Cited by 61Cephalopods and Marine BiologyMarine and fisheries researchMarine animal studies overview

Modelling climate-change-induced nonlinear thresholds in cephalopod population dynamics

Open access
ANDRÉ, JESSICA, HADDON, MALCOLM, PECL, GRETTA T.·2010·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Abstract A significant global challenge lies in our current inability to anticipate, and therefore prepare for, critical ecological thresholds (i.e. tipping points in ecosystems). This deficit stems largely from an inadequate understanding of the many complex interactions between species and the environment at the ecosystem level, and the paucity of mechanistic models relating environment to population dynamics at the species level. In marine ecosystems, abundant, short‐lived and fast‐growing species such as anchovies or squids, consistently function as ‘keystone’ groups whose population dynamics affect entire ecosystems. Increasing exploitation coupled with climate change impacts has the potential to affect these ecological groups and consequently, the entire marine ecosystem. There are currently very few models that predict the impact of climate change on these keystone groups. Here we use a combination of individual‐based bioenergetics and stage‐structured population models to characterize the fundamental capacity of cephalopods to respond to climate change. We demonstrate the potential for, and mechanisms behind, two unfavourable climate‐change‐induced thresholds in future population dynamics. Although one threshold was the direct consequence of a decrease in incubation time caused by ocean warming, the other threshold was linked to survivorship, implying the possibility of management through a modification of fishing mortality. Additional substantive changes in phenology were also predicted, with a possible loss in population resilience. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of predicting complex nonlinear dynamics with a reasonably simplistic mechanistic model, and highlight the necessity of developing such approaches for other species if attempts to moderate the impact of climate change on natural resources are to be effective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02223.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ANDRÉ, J., HADDON, M., & PECL, G. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU)
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-19
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
2866-2875
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W1902132683
Cited by
61
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Cephalopods and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
cephalopods, climate change, ecological thresholds, tipping points, nonlinear population dynamics, stage-structured population model, ocean warming, incubation time, survivorship, fishing mortality, phenology, population resilience, keystone species, marine fisheries management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review