Cited by 139Coffee research and impactsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and Health

The effect of coffee consumption on blood pressure and the development of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Steffen, Mark, Kuhle, Carol, Hensrud, Donald, Erwin, Patricia J., Murad, Mohammad H.·2012·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

CONTEXT: Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages worldwide and is known to acutely raise blood pressure (BP), but the effects of chronic consumption on BP is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies to assess the effect of chronic coffee consumption on BP and the development of hypertension. DATA SOURCES: Ovid, MEDLINE (from 1948), EMBASE (from 1988), and all of Web of Science and Scopus. STUDY SELECTION: RCTs and cohort studies of at least 1-week duration that assessed BP and/or the incidence of hypertension in coffee consumers compared with a control group that consumed less or no coffee. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion. Data were abstracted using standardized forms. Risk of bias in the RCTs was examined using the method described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Quality of the cohort studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale for cohort studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six hundred and ten articles were retrieved and a total of 15 (10 RCTs and five cohort studies) met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrated a pooled weighted difference in mean change in SBP of -0.55 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.46 to 1.36) and DBP -0.45 mmHg (95% CI -1.52 to 0.61). Meta-analysis of the cohort studies demonstrated a pooled risk ratio for developing hypertension of 1.03 (95% CI 0.98-1.08). CONCLUSION: Low-quality evidence did not show any statistically significant effect of coffee consumption on BP or the risk of hypertension. Given the quality of the currently available evidence, no recommendation can be made for or against coffee consumption as it relates to BP and hypertension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjh.0b013e3283588d73

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Steffen et al. (2012), the pooled weighted difference in mean change of SBP was -0.55 mmHg (95% CI -2.46 to 1.36) and of DBP was -0.45 mmHg (95% CI -1.52 to 0.61).

    “The pooled weighted difference in mean change of SBP was -0.55 mmHg (95 % CI = -2.46 to 1.36 mmHg) and of DBP was -0.45 mmHg (95 % CI = -1.52 to 0.61 mmHg).”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Steffen et al., 2012

  • In Steffen et al. (2012), heterogeneity in pooled SBP (I2=72%) and DBP (I2=41%) analysis was explored by type of coffee, sex and prestudy BP in subgroup analyses, but no significant interactions were found.

    “Heterogeneity in the pooled SBP (I 2 = 72 %) and DBP (I 2 = 41 %) analysis was explored by considering type of coffee, sex and prestudy BP in subgroup analyses, but no significant interactions were found.”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Steffen et al., 2012

  • The Panel notes that the Steffen et al. (2012) meta-analysis does not show a significant increase in fasting BP following consumption of caffeinated coffee for >7 days at doses of about three to six cups per day.

    “The Panel notes that this meta-analysis does not show a significant increase in fasting BP following consumption of caffeinated coffee for > 7 days at doses of about three to six cups per day.”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Steffen et al., 2012

  • In Steffen et al. (2012), coffee drinking was not significantly associated with an increased risk of hypertension at any category of coffee intake compared with the reference category.

    “Coffee drinking was not significantly associated with an increased risk of hypertension at any category of coffee intake compared with the reference category.”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Steffen et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steffen, M., Kuhle, C., Hensrud, D., Erwin, P. J., & Murad, M. H.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Steffen, Mark
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2012-12
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
2245-2254
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082598945
Cited by
139
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
coffee consumption, blood pressure, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension incidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Coffee, Drinking Behavior, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review