Cited by 750Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Age-Specific Distribution of Serum Thyrotropin and Antithyroid Antibodies in the U.S. Population: Implications for the Prevalence of Subclinical Hypothyroidism

Surks, Martin I., Hollowell, Joseph G.·2007·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Measurements from all age groups defined the upper limit of the TSH reference range in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. The TSH median, 97.5 centile and prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH), normal serum T(4) and TSH greater than 4.5 mIU/liter, increased progressively with age. Age-adjusted reference ranges would include many people with TSH greater than 4.5 mIU/liter. OBJECTIVE: We determined whether increasing 50 and 97.5 centiles with age resulted from more patients with SCH in populations with normal TSH distribution or whether age-specific population shifts to higher serum TSH might account for these findings. DESIGN/SETTING/PATIENTS: We analyzed TSH, antithyroid antibodies, and TSH frequency distribution curves for specific age deciles in populations without thyroid disease, with or without antithyroid antibodies. RESULTS: Without thyroid disease, 10.6% of 20- to 29-yr-olds had TSH greater than 2.5 mIU/liter, increasing to 40% in the 80+ group, 14.5% of whom had TSH greater than 4.5 mIU/liter. When TSH was greater than 4.5 mIU/liter, the percentage with antibodies was 67.4% (age 40-49 yr) and progressively decreased to 40.5% in the 80+ group. TSH frequency distribution curves of the 80+ group with or without antibodies was displaced to higher TSH, including TSH at peak frequency. The 97.5 centiles for the 20-29 and 80+ groups were 3.56 and 7.49 mIU/liter, respectively. Seventy percent of older patients with TSH greater than 4.5 mIU/liter were within their age-specific reference range. CONCLUSION: TSH distribution progressively shifts toward higher concentrations with age. The prevalence of SCH may be significantly overestimated unless an age-specific range for TSH is used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2007-1499

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher serum TSH values might occur naturally as part of the ageing process.

    “Although higher serum TSH values might occur naturally, as part of the ageing process, [15][16][17]”

    From Hypothyroidism (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

  • There is robust evidence that serum TSH levels increase slightly with age, particularly after age 65-70 years.

    “There is robust evidence that serum TSH levels increase slightly with age, particularly after the age of 65–70 years (9, 74).”
  • In a population study, 70% of patients older than 80 years showed a serum TSH greater than 4.5 mU/L (97.5 centiles = 7.49 mU/L).

    “In a population study, 70% of patients >80-years-old showed a serum TSH greater than 4.5 mU/L (97.5 centiles = 7.49 mU/L) (74).”
  • NHANES III reported that the 97.5th percentile for TSH exceeded 7.0 mIU/L in individuals older than 80 years, even after exclusion of TPO-Ab-positive individuals.

    “NHANES III reported the 97•5th percentile for TSH exceeded 7•0 mIU/L in individuals older than 80 years, 15,16 even after exclusion of TPO-Ab-positive individuals”

    From Hypothyroidism (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

  • The shift in the normal TSH distribution to a higher range in older individuals might represent a normal part of ageing.

    “This shift in the normal TSH distribution to a higher range in older individuals might represent a normal part of ageing,15-17,131”

    From Hypothyroidism (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Surks, M. I., & Hollowell, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Surks, Martin I.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2007-12
Volume
92
Issue
12
Pages
4575-4582
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2033555047
Cited by
750
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 45
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
subclinical hypothyroidism, serum thyrotropin, age-specific reference ranges, thyroid autoantibodies, older adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Autoantibodies, Child, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Iodide Peroxidase, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review