Cited by 212Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Autism and intellectual disability: a study of prevalence on a sample of the Italian population

La Malfa, G., Lassi, S., Bertelli, M., Salvini, R., Placidi, G. F.·2004·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1994, the American Association on Mental Retardation with the DSM-IV has come to a final definition of pervasive developmental disorders (PDD), in agreement with the ICD-10. Prevalence of PDD in the general population is 0.1-0.15% according to the DSM-IV. PDD are more frequent in people with severe intellectual disability (ID). There is a strict relationship between ID and autism: 40% of people with ID also present a PDD, on the other hand, nearly 70% of people with PDD also have ID. We believe that in Italy PDD are underestimated because there is no agreement about the classification system and diagnostic instruments. METHOD: Our aim is to assess the prevalence of PDD in the Italian population with ID. The Scale of Pervasive Developmental Disorder in Mentally Retarded Persons (PDD-MRS) seems to be a very good instrument for classifying and diagnosing PDD. RESULTS: The application of the PDD-MRS and a clinical review of every individual case on a sample of 166 Italian people with ID raised the prevalence of PDD in this population from 7.8% to 39.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the relationship between ID and autism and suggests a new approach in the study of ID in order to elaborate a new integrated model for people with ID.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00567.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All studies included in the present review involved individuals without intellectual disability, thus excluding a large proportion of the autism spectrum disorder population.

    “All the studies included in the present review involved individuals without in­ tellectual disability, thus excluding a large proportion of the ASD pop­ ulation (La Malfa et al., 2004; Matson and Shoemaker, 2009).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as La Malfa et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
La Malfa, G., Lassi, S., Bertelli, M., Salvini, R., & Placidi, G. F.
Affiliations
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
262-267
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W1978444163
Cited by
212
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, pervasive developmental disorders, prevalence, diagnostic classification, underdiagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Autistic Disorder, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review