Cited by 164Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects

Metformin improves endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome

VITALE, C., MERCURO, G., CORNOLDI, A., FINI, M., VOLTERRANI, M., ROSANO, G. M. C.·2005·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Abstract.: Background. Metabolic Syndrome (MS) is associated with impaired endothelial function and increased cardiovascular risk. Insulin resistance is a key feature of MS and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of metformin on endothelial function and insulin resistance, assessed by the homeostasis model (HOMA‐IR, homeostasis model assessment‐insulin resistance), in patients with MS. Methods. Sixty‐five subjects (37 men and 28 women, mean age 54 ± 6 years) with MS were allocated to receive metformin 500 mg twice daily (n = 32) or placebo (n = 33) for 3 months. Before and after treatment we assessed endothelial function, using flow‐mediated dilatation of the brachial artery, and HOMA‐IR. Results. Patients who received metformin demonstrated statistically significant improvement in endothelium‐dependent vasodilation compared with those treated with placebo (from 7.4 ± 2.1% to 12.4 ± 1.9% vs. 7.3 ± 2.5% to 6.9 ± 2.7%, P = 0.0016, metformin vs. placebo respectively), without significant effect on endothelium‐independent response to sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (P =0.32). Metformin improved insulin resistance compared with placebo group (HOMA‐IR from 3.39 to 2.5 vs. 3.42 to 3.37; 26% reduction in HOMA‐IR, P = 0.01). An association between the improvement in insulin resistance and the improvement in endothelial function (r = −0.58, P = 0.0016) was found. Conclusion. Metformin improves both endothelial function and insulin resistance in patients with MS. These findings support the central role of insulin resistance in the development of endothelial dysfunction and the role of metformin for the treatment of patients with MS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01531.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metformin significantly improves endothelium-dependent flow without a significant effect on endothelium-independent response.

    “Conversely, Vitale et al. found significant improvement of endothelium dependent flow without a significant effect on endothelium independent response [90].”
  • Many different mechanisms beyond glycemic control have been implicated in vascular protection induced by metformin, including improvements in the inflammatory pathway, coagulation, oxidative stress and glycation, endothelial dysfunction, haemostasis, insulin resistance, lipid profiles, and fat redistribution.

    “Many different mechanisms, beyond glycemic control, have been implicated in vascular protection induced by metformin such as improvements in the inflammatory pathway [86], coagulation [87], oxidative stress and glycation [88-92], endothelial dysfunction [88-90], haemostasis [88,91-93], insulin resistance improvement [94], lipid profiles [95,96], and fat redistribution [97,98].”
  • Metformin improves endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome.

    “but metformin improves endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome and improvement in FMD correlates with improvement in insulin resistance.199”

    From The Vasculature in Prediabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [199]

  • Improvement in FMD correlates with improvement in insulin resistance in patients with metabolic syndrome treated with metformin.

    “but metformin improves endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome and improvement in FMD correlates with improvement in insulin resistance.199”

    From The Vasculature in Prediabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [199]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VITALE, C., MERCURO, G., CORNOLDI, A., FINI, M., VOLTERRANI, M., & ROSANO, G. M. C.
Affiliations
  • Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
Corresponding author
ROSANO, G. M. C.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-19
Volume
258
Issue
3
Pages
250-256
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2099868021
Cited by
164
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Keywords
metformin, metabolic syndrome, endothelial function, insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, flow-mediated dilation, HOMA-IR, nitroglycerin, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Brachial Artery, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Nitroglycerin, Homeostasis, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Insulin Resistance, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Ultrasonography, Vasodilator Agents, Multivariate Analysis, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review