Cited by 44Physical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and AccessibilityUrban Green Space and Health

Physical environmental correlates of self-reported and objectively assessed physical activity in Belgian type 2 diabetes patients: Correlates of physical activity in diabetes patients

Open access
De Greef, Karlijn, Van Dyck, Delfien, Deforche, Benedicte, De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse·2010·Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract

Despite the well-known beneficial effects of physical activity (PA) on the long-term outcomes of type 2 diabetes patients, the majority of this patient group remains inactive. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the most important PA determinants in type 2 diabetes patients in order to develop efficacious interventions to increase PA participation. The main aim of this study was to investigate the associations of physical environmental factors with objectively assessed and self-reported PA in type 2 diabetes patients. A total of 133 type 2 diabetes patients participated in this cross-sectional study (response rate: 43.3%). All participants completed the long International PA Questionnaire and two validated questionnaires to measure physical environmental perceptions and psychosocial factors. They also wore an accelerometer and a pedometer to measure PA objectively. Selection criteria were age 35-80, BMI 25-35 kg m(-²), treated for type 2 diabetes and no PA limitations. Data were collected in 2007. Physical environmental factors contributed significantly to the explained variance of all objective and self-reported PA measures (explained variance from 4% to 18%) after controlling for sociodemographic variables. Home PA equipment, walkability, aesthetics and convenience of PA facilities were the most consistent environmental correlates. The contribution of physical environmental factors remained significant for most PA measures after taking into account the variance explained by psychosocial factors (explained variance from 4% to 10%), except for step counts and recreational walking. Physical environmental factors could be important correlates of PA in type 2 diabetes patients, even beyond the contribution of sociodemographic and psychosocial variables, but additional research is needed. Nevertheless, sociodemographic and psychosocial factors remain very important and when developing future interventions, all these multidimensional correlates should be kept in mind.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00958.x

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research indicates an association between environmental factors and how much physical activity people do.

    “Studies have shown a link between the environment and people's levels of physical activity.”
  • For people with T2DM, physical environment features like home exercise equipment, nearby activity facilities, and neighborhood walkability explain as much as 18% of the variation in physical activity amount.

    “Physical environmental factors, such as home exercise equipment, proximity of a PA facility, and walkability of the neighborhood, account for up to 18% of the variance in amount of PA in amongst T2DM.111,112”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Spence J.C., Courneya K.S., Blanchard C. & Wilson P. (2000) The theory of planned behaviour and physical activity: A quantitative review of explained variation in intention and behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 7, 146.
  2. Vandelanotte C., De Bourdeaudhuij I., Sallis J.F., Philippaerts R. & Sjostrom M. (2005) Reliability and validity of a com- puterised international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ). Journal of Physical Activity and Health 2, 63-75.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Greef, K., Van Dyck, D., Deforche, B., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Published
2010-09
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
no-no
ISSN
0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1566914728
Cited by
44
References
57
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, physical activity, physical environment, walkability, home exercise equipment, recreational walking, step count, psychosocial factors, sociodemographic factors, determinants of physical activity, physical activity interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Belgium, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Behavior, Exercise, Walking, Self Efficacy, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review