The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence of the ‘plant economics spectrum’ in a subarctic flora
Abstract
Summary: 1. A fundamental trade‐off among vascular plants between traits inferring rapid resource acquisition and those leading to conservation of resources has now been accepted broadly, but is based on empirical data with a strong bias towards leaf traits. Here, we test whether interspecific variation in traits of different plant organs obeys this same trade‐off and whether within‐plant trade‐offs are consistent between organs. 2. Thereto, we measured suites of the same chemical and structural traits from the main vegetative organs for a species set representing aquatic, riparian and terrestrial environments including the main vascular higher taxa and growth forms of a subarctic flora. The traits were chosen to have consistent relevance for plant defence and growth across organs and environments: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, lignin, dry matter content, pH. 3. Our analysis shows several new trait correlations across leaves, stems and roots and a striking pattern of whole‐plant integrative resource economy, leading to tight correspondence between the local leaf economics spectrum and the root ( r = 0.64), stem ( r = 0.78) and whole‐plant ( r = 0.93) economics spectra. 4. Synthesis. Our findings strongly suggest that plant resource economics is consistent across species’ organs in a subarctic flora. We provide thus the first evidence for a ‘plant economics spectrum’ closely related to the local subarctic ‘leaf economics spectrum’. Extending that concept to other biomes is, however, necessary before any generalization might be made. In a world facing rapid vegetation change, these results nevertheless bear considerable prospects of predicting below‐ground plant functions from the above‐ground components alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Self-citationGrime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754 · cited 1×
“Plant ecological strategy schemes (e.g. Grime 1977; Westoby 1998; Dı́az et al. 2004) classify plants according tomeaningful axes of plant specialization.”
BackgroundPLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION
Garnier, E., Cortez, J., Billès, G., Navas, M.-L., Roumet, C., Debussche, M., Laurent, G., Blanchard, A., Aubry, D., Bellmann, A., et al. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-0799 · Cited by 2,313
A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme
Westoby, M. (1998) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004327224729 · Cited by 1,925 · cited 3×
“…traits, mostly allometric and regenerative traits, have previously been integrated into well-known strategy schemes (e.g. Grime et al. 1997; Westoby 1998; Craine et al. 2001; Ackerly 2004; Dı́az et al. 2004), and leaf traits were found to be the strongest representatives of the resource…”
BackgroundPlant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes
De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Bardgett, R. D. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x · Cited by 1,431
Self-citationSUDING, K. N., LAVOREL, S., CHAPIN, F. S., CORNELISSEN, J. H. C., DÍAZ, S., GARNIER, E., GOLDBERG, D., HOOPER, D. U., JACKSON, S. T., & NAVAS, M. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x · Cited by 1,285
Self-citation
Cited by
TRY – a global database of plant traits
KATTGE, J., DÍAZ, S., LAVOREL, S., PRENTICE, I. C., LEADLEY, P., BÖNISCH, G., GARNIER, E., WESTOBY, M., REICH, P. B., WRIGHT, I. J., et al. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x · Cited by 2,638
Self-citationRoumet, C., Birouste, M., Picon‐Cochard, C., Ghestem, M., Osman, N., Vrignon‐Brenas, S., Cao, K., & Stokes, A. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13828 · Cited by 566
Which is a better predictor of plant traits: temperature or precipitation?
Moles, A. T., Perkins, S. E., Laffan, S. W., Flores‐Moreno, H., Awasthy, M., Tindall, M. L., Sack, L., Pitman, A., Kattge, J., Aarssen, L. W., et al. (2014) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/jvs.12190 · Cited by 481
Self-citationGarnier, E., & Navas, M.-L. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0036-y · Cited by 490
Nonlinearity of root trait relationships and the root economics spectrum
Kong, D., Wang, J., Wu, H., Valverde-Barrantes, O. J., Wang, R., Zeng, H., Kardol, P., Zhang, H., & Feng, Y. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10245-6 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Freschet, G. T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Van Logtestijn, R. S. P., & Aerts, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-25
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 362-373
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2163688790
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence of the ‘plant economics spectrum’ in a subarctic flora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01615.x
- The paper
- Freschet, G. T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Van Logtestijn, R. S. P., & Aerts, R. (2010). Evidence of the ‘plant economics spectrum’ in a subarctic flora. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01615.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.