Cited by 89Embodied and Extended CognitionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Concepts, goals and the control of survival-related behaviors

Open access
Feldman Barrett, Lisa, Finlay, Barbara L·2018·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Scientists have long studied the actions that impact basic survival in various domains of life, such as defense, foraging, reproduction, thermoregulation, and so on, as if such actions will reveal the nature of emotion. Each domain of survival came to be characterized by a repertoire of distinct actions, and each action was thought to be caused by a dedicated neural circuit, called a survival circuit. Survival circuits are thought to be triggered by sensory events in the world, quickly producing obligatory, stereotypic reflexes as well as more flexible, deliberate responses. In this paper, we consider recent evidence from behavioral ecology that even so-called "reflexes" are better understood as purposeful, flexible actions that unfold across a range of temporal trajectories. They are highly context-dependent and tailored to the requirements of the situation. We then consider evidence from the neuroscience of motor control that motor actions are assembled by neural populations, not triggered by simple circuits. We end by considering the value of these suggestions for understanding the species-general vs. species-specific contributions to emotion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.10.001

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [42]Sporns O, Networks of the Brain. 2011: MIT press.
  2. [44]Wolpert DM, Pearson KG, and Ghez CPJ, The organization and planning of movement, in Principles of Neural Science., Kandel ER,, Editors. 2013, McGraw-Hill Medical: New York p. 743– 752.
  3. [54]Pearson KG and Gordon JE, Spinal reflexes, in Principles of Neural Science, Kandel ER,, Editors. 2013, McGraw-Hill Medical: New York p. 790– 811.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feldman Barrett, L., & Finlay, B. L.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
24
Pages
172-179
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899140183
Cited by
89
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (W911NF-16-1-019)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01 CA193632)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH113234, R01 MH109464)
  • National Science Foundation (CMMI 1638234)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
emotions, reflexes, motor control, neural circuits, behavioral ecology, context-dependent behavior, species-specific behavior, action control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review