The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post‐stroke aphasia prognosis: a review of patient‐related and stroke‐related factors
Abstract
Rationale, aims and objectives Recovery of language function in individuals with post‐stroke aphasia is associated with a variety of patient and stroke‐related indices. Amidst a complex interaction of a multitude of variables, clinicians are faced with the arduous challenge of predicting aphasia recovery patterns and subsequently, long‐term outcomes in these individuals. Unfortunately, predictive factors are highly variable making prognosis of aphasia recovery difficult. Therefore, the objective of this review was to assess the influence of patient‐related and stroke‐related factors on language recovery in individuals with post‐stroke aphasia. Methods We completed a literature review to assess and identify evidence‐based patient and stroke‐related variables shown to be influential in aphasia recovery. Results A range of patient‐related (gender, handedness, age, education, socio‐economic status and intelligence) and stroke‐related indices (initial severity, lesion site and lesion size) were identified as potential influential factors to post‐stroke aphasia recovery. Initial severity of aphasia emerged as the factor most predictive of long‐term aphasia recovery. Other influential factors of post‐stroke language recovery included lesion site and size. Conclusions Stroke‐related factors, including aphasia severity, lesion site and lesion size, appear most critical to post‐stroke aphasia recovery. The findings presented in this review offer clinicians an evidenced‐based framework to assist in prediction of post‐stroke aphasia recovery patterns and subsequent long‐term functional communication outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Benjamin, E. J., Blaha, M. J., Chiuve, S. E., Cushman, M., Das, S. R., Deo, R., de Ferranti, S. D., Floyd, J., Fornage, M., Gillespie, C., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000485 · Cited by 12,591
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2010 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
WRITING GROUP MEMBERS, Lloyd-Jones, D., Adams, R. J., Brown, T. M., Carnethon, M., Dai, S., De Simone, G., Ferguson, T. B., Ford, E., Furie, K., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.192667 · Cited by 5,700
Tarver, T. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Health On the Internet · doi:10.1080/15398285.2014.902284 · Cited by 5,605
Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans
Knecht, S. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.12.2512 · Cited by 1,546
Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery
Pedersen, P. M., Stig Jørgensen, H., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. (1995) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410380416 · Cited by 820
Engelter, S. T., Gostynski, M., Papa, S., Frei, M., Born, C., Ajdacic-Gross, V., Gutzwiller, F., & Lyrer, P. A. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000221815.64093.8c · Cited by 688
Aphasia after Stroke: Type, Severity and Prognosis
Pedersen, P. M., Vinter, K., & Olsen, T. S. (2004) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000073896 · Cited by 622
Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome
Laska, A. C., Hellblom, A., Murray, V., Kahan, T., & Von Arbin, M. (2001) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00812.x · Cited by 528
Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review.
Jongbloed, L. (1986) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.17.4.765 · Cited by 518
Who Is at Greatest Risk for Receiving Poor-Quality Health Care?
Asch, S. M., Kerr, E. A., Keesey, J., Adams, J. L., Setodji, C. M., Malik, S., & McGlynn, E. A. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa044464 · Cited by 517
Cited by
Poststroke Aphasia Frequency, Recovery, and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Flowers, H. L., Skoretz, S. A., Silver, F. L., Rochon, E., Fang, J., Flamand-Roze, C., & Martino, R. (2016) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.006 · Cited by 432
Boyd, L. A., Hayward, K. S., Ward, N. S., Stinear, C. M., Rosso, C., Fisher, R. J., Carter, A. R., Leff, A. P., Copland, D. A., Carey, L. M., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Stroke · doi:10.1177/1747493017714176 · Cited by 417
Neuroplasticity of Language Networks in Aphasia: Advances, Updates, and Future Challenges
Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00295 · Cited by 250
Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images
Hope, T. M. H., Seghier, M. L., Leff, A. P., & Price, C. J. (2013) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.005 · Cited by 243
Current Approaches to the Treatment of Post-Stroke Aphasia
Fridriksson, J., & Hillis, A. E. (2021) · Journal of Stroke · doi:10.5853/jos.2020.05015 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Plowman, E., Hentz, B., & Ellis, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-13
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 689-694
- ISSN
- 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2753
- OpenAlex
- W1541259469
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post‐stroke aphasia prognosis: a review of patient‐related and stroke‐related factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01650.x
- The paper
- Plowman, E., Hentz, B., & Ellis, C. (2012). Post‐stroke aphasia prognosis: a review of patient‐related and stroke‐related factors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01650.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
