The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is the placebo powerless? Update of a systematic review with 52 new randomized trials comparing placebo with no treatment
Open accessAbstract
Abstract.: Background. It is widely believed that placebo interventions induce powerful effects. We could not confirm this in a systematic review of 114 randomized trials that compared placebo‐treated with untreated patients. Aim. To study whether a new sample of trials would reproduce our earlier findings, and to update the review. Methods. Systematic review of trials that were published since our last search (or not previously identified), and of all available trials. Results. Data was available in 42 out of 52 new trials (3212 patients). The results were similar to our previous findings. The updated review summarizes data from 156 trials (11 737 patients). We found no statistically significant pooled effect in 38 trials with binary outcomes, relative risk 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.89–1.01). The effect on continuous outcomes decreased with increasing sample size, and there was considerable variation in effect also between large trials; the effect estimates should therefore be interpreted cautiously. If this bias is disregarded, the pooled standardized mean difference in 118 trials with continuous outcomes was −0.24 (−0.31 to −0.17). For trials with patient‐reported outcomes the effect was −0.30 (−0.38 to −0.21), but only −0.10 (−0.20 to 0.01) for trials with observer‐reported outcomes. Of 10 clinical conditions investigated in three trials or more, placebo had a statistically significant pooled effect only on pain or phobia on continuous scales. Conclusion. We found no evidence of a generally large effect of placebo interventions. A possible small effect on patient‐reported continuous outcomes, especially pain, could not be clearly distinguished from bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comparison of placebo effects in clinical analgesic trials versus studies of placebo analgesia
Vase, L., Riley, J. L., & Price, D. D. (2002) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00205-1 · Cited by 434 · cited 1×
“A systematic review of pain trials studying mechanisms of the effect of placebo (and not primarily the clinical effect) reported higher effects [ 13 ].”
Background
Cited by
The case of the misleading funnel plot
Lau, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Schmid, C. H., & Olkin, I. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597 · Cited by 1,766
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
Williams, A. C. D. C., Eccleston, C., & Morley, S. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007407.pub3 · Cited by 1,634
A Comprehensive Review of the Placebo Effect: Recent Advances and Current Thought
Price, D. D., Finniss, D. G., & Benedetti, F. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.113006.095941 · Cited by 1,146
Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review
Olivo, S. A., Macedo, L. G., Gadotti, I. C., Fuentes, J., Stanton, T., & Magee, D. J. (2008) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20070147 · Cited by 829
Cleare, A., Pariante, C., Young, A., Anderson, I., Christmas, D., Cowen, P., Dickens, C., Ferrier, I., Geddes, J., Gilbody, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881115581093 · Cited by 759
Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions
Hróbjartsson, A., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003974.pub3 · Cited by 777
Self-citationPlacebo Analgesia: A Predictive Coding Perspective
Büchel, C., Geuter, S., Sprenger, C., & Eippert, F. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.042 · Cited by 505
Atlas, L. Y., & Wager, T. D. (2012) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.039 · Cited by 463
How prior experience shapes placebo analgesia
Colloca, L., & Benedetti, F. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.04.005 · Cited by 443
Freedland, K. E., Mohr, D. C., Davidson, K. W., & Schwartz, J. E. (2011) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e318218e1fb · Cited by 369
Schedlowski, M., Enck, P., Rief, W., & Bingel, U. (2015) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.114.009423 · Cited by 323
Neurobiological Mechanisms of Placebo Responses
Zubieta, J., & Stohler, C. S. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04424.x · Cited by 277
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
Eccleston, C., Williams, A. C. D. C., & Morley, S. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007407.pub2 · Cited by 247
Reconsidering the Placebo Response from a Broad Anthropological Perspective
Thompson, J. J., Ritenbaugh, C., & Nichter, M. (2009) · Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s11013-008-9122-2 · Cited by 159
Placebo effect studies are susceptible to response bias and to other types of biases
Hróbjartsson, A., Kaptchuk, T. J., & Miller, F. G. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.008 · Cited by 150
“The review was updated in 2004 with similar findings [14], but the latest update from 2010 reported more multifaceted results [15].”
ResultSelf-citationDistraction and Placebo: Two Separate Routes to Pain Control
Buhle, J. T., Stevens, B. L., Friedman, J. J., & Wager, T. D. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611427919 · Cited by 105
The placebo response in functional bowel disorders: perspectives and putative mechanisms
Enck, P., & Klosterhalfen, S. (2005) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00676.x · Cited by 101
Regression to the mean in substance use disorder treatment research
Finney, J. W. (2008) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02032.x · Cited by 78
Holroyd, K. A., Labus, J. S., & Carlson, B. (2009) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.019 · Cited by 61
Seeing What We Want to See: Confirmation Bias in Animal Behavior Research
Marsh, D. M., & Hanlon, T. J. (2007) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01406.x · Cited by 53
Prospective study on cost-effectiveness of home-based motor assessment in Parkinson’s disease
Cubo, E., Mariscal, N., Solano, B., Becerra, V, Armesto, D., Calvo, S., Arribas, J., Seco, J., Martinez, A., Zorrilla, L., et al. (2017) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x16638971 · Cited by 45
Balderson, B. H., McCurry, S. M., Vitiello, M. V., Shortreed, S. M., Rybarczyk, B. D., Keefe, F. J., & Korff, M. V. (2016) · Behavioral Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1080/15402002.2015.1036271 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Hróbjartsson, A., & Gøtzsche, P. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-15
- Volume
- 256
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-100
- ISSN
- 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2796
- OpenAlex
- W2124471837
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
