Cited by 149Marine and fisheries researchOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFish Ecology and Management Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Habitat characteristics of skipjack tuna ( Katsuwonus pelamis ) in the western North Pacific: a remote sensing perspective

Abstract

Skipjack tuna habitat in the western North Pacific was studied from satellite remotely sensed environment and catch data, using generalized additive models and geographic information systems. Weekly resolved remotely sensed sea surface temperature, surface chlorophyll, sea surface height anomalies and eddy kinetic energy data were used for the year 2004. Fifteen generalized additive models were constructed with skipjack catch per unit effort as a response variable, and sea surface temperature, sea surface height anomalies and eddy kinetic energy as model covariates to assess the effect of environment on catch per unit effort (skipjack tuna abundance). Model selection was based on significance of model terms, reduction in Akaike’s Information Criterion, and increase in cumulative deviance explained. The model selected was used to predict skipjack tuna catch per unit effort using monthly resolved environmental data for assessing model performance and to visualize the basin scale distribution of skipjack tuna habitat. Predicted values were validated using a linear model. Based on the four‐parameter model, skipjack tuna habitat selection was significantly ( P < 0.01) influenced by sea surface temperatures ranging from 20.5 to 26°C, relatively oligotrophic waters (surface chlorophyll 0.08–0.18, 0.22–0.27 and 0.3–0.37 mg m −3 ), zero to positive anomalies (surface height anomalies 0–50 cm), and low to moderate eddy kinetic energy (0–200 and 700–2500 cm 2 s –2 ). Predicted catch per unit effort showed a trend consistent with the north–south migration of skipjack tuna. Validation of predicted catch per unit effort with that observed, pooled monthly, was significant ( P < 0.01, r 2 = 0.64). Sea surface temperature explained the highest deviance in generalized additive models and was therefore considered the best habitat predictor.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2010.00552.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1046/j.1365-2419.2003.00220.x · DOI
  2. 10.1046/j.1365-2419.1999.00107.x · DOI
  3. 10.1017/S0025315405012336 · DOI
  4. 10.3989/scimar.2006.70s2105 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Barkley R.A., 1978, Skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis, habitat based on temperature and oxygen requirements, Fish. Bull., 76, 653
  6. Blackburn M., 1968, Micronekton of the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean: family composition, distribution, abundance and relation to tuna, Fish. Bull. US, 67, 71
  7. 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2007.00451.x · DOI
  8. FAO, 2009, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2008
  9. 10.1016/0278-4343(87)90003-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1051/alr:2008028 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00204-1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hastie T., 1990, Generalized Additive Models
  13. 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2005.00397.x · DOI
  14. Ito S., 1998, Estimation of the skipjack migration pattern by a skipjack general migration model, Tohoku Natl. Fish. Res. Inst., 60, 41
  15. 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kawai H., 1972, Kuroshio, Its Physical Aspects
  17. Kawai H., 1962, On the hydrographic condition accelerating the skipjack northward movement across the Kuroshio Front [in Japanese, English abstract], Bull. Tohoku Reg. Fis. Res. Lab, 20, 1
  18. 10.1046/j.1365-2419.2000.00144.x · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0198-0149(84)90014-1 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1046/j.1365-2419.1998.00063.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1046/j.1365-2419.2003.00241.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mishra P., 2001, Delineation of Meso‐Scale Features in the Kuroshio‐Oyashio Transition Region and Fish Migration Routes Using Satellite Data Off JAPAN
  23. Miyake M.P., 2004, Historical Trends of Tuna Catches in the World
  24. 10.3354/meps217015 · DOI
  25. Nihira A., 1996, Studies on the behavioral ecology and physiology of migratory fish schools of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the oceanic frontal area, Bull. Tohoku Natl. Fish. Res. Inst., 58, 137
  26. 10.1146/annurev.ea.19.050191.001435 · DOI
  27. 10.5670/oceanog.1994.03 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.07.031 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0079-6611(01)00036-2 · DOI
  30. 10.1023/A:1015824717293 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/01431169608949042 · DOI
  32. Robinson I.S., 2004, Measuring Oceans From Space: The Principles and Methods of Satellite Oceanography
  33. 10.1007/BF00004934 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0198-0149(86)90069-5 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.02.007 · DOI
  36. Schaefer K.M., 2007, Vertical movement patterns of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean, as revealed with archival tags, Fish. Bull., 105, 379
  37. 10.1016/S0198-0149(11)80011-7 · DOI
  38. Sund P.N., 1981, Tunas and their environment in the Pacific Ocean: a review, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., 19, 443
  39. 10.1175/1520-0485(1995)025<0475:NPIWIT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  40. 10.2331/suisan.55.619 · DOI
  41. Uda M., 1973, Pulsative fluctuation of oceanic fronts in association with the tuna fishing grounds and fisheries, J. Fac. Mar. Sci. Technol., 7, 245
  42. Uda M., 1958, Enrichment pattern resulting from eddy systems in relation to fishing grounds, J. Tokyo Univ. Fisheries, 44, 105
  43. 10.1007/s10750-008-9493-y · DOI
  44. Watanabe Y., 1995, Migration of skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis, in the western Pacific Ocean, as estimated from tagging data, Bull. Tohoku Natl. Fish. Res. Inst., 57, 31
  45. 10.1029/98EO00426 · DOI
  46. Wild A., 1993, A review of the biology and fisheries for skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis, in the Pacific Ocean, FAO Fisheries Tech. Paper, 336, 1
  47. Wilson C., 2008, Why Ocean Colour? The Societal Benefits of Ocean‐Color Technology, 47
  48. 10.1023/A:1025580313836 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0198-0149(11)80009-9 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.015 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2008.00461.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 149

Metadata

Authors
MUGO, R., SAITOH, S., NIHIRA, A., & KUROYAMA, T.
Affiliations
Hokkaido University (JP)
Corresponding author
MUGO, ROBINSON
Venue
Fisheries Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-04
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
382-396
ISSN
  • 1054-6006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2419
OpenAlex
W2163333500
Cited by
149
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fisheries Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
skipjack tuna, fish habitat, western North Pacific, sea surface temperature, surface chlorophyll, sea level anomalies, eddy kinetic energy, catch per unit effort, habitat selection, tuna migration, satellite remote sensing, generalized additive models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review