Cited by 149Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

Plant–microbial linkages and ecosystem nitrogen retention: lessons for sustainable agriculture

Open access
de Vries, Franciska T, Bardgett, Richard D·2012·Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Abstract

The use of nitrogen (N) in fertilizer has doubled the amount of reactive N in the biosphere, leading to increased greenhouse‐gas emissions and nutrient enrichment in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Despite the global impact of N, many uncertainties exist about the factors that determine the loss and retention of fertilizer‐associated N in terrestrial ecosystems. A growing body of evidence shows that linkages between plants and soil microbes play a major role in controlling the loss and retention of N. The promotion of such plant–microbial linkages in agricultural systems has the potential to enhance N retention and reduce N loss. Although trade‐offs with agricultural yield are inevitable, promoting plant–microbial linkages will reap benefits in terms of plant crop resistance to climate change as well as to pests and diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/110162

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Saprotrophic fungal biomass is remarkably low in arable soils, in particular in intensively managed arable land.

    “In contrast to many soils in natural ecosystems, saprotrophic fungal biomass is remarkably low in arable soils, in particular in intensively managed arable land (Djajakirana et al., 1996;van der Wal et al., 2006a;de Vries and Bardgett, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Vries, F. T., & Bardgett, R. D.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-23
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
425-432
ISSN
  • 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9309
OpenAlex
W2099718177
Cited by
149
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
12.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
nitrogen retention, nitrogen loss, soil microbes, nitrogen fertilization, sustainable agriculture, greenhouse gas emissions, nutrient enrichment, climate resilience, pest and disease resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review