Cited by 86Coffee research and impactsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and Health

Adaptation of blood pressure to continuous heavy coffee drinking in young volunteers. A double‐blind crossover study.

Open access
Ammon, HP, Bieck, PR, Mandalaz, D, Verspohl, EJ·1983·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

In a double‐blind crossover trial, the effect of 4 week daily ingestion of eight cups of regular coffee (corresponding to 504 mg caffeine) vs eight cups of decaffeinated coffee was studied. Blood pressure, heart rate and urinary catecholamines were measured in eight healthy, young volunteers. In both groups, regular coffee immediately led to a significant increase in mean blood pressure (+ 3 and + 5 mm Hg respectively). The difference between both groups, however, existed only in the first 3 to 5 days of ingestion of regular coffee. On day 5 after ingestion of regular coffee, and thereafter in weekly intervals, no significant increase in catecholamine excretion was observed. The data suggest that long‐term consumption of large amounts of coffee leads to only a small and transient rise in mean blood pressure. This may be due to an adaptation phenomenon. Therefore, continuous heavy coffee ingestion (eight cups/day for 4 weeks) by young persons does not appear to involve a risk of the development of hypertension.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1983.tb01553.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have shown that habitual consumption results in tolerance to the acute effects of caffeine, while others have found that some individuals continue to experience these acute effects with each drinking episode and that tolerance disappears after 12 hours of abstinence.

    “Some studies have shown that habitual consumption results in a tolerance to the acute effects of caffeine, 18,19 while others have found that some individuals continue to experience these acute effects with each drinking episode 20,21 and that the tolerance disappears after 12 hours of abstinence.22”
  • These results are concordant with our finding of no increased risk among those who drink coffee regularly, suggesting that habitual consumption results in a tolerance to the acute effects of caffeine.

    “These results are concordant with our finding of no increased risk among those who drink coffee regularly, suggesting that habitual consumption results in a tolerance to the acute effects of caffeine.18,19”
  • Earlier studies claiming tolerance to pressor effects of caffeine did not mirror normal staggered caffeine consumption.

    “Earlier studies which claimed to show tolerance to the pressor effects of caffeine [11,[16][17][18] have not mirrored 'normal' staggered caffeine consumption but are characterized by a prior period of prolonged abstinence followed by a high dose of caffeine administered once or twice daily.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. EICHLER, 0. (1975). Kaffee und Coffein, pp 65-320. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ammon, H., Bieck, P., Mandalaz, D., & Verspohl, E.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-06
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
701-706
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W1993785831
Cited by
86
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
coffee consumption, caffeine, blood pressure, hypertension risk, urinary catecholamines, heart rate, decaffeinated coffee, young adults
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Blood Pressure, Catecholamines, Coffee, Double-Blind Method, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review