Cited by 833Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Intellectual disability and its relationship to autism spectrum disorders

Matson, Johnny L., Shoemaker, Mary·2009·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) covary at very high rates. Similarly, greater severity of one of these two disorders appears to have effects on the other disorder on a host of factors. A good deal of research has appeared on the topic with respect to nosology, prevalence, adaptive functioning, challenging behaviors, and comorbid psychopathology. The purpose of this paper was to provide a critical review and status report on the research published on these topics. Current status and future directions for better understanding these two covarying disorders was reviewed along with a discussion of relevant strengths and weaknesses of the current body of research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.06.003

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All studies included in the present review involved individuals without intellectual disability, thus excluding a large proportion of the autism spectrum disorder population.

    “All the studies included in the present review involved individuals without in­ tellectual disability, thus excluding a large proportion of the ASD pop­ ulation (La Malfa et al., 2004; Matson and Shoemaker, 2009).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Matson and Shoemaker, 2009

  • Genetic approaches have identified causes for more than 1,000 Mendelian and fewer non-Mendelian forms of neurodevelopmental disorders, including intellectual disability, ASD, epilepsy, and schizophrenia.

    “Various genetic approaches have been successful in identifying the causes of more than 1,000 Mendelian, and fewer non-Mendelian, forms of neurodevelopmental disorders: prototypical examples are intellectual disability62–68, autism spectrum disorder (ASD)69–77, epilepsy78,79 and schizophrenia80–82.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matson, J. L., & Shoemaker, M.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Matson, Johnny L.
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1107-1114
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015463602
Cited by
833
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 47
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, comorbidities, disease classification, prevalence, adaptive behavior, behavioral problems, comorbid psychopathology, disorder severity
MeSH terms
Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Comorbidity, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review