruno, R., FRY, C. L., Hargreaves, K., HUMENIUK, R. E., McAllister, R., O'Reilly, B., & Williams, P. R. (2001) · eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) · Cited by 193
Depression: cost-of-illness studies in the international literature, a review
Berto, P., D'Ilario, D., Ruffo, P., Virgilio, R. D., & Rizzo, F. (2000) · The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics · doi:10.1002/1099-176x(200003)3:1 · Cited by 191
Amphetamine-group substances and HIV
Colfax, G., Santos, G.-M., Chu, P., Vittinghoff, E., Pluddemann, A., Kumar, S., & Hart, C. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60753-2 · Cited by 167
Hartz, D. T., Frederick, S., & Galloway, G. P. (2001) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00217-9 · Cited by 162
Godfrey, C., Stewart, D., & Gossop, M. (2004) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00752.x · Cited by 159
Depression Among Methamphetamine Users
Glasner, S. V., Marinelli‐Casey, P., Hillhouse, M. P., Ang, A., Mooney, L. J., & Rawson, R. A. (2009) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0b013e31819db6fe · Cited by 142
Teesson, M., Mills, K. L., Ross, J. E., Darke, S. G., Williamson, A. B., & Havard, A. (2007) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02029.x · Cited by 141
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2010) · World drug report · doi:10.18356/079beef9-en · Cited by 140
The Economic Cost of Methamphetamine Use in the United States, 2005
Nicosia, N., Pacula, R., Kilmer, B., Lundberg, R., & Chiesa, J. (2009) · doi:10.7249/mg829 · Cited by 136
Predictors of Relapse After Treatment for Methamphetamine Use
Brecht, M., von Mayrhauser, C., & Anglin, M. D. (2000) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2000.10400231 · Cited by 91
Glasner, S. V., Mooney, L. J., Marinelli‐Casey, P., Hillhouse, M. P., Ang, A., Rawson, R. A., & Methamphetamine Treatment Project Corporate Authors (2010) · American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00061.x · Cited by 86
Clinical course and outcomes of methamphetamine-dependent adults with psychosis
Glasner, S. V., Mooney, L. J., Marinelli‐Casey, P., Hillhouse, M. P., Ang, A., & Rawson, R. A. (2008) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.12.004 · Cited by 76
Costs and benefits of treatment for cocaine addiction in DATOS
Flynn, P. M., Kristiansen, P. L., Porto, J. V., & Hubbard, R. L. (1999) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00083-6 · Cited by 68
Miyaguchi, H., Kakuta, M., Iwata, Y. T., Matsuda, H., Tazawa, H., Kimura, H. M., & Inoue, H. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.06.017 · Cited by 67
Lee, S., Park, S., Yun, S., Kim, Y., Park, D., Kim, W., Lee, J., Lee, C. W., Hong, M., Kim, J., et al. (2010) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.11.014 · Cited by 64
Evaluating dose response from flexible dose clinical trials
Lipkovich, I. A., Adams, D. H., Mallinckrodt, C. H., Faries, D., Baron, D. A., & Houston, J. (2008) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-8-3 · Cited by 37
Nishida, Y., Takahashi, Y., Nakayama, T., Soma, M., Kitamura, N., & Asai, S. (2010) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/1475-2840-9-38 · Cited by 31
Attitudes of Amphetamine Users Towards Treatment Services
Wright, S., Klee, H., & Reid, P. (1999) · Drugs Education Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1080/09687639997304 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2011, Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Services National Minimum Data Set 2011–12 Specifications and Collection Manual, 1
- Phillips B., 2010, NSW Drug Trends 2009: Findings from the Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Responding to global stimulant use: challenges and opportunities
Farrell, M., Martin, N. K., Stockings, E., Bórquez, A., Cepeda, J. A., Degenhardt, L., Ali, R., Tran, L. T., Rehm, J., Torrens, M., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32230-5 · Cited by 310
Self-citationBrecht, M.-L., & Herbeck, D. (2014) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.702 · Cited by 280
McKetin, R., Lubman, D. I., Baker, A. L., Dawe, S., & Ali, R. L. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.283 · Cited by 221
Self-citationPharmacological Treatment of Methamphetamine/Amphetamine Dependence: A Systematic Review
Siefried, K. J., Acheson, L. S., Lintzeris, N., & Ezard, N. (2020) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-020-00711-x · Cited by 194
Stroke and methamphetamine use in young adults: a review
Lappin, J., Darke, S. G., & Farrell, M. (2017) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-316071 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- McKetin, R., Najman, J. M., Baker, A. L., Lubman, D. I., Dawe, S., Ali, R., Lee, N. K., Mattick, R. P., & Mamun, A.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Eastern Health (AU)
- Griffith University (AU)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Flinders University (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- McKetin, Rebecca
- ORCID
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-12
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1998-2008
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W1924347018
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- University of New South Wales
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Keywords
- methamphetamine use, community-based drug treatment, residential rehabilitation, detoxification, treatment effects, abstinence, methamphetamine dependence, addiction treatment, inverse probability of treatment weighting
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Methamphetamine, Recurrence, Residential Treatment, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Amphetamine-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
