Cited by 259Physiological and biochemical adaptationsInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Who likes it hot? A global analysis of the climatic, ecological, and evolutionary determinants of warming tolerance in ants

Abstract

Effects of climate warming on wild populations of organisms are expected to be greatest at higher latitudes, paralleling greater anticipated increases in temperature in these regions. Yet, these expectations assume that populations in different regions are equally susceptible to the effects of warming. This is unlikely to be the case. Here, we develop a series of predictive models for physiological thermal tolerances in ants based on current and future climates. We found that tropical ants have lower warming tolerances, a metric of susceptibility to climate warming, than temperate ants despite greater increases in temperature at higher latitudes. Using climatic, ecological and phylogenetic data, we refine our predictions of which ants (across all regions) were most susceptible to climate warming. We found that ants occupying warmer and more mesic forested habitats at lower elevations are the most physiologically susceptible to deleterious effects of climate warming. Phylogenetic history was also a strong indicator of physiological susceptibility. In short, we find that ants that live in the canopies of hot, tropical forest are the most at risk, globally, from climate warming. Unfortunately this is where many, perhaps most, ant and other species on Earth live.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02542.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Brett JR, 1971, Marine Ecology, Vol. 1, Environmental Factors, Part 1, 513
  2. Bush MB, 2005, Climate, 125
  3. Dunn RR, 2010, Ant Ecology, 38
  4. Ramirez J, 2008, High Resolution Statistically Downscaled Future Climate Surfaces

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 259

Metadata

Authors
Diamond, S. E., Sorger, D. M., Hulcr, J., Pelini, S. L., Toro, I. D., Hirsch, C., Oberg, E., & Dunn, R. R.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Department of Biology North Carolina State University Raleigh NC 27695‐7617 USA
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Diamond, Sarah E.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-09
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
448-456
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2141603736
Cited by
259
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
ants, warming tolerance, heat tolerance, global warming, latitudinal gradient, tropical forest canopy, habitat moisture, altitude, phylogeny, climate change vulnerability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review