Cited by 216Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Additional carbon sequestration benefits of grassland diversity restoration: Soil C sequestration and diversity restoration

Open access
De Deyn, Gerlinde B., Shiel, Robert S., Ostle, Nick J., McNamara, Niall P., Oakley, Simon, Young, Iain, Freeman, Christopher, Fenner, Nathalie +2 more·2011·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

P>1. In Europe, grassland agriculture is one of the dominant land uses. A major aim of European agri-environment policy is the management of grassland for botanical diversity conservation and restoration, together with the delivery of ecosystem services including soil carbon (C) sequestration. 2. To test whether management for biodiversity restoration has additional benefits for soil C sequestration, we investigated C and nitrogen (N) accumulation rates in soil and C and N pools in vegetation in a long-term field experiment (16 years) in which fertilizer application and plant seeding were manipulated. In addition, the abundance of the legume Trifolium pratense was manipulated for the last 2 years. To unravel the mechanisms underlying changes in soil C and N pools, we also tested for effects of diversity restoration management on soil structure, ecosystem respiration and soil enzyme activities. 3. We show that the long-term biodiversity restoration practices increased soil C and N storage especially when these treatments were combined with the recent promotion of the legume Trifolium pratense, sequestering 317 g C and 35 g N m-2 year-1 in the most successful management treatment. These high rates of C and N accumulation were associated with reduced ecosystem respiration, increased soil organic matter content and improved soil structure. Cessation of fertilizer use, however, reduced the amount of C and N contained in vegetation. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our findings show that long-term diversity restoration practices can yield significant benefits for soil C storage when they are combined with increased abundance of a single, sub-ordinate legume species. Moreover, we show that these management practices deliver additional ecosystem benefits such as N storage in soil and improved soil structure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01925.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Deyn, G. B., Shiel, R. S., Ostle, N. J., McNamara, N. P., Oakley, S., Young, I., Freeman, C., Fenner, N., Quirk, H., & Bardgett, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • Abertay University (GB)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-13
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
600-608
ISSN
0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1800535149
Cited by
216
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Natural England
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/D003946/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
soil carbon sequestration, soil nitrogen storage, red clover, Fabaceae, ecosystem respiration, soil organic matter, soil structure, soil enzyme activity, grassland management, ecosystem services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review