Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Female mice are more susceptible to the development of allergic airway inflammation than male mice

Melgert, B. N., Postma, D. S., Kuipers, I., Geerlings, M., Luinge, M. A., van der Strate, B. W. A., Kerstjens, H. A. M., Timens, W., Hylkema, M. N.·2005·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Summary: Background In humans the prevalence of asthma is higher among females than among males after puberty. The reason for this phenomenon is not clear. Objective We tested the hypothesis that female mice are more susceptible to the development of allergic asthma than male mice and studied allergic immune responses in the lung. Methods We compared allergic airway inflammation, i.e. methacholine (MCh) responsiveness, serum IgE, and cytokines, and the number of the different leucocytes in lungs of male and female BALB/c mice, twice‐sensitized to ovalbumin (OVA) and subsequently challenged with OVA (OVA‐mice) or phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS‐mice) aerosols on days 24–26, 30, and 31. Results OVA challenge significantly increased MCh responsiveness, numbers of eosinophils, CD4+ T cells, CD4+/CD25+ T cells, B cells, and levels of Thelper (Th)2 cytokines, total, and OVA‐specific IgE. There was, however, also an effect of gender, with female mice responding to OVA challenges with higher numbers of eosinophils, CD4+ T cells, B cells, and levels of IL‐4, IL‐13, IFN‐γ, total, and OVA‐specific IgE than male mice. In contrast, female PBS‐mice had significantly lower percentages of regulatory CD4+/CD25+ T cells than males (females 4.2±0.2% vs. males 5.3±0.1% of CD4+ T cells, P<0.05). Conclusion Female mice develop a more pronounced type of allergic airway inflammation than male mice after OVA challenge. The reduced percentage of regulatory T cells in the lungs of female PBS‐mice may indicate that the level of these cells in the lung during the sensitization phase is important for the development and/or progression of an allergic immune response after multiple OVA challenges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02362.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Melgert, B. N., Postma, D. S., Kuipers, I., Geerlings, M., Luinge, M. A., van der Strate, B. W. A., Kerstjens, H. A. M., Timens, W., & Hylkema, M. N.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11
Volume
35
Issue
11
Pages
1496-1503
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2135172357
Cited by
257
References
32
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Female mice are more susceptible to the development of allergic airway inflammation than male mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02362.x
The paper
Melgert, B. N., Postma, D. S., Kuipers, I., Geerlings, M., Luinge, M. A., van der Strate, B. W. A., Kerstjens, H. A. M., Timens, W., & Hylkema, M. N. (2005). Female mice are more susceptible to the development of allergic airway inflammation than male mice. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02362.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.