The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Habitat characteristics of skipjack tuna ( Katsuwonus pelamis ) in the western North Pacific: a remote sensing perspective
Abstract
Skipjack tuna habitat in the western North Pacific was studied from satellite remotely sensed environment and catch data, using generalized additive models and geographic information systems. Weekly resolved remotely sensed sea surface temperature, surface chlorophyll, sea surface height anomalies and eddy kinetic energy data were used for the year 2004. Fifteen generalized additive models were constructed with skipjack catch per unit effort as a response variable, and sea surface temperature, sea surface height anomalies and eddy kinetic energy as model covariates to assess the effect of environment on catch per unit effort (skipjack tuna abundance). Model selection was based on significance of model terms, reduction in Akaike’s Information Criterion, and increase in cumulative deviance explained. The model selected was used to predict skipjack tuna catch per unit effort using monthly resolved environmental data for assessing model performance and to visualize the basin scale distribution of skipjack tuna habitat. Predicted values were validated using a linear model. Based on the four‐parameter model, skipjack tuna habitat selection was significantly ( P < 0.01) influenced by sea surface temperatures ranging from 20.5 to 26°C, relatively oligotrophic waters (surface chlorophyll 0.08–0.18, 0.22–0.27 and 0.3–0.37 mg m −3 ), zero to positive anomalies (surface height anomalies 0–50 cm), and low to moderate eddy kinetic energy (0–200 and 700–2500 cm 2 s –2 ). Predicted catch per unit effort showed a trend consistent with the north–south migration of skipjack tuna. Validation of predicted catch per unit effort with that observed, pooled monthly, was significant ( P < 0.01, r 2 = 0.64). Sea surface temperature explained the highest deviance in generalized additive models and was therefore considered the best habitat predictor.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Based on the oceanic parameter model, skipjack tuna habitat selection was significantly (p < 0.01) influenced by SST ranging from 20.5 to 26°C in the Pacific Ocean (Mugo et al. 2010).”
From El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) impact on tuna fisheries in Indian Ocean (2014) · cites this paper as Mugo et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“GAMs have been previously used to study habitat preferences of many tuna species using fishery data (Lan et al., 2013;Maury et al., 2001;Mugo et al., 2010;Sagarminaga and Arrizabalaga 2010), larval survey data (Rooker et al., 2013) as well as electronic tagging data (Hazen et al., 2013).”
From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Mugo et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“Some of these variables (e.g.temperature, DCHL) have been used in previous studies (e.g.Sagarminaga and Arrizabalaga 2010;Mugo et al., 2010), but description of the habitat preferences based on other variables (e.g.MLD, ZOO) is rarely found in the literature.”
From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Mugo et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“skipjack preference for zero to positive anomalies (Mugo et al., 2010).”
From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Mugo et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R
Wood, S. N. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315370279 · Cited by 13,852
Wood, S. N. (2006) · doi:10.1201/9781420010404 · Cited by 4,953
Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios
Cheung, W. W. L., Lam, V. W. Y., Sarmiento, J. L., Kearney, K., Watson, R., & Pauly, D. (2009) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00315.x · Cited by 1,626
Teo, S. L. H., Boustany, A. M., & Block, B. A. (2007) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-007-0758-1 · Cited by 131
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1046/j.1365-2419.2003.00220.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2419.1999.00107.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0025315405012336 · DOI
- 10.3989/scimar.2006.70s2105 · DOI · Paper page
- Barkley R.A., 1978, Skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis, habitat based on temperature and oxygen requirements, Fish. Bull., 76, 653
- Blackburn M., 1968, Micronekton of the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean: family composition, distribution, abundance and relation to tuna, Fish. Bull. US, 67, 71
- 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2007.00451.x · DOI
- FAO, 2009, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2008
- 10.1016/0278-4343(87)90003-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1051/alr:2008028 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00204-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Hastie T., 1990, Generalized Additive Models
- 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2005.00397.x · DOI
- Ito S., 1998, Estimation of the skipjack migration pattern by a skipjack general migration model, Tohoku Natl. Fish. Res. Inst., 60, 41
- 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
- Kawai H., 1972, Kuroshio, Its Physical Aspects
- Kawai H., 1962, On the hydrographic condition accelerating the skipjack northward movement across the Kuroshio Front [in Japanese, English abstract], Bull. Tohoku Reg. Fis. Res. Lab, 20, 1
- 10.1046/j.1365-2419.2000.00144.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0198-0149(84)90014-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-2419.1998.00063.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-2419.2003.00241.x · DOI · Paper page
- Mishra P., 2001, Delineation of Meso‐Scale Features in the Kuroshio‐Oyashio Transition Region and Fish Migration Routes Using Satellite Data Off JAPAN
- Miyake M.P., 2004, Historical Trends of Tuna Catches in the World
- 10.3354/meps217015 · DOI
- Nihira A., 1996, Studies on the behavioral ecology and physiology of migratory fish schools of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the oceanic frontal area, Bull. Tohoku Natl. Fish. Res. Inst., 58, 137
- 10.1146/annurev.ea.19.050191.001435 · DOI
- 10.5670/oceanog.1994.03 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.07.031 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0079-6611(01)00036-2 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1015824717293 · DOI
- 10.1080/01431169608949042 · DOI
- Robinson I.S., 2004, Measuring Oceans From Space: The Principles and Methods of Satellite Oceanography
- 10.1007/BF00004934 · DOI
- 10.1016/0198-0149(86)90069-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.02.007 · DOI
- Schaefer K.M., 2007, Vertical movement patterns of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean, as revealed with archival tags, Fish. Bull., 105, 379
- 10.1016/S0198-0149(11)80011-7 · DOI
- Sund P.N., 1981, Tunas and their environment in the Pacific Ocean: a review, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., 19, 443
- 10.1175/1520-0485(1995)025<0475:NPIWIT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.2331/suisan.55.619 · DOI
- Uda M., 1973, Pulsative fluctuation of oceanic fronts in association with the tuna fishing grounds and fisheries, J. Fac. Mar. Sci. Technol., 7, 245
- Uda M., 1958, Enrichment pattern resulting from eddy systems in relation to fishing grounds, J. Tokyo Univ. Fisheries, 44, 105
- 10.1007/s10750-008-9493-y · DOI
- Watanabe Y., 1995, Migration of skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis, in the western Pacific Ocean, as estimated from tagging data, Bull. Tohoku Natl. Fish. Res. Inst., 57, 31
- 10.1029/98EO00426 · DOI
- Wild A., 1993, A review of the biology and fisheries for skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis, in the Pacific Ocean, FAO Fisheries Tech. Paper, 336, 1
- Wilson C., 2008, Why Ocean Colour? The Societal Benefits of Ocean‐Color Technology, 47
- 10.1023/A:1025580313836 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0198-0149(11)80009-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.015 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2008.00461.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna
Arrizabalaga, H., Dufour, F., Kell, L., Merino, G., Ibaibarriaga, L., Chust, G., Irigoien, X., Santiago, J., Murua, H., Fraile, I., et al. (2015) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.07.001 · Cited by 194
“Some of these variables (e.g. temperature, DCHL) have been used in previous studies (e.g. Sagarminaga and Arrizabalaga 2010; Mugo et al., 2010), but description of the habitat preferences based on other variables (e.g. MLD, ZOO) is rarely found in the literature.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialProjecting the impacts of climate change on skipjack tuna abundance and spatial distribution
Dueri, S., Bopp, L., & Maury, O. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12460 · Cited by 131
“These features have important effects on foraging areas of several species including tuna, (Mugo et al., 2010; Tew Kai & Marsac, 2010; Godo et al., 2012) but their influence is neglected in our simulations.”
BackgroundZainuddin, M., Farhum, S. A., Safruddin, S., Selamat, M. B., Sudirman, S., Nurdin, N., Syamsuddin, M. L., Ridwan, M., & Saito, S. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185601 · Cited by 108
Self-citationSaito, S., Mugo, R., Radiarta, I. N., Asaga, S., Takahashi, F., Hirawake, T., Ishikawa, Y., Awaji, T., In, T., & Shima, S. (2011) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsq190 · Cited by 99
“…datasets to demonstrate that the identification of oceanographic features such as PFZs is feasible in different ocean basins, including the Atlantic Ocean (Zagaglia et al., 2004), the western Pacific Ocean (Zainuddin et al., 2008; Mugo et al., 2010), and the Arabian Sea (Solanki et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationAlabia, I., Saitoh, S., Mugo, R., Igarashi, H., Ishikawa, Y., Usui, N., Kamachi, M., Awaji, T., & Masaki, S. (2015) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1111/fog.12102 · Cited by 81
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- MUGO, R., SAITOH, S., NIHIRA, A., & KUROYAMA, T.
- Affiliations
- Hokkaido University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- MUGO, ROBINSON
- Venue
- Fisheries Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 382-396
- ISSN
- 1054-6006 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2419
- OpenAlex
- W2163333500
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fisheries Oceanography (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Keywords
- skipjack tuna, fish habitat, western North Pacific, sea surface temperature, surface chlorophyll, sea level anomalies, eddy kinetic energy, catch per unit effort, habitat selection, tuna migration, satellite remote sensing, generalized additive models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review