Cited by 271Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

GUIDE study: double‐blind comparison of once‐daily gliclazide MR and glimepiride in type 2 diabetic patients

Open access
Schernthaner, G., Grimaldi, A., Di Mario, U., Drzewoski, J., Kempler, P., Kvapil, M., Novials, A., Rottiers, R. +2 more·2004·European Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Background Progressive β‐cell failure is a characteristic feature of type 2 diabetes; consequently, β‐cell secretagogues are useful for achieving sufficient glycaemic control. The European GUIDE study is the first large‐scale head‐to‐head comparison of two sulphonylureas designed for once‐daily administration used under conditions of everyday clinical practice. Design Eight hundred and forty‐five type 2 diabetic patients were randomized to either gliclazide modified release (MR) 30–120 mg daily or glimepiride 1–6 mg daily as monotherapy or in combination with their current treatment (metformin or an α‐glucosidase inhibitor) according to a double‐blind, 27‐week, parallel‐group design. Efficacy was evaluated by HbA1c and safety by hypoglycaemic episodes using the European Agency definition. Results HbA 1c decreased similarly in both groups from 8·4% to 7·2% on gliclazide MR and from 8·2% to 7·2% on glimepiride. Approximately 50% of the patients achieved HbA1c levels less than 7%, and 25% less than 6·5%. The mean difference between groups of the final HbA 1c was −0·06% (noninferiority test P < 0·0001). No hypoglycaemia requiring external assistance occurred. Hypoglycaemia with blood glucose level < 3 mmol L −1 occurred significantly less frequently ( P = 0·003) with gliclazide MR (3·7% of patients) compared with glimepiride (8·9% of patients). The distribution of the sulphonylurea doses was similar in both groups. Conclusions This study provides new insights into therapeutic strategies using sulphonylureas. It shows that gliclazide MR is at least as effective as glimepiride, either as monotherapy or in combination. The safety of gliclazide MR was significantly better, demonstrating approximately 50% fewer confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes in comparison with glimepiride.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2004.01381.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial in Europe comparing modified release gliclazide with glimepiride over 6 months, both groups achieved a reduction of A1C of around 1.0%, with fewer patients reporting hypoglycemia with modified release gliclazide (3.7%) compared with glimepiride (8.9%), and severe hypoglycemia did not occur.

    “Both groups achieved a reduction of A1C of around 1.0%, with fewer patients reporting hypoglycemia with modified release gliclazide (3.7%) compared with glimepiride (8.9%).Severe hypoglycemia did not occur.”

    From Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes (2005) · cites this paper as [123]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schernthaner, G., Grimaldi, A., Di Mario, U., Drzewoski, J., Kempler, P., Kvapil, M., Novials, A., Rottiers, R., Rutten, G. E. H. M., & Shaw, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung der Stadt Wien (AT)
  • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Schernthaner, G.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
535-542
ISSN
  • 0014-2972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2362
OpenAlex
W2172035122
Cited by
271
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gliclazide modified release, glimepiride, type 2 diabetes, sulfonylureas, once-daily dosing, HbA1c, glycemic control, hypoglycemia, non-inferiority, metformin combination therapy, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Gliclazide, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review