Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Economic burden of a gluten‐free diet

Lee, A. R., Ng, D. L., Zivin, J., Green, P. H. R.·2007·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background Coeliac disease is a common, autoimmune disorder, for which the only treatment is lifelong adherence to a gluten‐free diet. This study evaluates the economic burden of adhering to a gluten‐free diet. Methods A market basket of products identified by name brand, weight or package size for both regular wheat‐based products and gluten‐free counterparts was developed. The differences in price between purchase venues, both type of store (general grocery store, an upscale grocery store and a health food store and four internet‐based grocery sites) and region was also analysed. Results Availability of gluten‐free products varied between the different venues, regular grocery stores carried 36%, while upscale markets carried 41%, and health food stores 94%, compared with 100% availability on the internet. Overall, every gluten‐free product was more expensive than their wheat‐based counterpart (P ≤ 0.05). Bread and pasta was twice as expensive as their wheat‐based counterparts. Cost was affected more by shopping venue than geographic location. Conclusions This study demonstrated that gluten‐free foods have poor availability and are more expensive than their gluten‐containing counterparts. The impact of these findings on dietary compliance and the quality of life needs to be addressed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-277x.2007.00763.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lee, A. R., Ng, D. L., Zivin, J., & Green, P. H. R.
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-05
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
423-430
ISSN
  • 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-277X
OpenAlex
W2139114869
Cited by
314
References
0
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.