Cited by 44Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Examining factor structure of Maslach burnout inventory among nurses in Taiwan: Factor structure of MBI for nurses

Open access
LEE, HUAN-FANG, CHIEN, TSAIR-WEI, YEN, MIAOFEN·2013·Journal of Nursing Management

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the factorial structure of a Chinese version of the MBI-HSS for nurses in Taiwan. BACKGROUND Previous studies have presented different factorial structures using the Maslach burnout inventory-human services survey (MBI-HSS). METHODS: Secondary data analysis was implemented to explore the factor structure of MBI-HSS using exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was then performed to verify the modified structure for nurses in Taiwan. RESULTS: The EFA found that three factors explaining 57% of the variance were extracted, and 20 of the 22 items were retained. The goodness-of-fit test was performed using the CFA approach, and it was verified that the modified version of MBI-HSS is a suitable instrument for measuring burnout for nurses in Taiwan. CONCLUSIONS: A nationwide sample confirmed the factorial structure of MBI-HSS for nurses in Taiwan with a three-dimension, 20-item assessment, and the variance was not diminished in this sample. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: These findings demonstrate that the modified version of MBI-HSS provides a suitable instrument for measuring burnout for nurses in Taiwan. Therefore, the modified version of MBI-HSS can be used to compare burnout of nurses across cultures, providing valuable information for policies or preventions in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01427.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LEE, H.-F., CHIEN, T.-W., & YEN, M.
Affiliations
  • Chi Mei Medical Center (TW)
  • Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science (TW)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Venue
Journal of Nursing Management
Published
2012-07-07
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
648-656
ISSN
0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1720359923
Cited by
44
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 5
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, burnout, nurses, factor structure, Chinese version, psychometric validation, cross-cultural measurement, Taiwan
MeSH terms
Adult, Burnout, Professional, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Nurses, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Taiwan, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review