Cited by 412Diabetes Management and EducationChronic Disease Management StrategiesNursing care and research

Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self‐management

Nagelkerk, Jean, Reick, Kay, Meengs, Leona·2006·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim. This paper reports the perceived barriers to and effective strategies for self‐management of adults with type 2 diabetes in a rural setting. Background. Worldwide, diabetes is a major public health concern and financial burden. Research shows that, for people with diabetes, adhering to programs of self‐care is often problematic. Despite the potential for improved metabolic control and quality of life, little is published on the barriers and effective strategies that people with diabetes successfully use to incorporate plans of care into their lifestyles. Methods. Twenty‐four adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were recruited from a rural primary care practice to participate in one of three audiotaped focus groups. Content analysis was conducted on the focus group transcripts and validity was strengthened through independent rankings of barriers and strategies by an expert panel and by the nurse researchers. The data were collected 2002. Findings. The most frequently reported barriers were lack of knowledge of a specific diet plan, lack of understanding of the plan of care and helplessness and frustration from lack of glycaemic control and continued disease progression despite adherence. Effective strategies identified were developing a collaborative relationship with a provider, maintaining a positive attitude that prompts proactive learning and having a support person who provides encouragement and promotes accountability. Conclusions. These data highlight the importance of barrier and strategy identification in developing and implementing realistic self‐management plans and the significance of collaborative alliances between patients and practitioners. Awareness of barriers, identification of strategies to overcome obstacles and the opportunity to problem solve with practitioners assists patients in managing a chronic illness that requires numerous daily decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03799.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagelkerk, J., Reick, K., & Meengs, L.
Affiliations
Grand Valley State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-20
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
151-158
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W1833596057
Cited by
412
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 21
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Grand Valley State University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, barriers to self-care, self-management strategies, rural population, patient-provider relationship, glycemic control, nutrition knowledge, social support, chronic disease management, primary care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Communication Barriers, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Primary Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Rural Health, Self Care, Social Support, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review