Cited by 100Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Reference intervals in the diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction: treating patients not numbers

Open access
Jonklaas, Jacqueline, Razvi, Salman·2019·The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology

Abstract

Although assigning a diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction appears quite simple, this is often not the case. Issues that make it unclear whether thyroid function is normal include transient changes in thyroid parameters, inter-individual and intra-individual differences in thyroid parameters, age-related differences, and ethnic variations. In addition, a statistically calculated distribution of thyroid analytes does not necessarily coincide with intervals or cutoffs that have predictive value for beneficial or adverse health outcomes. Based on current clincial trial data, it is unclear which individuals with mild thyroid-stimulating hormone elevations will benefit from levothyroxine treatment. For example, only a small number of patients with thyroid-stimulating hormone values of more than 10 mIU/L have been studied in a randomised manner. Even if therapy is initiated for abnormal thyroid function, not all treated individuals are maintained at the desired treatment target, and therefore might still be at risk. The consequence of this is that each patient's thyroid function needs to be assessed on an individual basis with the entire clinical picture in mind. Monitoring also needs to be vigilant, and the targets for treatment reassessed continually.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30371-1

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jonklaas, J., & Razvi, S.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Jonklaas, Jacqueline
Venue
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
473-483
ISSN
2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904558892
Cited by
100
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
thyroid dysfunction, reference values, thyroid-stimulating hormone, levothyroxine, overtreatment, treatment goals, individualized assessment, thyroid function monitoring, age differences, ethnic differences, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Humans, Reference Values, Thyroid Diseases, Thyroid Function Tests, Thyroid Hormones, Thyrotropin, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review