Cited by 37Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Policy Implementation Science

Does it matter who you see to help you stop smoking? Short‐term quit rates across specialist stop smoking practitioners in E ngland

Brose, Leonie S., McEwen, Andy, West, Robert·2012·Addiction

Abstract

Aims: A network of S top S moking S ervices has been set up within the N ational H ealth S ervice (NHS) in E ngland. The services deliver a combination of behavioural support and medication. It is important to establish the degree of variability in quit rates attributable to differences between individual practitioners, to gauge the scope for improvement by training and professional support. The aim of the present analysis was to examine how far short‐term quit rates depend on the practitioner delivering the intervention after adjusting for potential confounding variables. Design: Observational study using routinely collected data. Setting: Thirty‐one NHS S top S moking S ervices in E ngland. Participants: Data from 46 237 one‐to‐one treatment episodes (supported quit attempts) delivered by specialist practitioners. Measurements: Three‐level logistic regression models were fitted for carbon monoxide (CO)‐validated short‐term (4‐week) quit rates. Models adjusted for age, gender, exemption from prescription charges, medication and intervention setting for each treatment episode, number of clients for each practitioner and economic deprivation at the level of the S top S moking S ervice. Secondary analyses included (i) the Heaviness‐of‐Smoking Index (HSI) as predictor and (ii) 4‐week quit rates whether or not confirmed by CO. Findings: Differences between individual specialist practitioners explained 7.6% of the variance in CO‐verified quit rates after adjusting for client demographics, intervention characteristics and practitioner and service variables (P < 0.001). HSI had little impact on this figure; in quits not necessarily validated by CO, practitioners explained less variance. Conclusions: Individual stop smoking practitioners appear to differ to a significant degree in effectiveness. It is important to examine what underlies these differences in order to improve selection, training and professional development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03935.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large differences have been identified between the quit rates achieved by services in different locations, which may be partly because of the quality of behavioural support delivered by the practitioner who offers it.

    “Large differences have now been identified between the quit rates achieved by services in different locations, which may be partly because of the quality of behavioural support delivered by the practitioner who offers it.[26][27][28]”
  • Increasingly, Stop Smoking Services outsource management of routine data to private companies, most commonly QuitManager.

    “Increasingly, however, SSS outsource management of these data to private companies.The most commonly used is QuitManager (North 51, Nottingham, UK).7,27”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Department of Health, 1998, Smoking Kills: A White Paper on Tobacco
  2. Health Development Agency, 2003, Standard for Training in Smoking Cessation Treatments

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brose, L. S., McEwen, A., & West, R.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
Corresponding author
Brose, Leonie S.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-12
Volume
107
Issue
11
Pages
2029-2036
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2122856259
Cited by
37
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Sanofi
  • Cancer Research UK (14135)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
smoking cessation, Heaviness of Smoking Index, NHS Stop Smoking Services, economic hardship
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Behavior Therapy, Carbon Monoxide, Community Health Services, Counseling, England, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Specialization, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review