The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model
Abstract
Prior research documents the significance of using platform boundary resources (e.g. application programming interfaces) for cultivating platform ecosystems through third‐party development. However, there are few, if any, theoretical accounts of this relationship. To this end, this paper proposes a theoretical model that centres on two drivers behind boundary resources design and use – resourcing and securing – and how these drivers interact in third‐party development. We apply the model to a detailed case study of Apple's iPhone platform. Our application of the model not only serves as an illustration of its plausibility but also generates insights about the conflicting goals of third‐party development: the maintenance of platform control and the transfer of design capability to third‐party developers. We generate four specialised constructs for understanding the actions taken by stakeholders in third‐party development: self‐resourcing, regulation‐based securing, diversity resourcing and sovereignty securing. Our research extends and complements existing platform literature and contributes new knowledge about an alternative form of system development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Central among these mechanisms is the deployment of boundary resources, which codify and standardize access to a platform's infrastructural services, both enabling and controlling platform complementors (Ghazawneh & Henfridsson, 2013).”
From From platform governance to institutional practice: Experimentation, misalignment, and contingent adoption of Google Arts & Culture (2025) · cites this paper as Ghazawneh & Henfridsson, 2013
In the citing paper
“One central mechanism that conditions the alignment between platform infrastructures and institutional practices is the provision of boundary resources, which simultaneously enable and control the participation of complementors and users in a platform ecosystem (Ghazawneh & Henfridsson, 2013;Poell et al., 2022).”
From From platform governance to institutional practice: Experimentation, misalignment, and contingent adoption of Google Arts & Culture (2025) · cites this paper as Ghazawneh & Henfridsson, 2013
In the citing paper
“As a prerequisite to reach the second stage of DPE emergence, the focal platform owner has to create boundary resources to enable future complementor integration (Ghazawneh & Henfridsson, 2013).”
From Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems (2023) · cites this paper as Ghazawneh & Henfridsson, 2013
In the citing paper
“Such ways include the use of boundary resources(Ghazawneh and Henfridsson 2013) such as plug-ins (recall the example of Google offering users of Microsoft Word plug-ins to make Word to work directly from Google Drive).”
From Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation (2018) · cites this paper as Ghazawneh and Henfridsson 2013
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,638
(2006) · Cited by 18,730
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis
Boyle, C., & Barker, A. (2006) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2006.1.2.36 · Cited by 11,845
(2005) · Cited by 9,479
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Teece, D. J. (1993) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)90063-n · Cited by 7,243
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
Interpreting Qualitative Data Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction
Kleinsasser, R. C., & Silverman, D. J. (1997) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329190 · Cited by 6,862
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.2307/259349 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/258786 · DOI · Paper page
- Zittrain J.L., 2006, The generative internet, Harvard Law Review, 119, 1974
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 852
Multi-actor collaboration in platform-based ecosystem: opportunities and challenges
Mukhopadhyay, S., & Bouwman, H. (2018) · Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research · doi:10.1080/15228053.2018.1479160 · Cited by 34
Data-driven Business Models in Logistics: A Taxonomy of Optimization and Visibility Services
Möller, F., Stachon, M., Hoffmann, C., Bauhaus, H., & Otto, B. (2020) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.661 · Cited by 34
Organisational hybridity and fluidity: deriving new strategies for dynamic knowledge management
Laihonen, H., & Huhtamäki, J. (2020) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/14778238.2020.1794993 · Cited by 37
Mobilising new frontiers in digital transformation research: A problematization review
Ashrafi, A., Constantinides, P., Mehandjiev, N., & Thatcher, J. B. (2025) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12531 · Cited by 33
“A modular architecture can reduce technological complexity by being decomposable into subcomponents, while stimulating generativity and open innovation (Cennamo et al., 2018; Eaton et al., 2015; Ghazawneh & Henfridsson, 2013; Henfridsson et al., 2018).”
Bergvall‐Kåreborn, B., & Howcroft, D. (2014) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12036 · Cited by 33
Gastaldi, L., Appio, F. P., Trabucchi, D., Buganza, T., & Corso, M. (2024) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12491 · Cited by 32
Governing the emergence of network-driven platform ecosystems
Kari, A., Bellin, P., Matzner, M., & Gersch, M. (2025) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-024-00745-9 · Cited by 33
Zhu, M., & Pham, H. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2951-7 · Cited by 32
de Reuver, M., & Ondruš, J. (2017) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2017.01.004 · Cited by 32
The Virtual Clinic: Two-sided Affordances in Consultation Practice
Íslind, A. S., Snis, U. L., Lindroth, T., Lundin, J., Černá, K., & Steineck, G. (2019) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-019-09350-3 · Cited by 32
Dynamics of control on digital platforms
Ens, N., Hukal, P., & Jensen, T. B. (2023) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12429 · Cited by 36
The role of platform ecosystem configuration toward performance bifurcation
Duan, W., Eva, A., Andrews, L. S., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100490 · Cited by 31
Tian, S., Sharma, A., Wu, L., & Pawar, K. (2024) · Journal of Digital Economy · doi:10.1016/j.jdec.2024.12.001 · Cited by 31
Shifting Dynamics: How Generative AI as a Boundary Resource Reshapes Digital Platform Governance
Mayer, A., Kostis, A., Strich, F., & Holmström, J. (2025) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2025.2487312 · Cited by 36
Chen, X., Yang, Y., & Wei, J. (2024) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13063 · Cited by 33
Complementor Value Co-Creation in Generative AI Platform Ecosystems
Heimburg, V., Schreieck, M., & Wiesche, M. (2025) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2025.2487310 · Cited by 33
Bender, B. (2020) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-020-00629-0 · Cited by 30
Mosterd, L., Sobota, V., van de Kaa, G., Ding, A. Y., & de Reuver, M. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102331 · Cited by 35
Platform Owner Entry Into Complementor Spaces Under Different Governance Modes
Kang, H. Y., & Suárez, F. F. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221094759 · Cited by 30
How Platform Governance Changes when Customers Become Developers
Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2019) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2019.155 · Cited by 30
Eshbayev, O., Rakhimova, S., Mirzaliev, S., Mulladjanova, N., Alimkhodjaeva, N., Akhmedova, D., & Akbarova, B. (2022) · International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems (ICFNDS) · doi:10.1145/3584202.3584205 · Cited by 29
Platform-Dependent Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review
Yu, S., & Sekiguchi, T. (2024) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci14120326 · Cited by 29
Decentralised finance platform ecosystems: conceptualisation and outlook
Eikmanns, B. C., Mehrwald, P., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. M. (2023) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2022.2163886 · Cited by 29
Designing Data Governance in Platform Ecosystems
Lee, S. U., Zhu, L., & Jeffery, R. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.626 · Cited by 29
Okano, M. T., Antunes, S. N., & Fernandes, M. E. (2021) · Independent Journal of Management & Production · doi:10.14807/ijmp.v12i4.1375 · Cited by 29
Wibisono, E. (2023) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2023.2202683 · Cited by 28
Expanding the boundaries of digital orientation research: Scale development and validation
Kindermann, B., Schmidt, C. V. H., Fengel, F., & Strese, S. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114895 · Cited by 30
Tight and Loose Coupling in Evolving Platform Ecosystems: The Cases of Airbnb and Uber
Hein, A., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2018) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5_21 · Cited by 28
Governing innovation platforms in multi-business organisations
Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2041371 · Cited by 29
Public Innovation and Digital Transformation
Väyrynen, H., Helander, N., & Jalonen, H. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003230854 · Cited by 35
Cao, L., West, B., Ramesh, B., Mohan, K., & Sarkar, S. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102570 · Cited by 28
Chen, Y., Chan, H. K., & Cai, Z. (2023) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-08-2022-0380 · Cited by 28
Governing Platforms in the Internet of Things
Schreieck, M., Hakes, C., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2017) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69191-6_3 · Cited by 27
Qualitative and Critical Research in Information Systems and Human-Computer Interaction
Wynn, E., & Hult, H. V. (2019) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Systems · doi:10.1561/2900000014 · Cited by 28
Effect of Release Timing of App Innovations based on Mobile Platform Innovations
Soh, F., & Grover, V. (2020) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2020.1831763 · Cited by 27
Platformizers, Orchestrators, and Guardians: Three Types of B2B Platform Business Models
Ritala, P., & Jovanovic, M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-57511-2_4 · Cited by 30
Mind the Gap: Exploring Stakeholders' Value with Open Data Assessment
Hjalmarsson, A., Johansson, N., & Rudmark, D. (2015) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2015.160 · Cited by 27
Sun, R., & Gregor, S. D. (2023) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2023.101791 · Cited by 33
Zhu, M., & Pham, H. (2020) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03732-3 · Cited by 26
Entrepreneurial dynamics in two-sided platforms: the influence of sides in the case of Friendz
Trabucchi, D., & Buganza, T. (2021) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-01-2021-0076 · Cited by 26
Leveraging Platform Boundary Resources: The Role of Distributed Sensemaking
Soh, F., & Grover, V. (2022) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2022.2063554 · Cited by 28
Boundary resource management in innovation ecosystems: The case of e-commerce
Wulfert, T. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00651-6 · Cited by 27
Schüler, F., & Petrik, D. (2023) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-023-00655-x · Cited by 30
Li, J., Surana, A., Chavan, M., Kano, L. L., Schotter, A. P. J., & Chirico, F. (2025) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101629 · Cited by 25
Developing an Industrial IoT Platform – Trade-off between Horizontal and Vertical Approaches
Schermuly, L., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 25
Wang, J., Guo, B., Wang, X., & Lou, S. (2020) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101007 · Cited by 25
Sun, R., Gregor, S. D., & Fielt, E. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103548 · Cited by 28
A Governance Model for Managing Lightweight IT
Bygstad, B., & Iden, J. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56535-4_39 · Cited by 25
The Emergence of Platform-Dependent Entrepreneurs: Power Asymmetries, Risk, and UncertaintyPreprint
Cutolo, D., & Kenney, M. F. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3372560 · Cited by 32
Patrucco, P. P., Trabucchi, D., Buganza, T., Muzellec, L., & Ronteau, S. (2024) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.08.012 · Cited by 25
Schmidt, R., Alt, R., & Zimmermann, A. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00671-2 · Cited by 24
Kude, T., & Huber, T. (2024) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12527 · Cited by 27
Nzembayie, K. F., & Urbano, D. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103074 · Cited by 24
Towards an evolutionary view of innovation diffusion in open innovation ecosystems
Xiong, B., Lim, E. T. K., Tan, C., Zhao, Z., & Yu, Y. (2022) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-11-2021-0686 · Cited by 24
Digital industrial platform development: A peripheral actor's perspective
Su, Z., Wei, J., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122683 · Cited by 24
Untangling Generativity: Two Perspectives on Unanticipated Change Produced by Diverse Actors
Eck, A., & Uebernickel, F. (2016) · Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) · Cited by 24
Platform Provider Roles in Innovation in Software Service Ecosystems
Kim, K., & Altmann, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2019.2949023 · Cited by 24
Skog, D. A. (2019) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 24
Exploring Tensions of Global Public Good Platforms for Development: The Case of DHIS2
Nicholson, B., Nielsen, P., Sæbø, J. I., & Sahay, S. (2019) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18400-1_17 · Cited by 24
Linåker, J., & Runeson, P. (2021) · JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government · doi:10.29379/jedem.v13i1.634 · Cited by 23
Value Sensitive Design and power in socio-technical ecosystems
Jacobs, M., Kurtz, C., Simon, J., & Böhmann, T. (2021) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2021.3.1580 · Cited by 25
Do digital platforms promote or hinder corporate brand prestige?
Tse, S. Y., Wang, D. T., Cheung, M. L., & Leung, W. K. S. (2023) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-11-2021-0837 · Cited by 25
Digital Innovation: A Research Agenda for Information Systems Research in Developing Countries
Nielsen, P. (2017) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_23 · Cited by 23
Distributed Governance in Multi-sided Platforms: A Conceptual Framework from Case: Bitcoin
Mattila, J., & Seppälä, T. (2018) · Translational systems sciences · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8956-5_10 · Cited by 25
Collaborative governance in shared accommodation platform: Moderating role of perceived risk
Jiang, G., Zhang, M., Cai, X., & Feng, X. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.09.005 · Cited by 23
Soft Governance Across Digital Platforms Using Transparency
Doshi, A. R., & Schmidt, W. (2024) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2023.0006 · Cited by 22
Weber, M., Hein, A., Weking, J., & Krcmar, H. (2024) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12567 · Cited by 24
Gawer, A., & Harracá, M. (2025) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2025.105300 · Cited by 23
Aagaard, A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-57511-2 · Cited by 26
Interfirm collaboration and exchange relationships: An agenda for future research
Borah, S. B., Mallapragada, G., Bommaraju, R., Venkatesan, R., & Thongpapanl, N. (2021) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.09.012 · Cited by 22
Framework for open insurance strategy: insights from a European study
Standaert, W., & Muylle, S. (2022) · The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice · doi:10.1057/s41288-022-00264-8 · Cited by 22
Pundzienė, A., Gerulaitienė, N., Bez, S. M., Georgescu, I., Mathieu, C., Carrabina, J., Criado, J. R., Nieminen, H., Värri, A. O., Boethius, S., et al. (2023) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102748 · Cited by 30
Chen, L., & Babar, M. A. (2014) · Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA) · doi:10.1109/wicsa.2014.45 · Cited by 22
Croitor, E., & Benlian, A. (2019) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2019.1616977 · Cited by 22
Learning to be a Platform Owner: How BMW Enhances App Development for Cars
Weiß, N., Wiesche, M., Schreieck, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.3017051 · Cited by 22
Governing digital platform ecosystems for social options
Sanner, T. A., Kempton, A. M., Russpatrick, S., & Sæbø, J. I. (2024) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12546 · Cited by 25
Third-party apps (TPAs) and software platform performance: The moderating role of competitive entry
Zhou, G., & Song, P. (2018) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.04.004 · Cited by 21
Dulsrud, A., & Bygstad, B. (2022) · Consumption and Society · doi:10.1332/quph6141 · Cited by 21
Strategic Investments for Platform Launch and Ecosystem Growth: A Dynamic Analysis
Anderson, E. G., PARKER, G. G., & Tan, B. (2023) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2023.2229125 · Cited by 21
Kazan, E., Tan, C., & Lim, E. T. K. (2014) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) · Cited by 21
Factors that hinder the success of SIM-based mobile NFC service deployments
Madureira, A. (2016) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.003 · Cited by 21
Shaping Emotional Labor Practices in the Sharing Economy
Bucher, E. L., Fieseler, C., Lutz, C., & Newlands, G. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000066004 · Cited by 21
What’s in a word? Platforms Supporting the Platform Economy
Bødker, S., Lewkowicz, M., & Boden, A. (2020) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3419249.3420167 · Cited by 21
Lin, F., Tian, H., Zhao, J., & Chi, M. (2023) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-05-2021-0292 · Cited by 22
Systematizing the lexicon of platforms in information systems: a data-driven study
Bartelheimer, C., Heiden, P. Z., Lüttenberg, H., & Beverungen, D. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00530-6 · Cited by 25
Eigenschaften und Erfolgsfaktoren digitaler Plattformen
Wiesche, M., Heimburg, V., & von Walter, B. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-44138-8_15 · Cited by 20
Digital Technologies and the Advancement of Social Justice: A Framework and Agenda
Pang, M., Kankanhalli, A., Aanestad, M., Ram, S., & Maruping, L. M. (2024) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2024/484e3 · Cited by 21
Leong, C., Hua, W., Xiao, X., Yu, J., & Zhou, Y. (2025) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2025.104251 · Cited by 20
Doing more among institutional boundaries: Platform‐enabled government in China
Zeng, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhao, Q., & Huang, H. (2022) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12500 · Cited by 23
Online Freelancing on Digital Labor Platforms: A Scoping Review
Kim, P., Cheon, E., & Sawyer, S. (2023) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3584931.3607011 · Cited by 22
Schaarschmidt, M., Homscheid, D., & Kilian, T. (2018) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919619500336 · Cited by 19
Shifting to the Cloud – How SAP’s Partners Cope with the Change
Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Kude, T., & Krcmar, H. (2019) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.732 · Cited by 19
Platforms oriented business and data analytics in digital ecosystem
Mishra, S., & Triptahi, A. R. (2019) · International Journal of Financial Engineering · doi:10.1142/s2424786319500361 · Cited by 19
Software Ecosystem Orchestration: The Perspective of Complementors
Rickmann, T., Wenzel, S., & Fischbach, K. (2014) · Cited by 19
Kossi, E. K., Sæbø, J. I., Braa, J. A., Jalloh, M. M., & Manya, A. S. (2012) · The Journal of Community Informatics · doi:10.15353/joci.v9i2.3164 · Cited by 20
Towards A New Market Entry Framework For Digital Payment Platforms
Kazan, E., & Damsgaard, J. (2016) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03837 · Cited by 19
Beyond Hype and Despair: Developing Healthy Communities in the Era of Intelligent ToolsPreprint
Zysman, J., Kenney, M. F., & Tyson, L. D. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3414691 · Cited by 19
Yi, J., He, J., & Yang, L. (2019) · Frontiers of Business Research in China · doi:10.1186/s11782-019-0060-3 · Cited by 18
The orchestrator's partner management framework for software ecosystems
van Vulpen, P., Jansen, S., & Brinkkemper, S. (2021) · Science of Computer Programming · doi:10.1016/j.scico.2021.102722 · Cited by 18
The openness of data platforms
de Reuver, M., Ofe, H., Agahari, W., Abbas, A. E., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2022) · doi:10.1145/3565011.3569056 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O.
- Affiliations
- Jönköping University (SE)
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Ghazawneh, Ahmad
- Henfridsson, Ola
- ORCID
- Henfridsson, Ola
- Venue
- Information Systems Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-192
- ISSN
- 1350-1917 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2575
- OpenAlex
- W2143642228
- Cited by
- 854
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 62.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Systems Journal (publishedVersion)
- Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- platform ecosystems, boundary resources, platform control, application programming interfaces, resourcing, platform governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
