Cited by 141Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Reference limits of serum TSH and free T4 are significantly influenced by race and age in an urban outpatient medical practice

Boucai, Laura, Surks, Martin I.·2009·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

Summary: Objective The suitability of TSH reference limits derived from national databases to outpatient practices has not been established. We aimed to determine whether race and age influence the distribution of TSH and free T4 (fT4). Design A cross‐sectional study of an urban outpatient medical practice. Participants Patients (n = 22 116) without clinical evidence of thyroid disease or use of thyroid‐specific medications. Measurements Comparison of TSH and fT4 distributions in specific racial and age groups including blacks, whites and Hispanics. Results TSH was distributed at higher concentrations, without skew, in whites compared to blacks (median, 1·54 mIU/l vs. 1·18 mIU/l, P < 0·001) and in old (>80 years old) compared to young (20–29 years old) (median, 1·61 mIU/l vs. 1·13 mIU/l, P < 0·001). In all patients, blacks and whites, 3%, 8% and 5%, respectively, of those aged > 80 years were misclassified as having high TSH compared to those aged 20–29 years (P < 0·001). Using TSH limits from national databases resulted in significant misclassification of patients with raised or lowered TSH. Mean fT4 was significantly lower in blacks than whites (17·5 ± 4·38 pmol/l vs. 18·3 ± 3·99 pmol/l, P < 0·001), did not differ between young and old, but decreased progressively (average 7%) as TSH increased to > 4·5 mIU/l. Conclusions Reference limits for TSH differ between races and with age. Use of race‐ and age‐specific reference limits decreases misclassification of patients with lowered or raised TSH in an urban practice. The unique fT4:TSH relationships of blacks and whites may be genetically determined. The implications of the small decrement in fT4 as TSH increases remain to be explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03390.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boucai, L., & Surks, M. I.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Boucai, Laura
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03-31
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
788-793
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2003773105
Cited by
141
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
free thyroxine, race, age, racial differences, thyroid function, outpatient practice, urban population, older adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Nutrition Surveys, Reference Values, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review