Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 620

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy amongst women with osteoporosis: an international epidemiological investigation

LIPS, P., HOSKING, D., LIPPUNER, K., NORQUIST, J. M., WEHREN, L., MAALOUF, G., RAGI‐EIS, S., CHANDLER, J.·2006·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Abstract.: Introduction. Vitamin D is essential for calcium metabolism as well as for fracture prevention, and a recent review suggested that the optimal serum 25(OH)D lies in the region of 50–80 nmol L−1 (20–32 ng mL−1). A high prevalence of inadequacy has been reported in many studies but the prevalence of inadequacy amongst women with osteoporosis in different regions of the world has not been well characterized. Setting and subjects. A multinational study of 18 countries at various latitudes (range 64N–38S) was conducted in 2004 and 2005 to determine the average levels of serum 25(OH)D and the prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy. A total of 2606 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (low bone mineral density, history of fragility fracture) seeking routine medical care were enrolled and serum 25(OH)D levels were measured at a single laboratory visit. Results. Mean serum 25(OH)D level was 26.8 ng mL−1 (SE 0.3) and ranged from 7 to 243 ng mL−1. Regional mean values were highest in Latin America (29.6 ng mL−1, SE 0.6) and lowest in the Middle East (20.4 ng mL−1, SE 0.5). Overall, 64% of women had serum levels <30 ng mL−1. Serum parathyroid hormone reached a nadir at serum 25(OH)D levels >35 ng mL−1. In nonequatorial countries, women recruited during the winter months had somewhat lower serum 25(OH)D levels than those recruited during the summer months in some, but not all, countries. Conclusions. Low levels of serum 25(OH)D are common amongst women with osteoporosis. The results underscore the value of assuring vitamin D adequacy in these women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01685.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
LIPS, P., HOSKING, D., LIPPUNER, K., NORQUIST, J. M., WEHREN, L., MAALOUF, G., RAGI‐EIS, S., & CHANDLER, J.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-26
Volume
260
Issue
3
Pages
245-254
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2021947980
Cited by
620
References
2
FWCI
18.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.