The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is feedback in clinical education?
Abstract
Objective Feedback is important in clinical education. However, the medical education literature provides no consensual definition of feedback. The aim of this study is to propose a consensual, research‐based, operational definition of feedback in clinical education. An operational definition is needed for educational practice and teacher training, and for research into the effectiveness of different types of feedback. Methods A literature search about definitions of feedback was performed in general sources, meta‐analyses and literature reviews in the social sciences and other fields. Feedback definitions given from 1995 to 2006 in the medical education literature are also reviewed. Results Three underlying concepts were found, defining feedback as ‘information’; as ‘reaction’, including information, and as a ‘cycle’, including both information and reaction. In most medical education and social science literature, feedback is usually conceptualised as information only. Comparison of feedback definitions in medical education reveals at least 9 different features. The following operational definition is proposed. Feedback is: ‘Specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance.’ Conclusions Different conceptual representations and the use of different key features might be a cause for inconsistent definitions of feedback. The characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of this research‐based operational definition are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Behavior, Purpose and Teleology
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/286788 · Cited by 1,624
The New Encyclopaedia Britannica
Goetz, P. W. (1991) · Cited by 1,592
Feedback in Clinical Medical Education
Ende, J. (1983) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340060055026 · Cited by 1,259
Ramaprasad, A. (1983) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830280103 · Cited by 915
SMITHER, J. W., LONDON, M., & REILLY, R. R. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x · Cited by 601
Marital Therapy Strategies Based On Social Learning & Behavior Exchange Principles
Jacobson, N. S., & Margolin, G. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 551
Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings
Irby, D. M. (1995) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199510000-00014 · Cited by 508
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Sheenan TJ, 1984, Feedback: giving and receiving, J Med Educ, 59, 913
- Isaacson JH, 1995, Resident perception of the evaluation process, J Gen Intern Med, 10, 89
- Oxford English Dictionary Online
- Good CV, 1973, Dictionary of Education, 227
- Weiner N, 1950, The Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society
- Nadler DA, 1977, Feedback and Organisational Development: Using Data‐based Methods
- 10.1007/978-1-4684-6328-6 · DOI
- Westberg J, 1991, A CIS Guidebook for Health Professions Teachers
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 682
Twelve tips for developing feedback literacy in health professions learners
Tripodi, N., Feehan, J., Wospil, R., & Vaughan, B. (2020) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2020.1839035 · Cited by 44
“Specifically, learners tend to disapprove of its informal, ad hoc and inconsistent nature (Van De Ridder et al. 2008), which can be further compounded by the high-pressure of clinical placement (Noble et al. 2020).”
BackgroundDeliberate practice as a framework for evaluating feedback in residency training
Gauthier, S. R., Cavalcanti, R. B., Goguen, J., & Sibbald, M. (2014) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2014.956059 · Cited by 45
“Many authors have described both process (Bing-You & Trowbridge 2009; Teunissen et al. 2009; Kluger & Van Dijk, 2010; Milan et al. 2011; Anderson 2012) and content (van de Ridder et al. 2008; Archer 2010) factors that are important in ensuring feedback results in improved performance.”
BackgroundQuality of feedback following performance assessments: does assessor expertise matter?
Govaerts, M., van de Wiel, M. W. J., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2013) · European journal of training and development · doi:10.1108/03090591311293310 · Cited by 45
Strijbos, J.-W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009) · Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-Based Education · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-392-0.ch018 · Cited by 48
Nesbitt, C. I., Phillips, A. W., Searle, R. F., & Stansby, G. P. (2015) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.12.013 · Cited by 44
Suhoyo, Y., van Hell, E. A., Prihatiningsih, T. S., Kuks, J. B. M., & Cohen‐Schotanus, J. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.853117 · Cited by 43
“…is considered to be most effective when it is systematically delivered from credible sources, discussed faceto-face in a safe environment, related to a specific standard and when it contains highly specific information (Ende 1983; Sachdeva 1996; Kilminster & Jolly 2000; van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundSuhoyo, Y., van Hell, E. A., Kerdijk, W., Emilia, O., Schönrock-Adema, J., Kuks, J. B. M., & Cohen‐Schotanus, J. (2017) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0904-5 · Cited by 45
Chan, L. K., Ganotice, F. A., Wong, F. K. Y., Lau, C. S., Bridges, S., Chan, C., Chan, N., Chan, P. W. L., Chen, H., Chen, J. Y., et al. (2017) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1046-5 · Cited by 42
“Students should also be given ample and timely feedback during their learning [18, 19].”
BackgroundNoordman, J., Verhaak, P. F. M., & van Dulmen, S. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.11.003 · Cited by 40
How to Give Feedback During Endoscopy Training
Dilly, C. K., & Sewell, J. L. (2017) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.023 · Cited by 40
Kruidering, M., O’Sullivan, P., & Chou, C. L. (2009) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-0983-z · Cited by 40
Direct Observation of Clinical Skills Feedback Scale: Development and Validity Evidence
Halman, S., Dudek, N. L., Wood, T. J., Pugh, D., Touchie, C., McAleer, S., & Humphrey-Murto, S. M. (2016) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2016.1186552 · Cited by 39
Park, J. H., Son, J. Y., Kim, S., & May, W. (2011) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2011.588735 · Cited by 39
“(Van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
An educational intervention to increase student engagement in feedback
McGinness, H. T., Caldwell, P. H. Y., Gunasekera, H., & Scott, K. M. (2020) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2020.1804055 · Cited by 42
Lerchenfeldt, S., & Taylor, T. A. H. (2020) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s250761 · Cited by 42
Individualized feedback during simulated laparoscopic training: a mixed methods study
Ahlborg, L., Weurlander, M., Hedman, L., Nisell, H., Lindqvist, P. G., Felländer‐Tsai, L., & Enochsson, L. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Education · doi:10.5116/ijme.55a2.218b · Cited by 37
Faculty staff‐guided versus self‐guided ultrasound training for internal medicine residents
Alba, G. A., Kelmenson, D. A., Noble, V. E., Murray, A. F., & Currier, P. F. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12259 · Cited by 36
Do trainees value feedback in case-based discussion assessments?
Mehta, F., Brown, J., & Shaw, N. J. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.731100 · Cited by 36
“Trainees also described CBDs where they received little or no feedback, although there may be a disparity between the assessor and trainee’s perception of what feedback is given, which has been described previously (Sender-Libermann et al. 2005; van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundHemming, P., Teague, P. J., Crowe, T. Y., & Levine, R. B. (2015) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-015-0158-7 · Cited by 36
“Educational literature suggests that feedback is most effective when it is specific, is based on expectations, is constructive to the learner’s performance, includes opportunities for dialogue, and when future observations with targeted feedback occur (Archer 2010; Van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundEngerer, C., Berberat, P. O., Dinkel, A., Rudolph, B., Sattel, H. C., & Wuensch, A. (2016) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0792-0 · Cited by 36
“A contemporary definition of feedback in medical education is as follows: ‘Specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance’ [5].”
Abraham, R. M., & Singaram, V. S. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1547-5 · Cited by 40
Goveia, J., van Stiphout, F., Cheung, Z. J., Kamta, B., Keijsers, C. J. P. W., Valk, G. D., & ter Braak, E. W. M. T. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.806984 · Cited by 41
“From an educational perspective feedback is specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance (van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundYarris, L. M., Fu, R. F., LaMantia, J., Linden, J. A., Hern, H. G., Lefebvre, C., Nestler, D. M., Tupesis, J. P., & Kman, N. E. (2011) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01055.x · Cited by 35
“A previous study showed that while faculty physicians define feedback as a process leading to a change in behavior, residents define it as an exchange of information.(17) Even though the intervention group received training on our working definition of feedback, residents may have valued the exchange of information mo…”
Fainstad, T. L., McClintock, A. H., der Ridder, M. J. V., Johnston, S. S., & Patton, K. K. (2018) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.3718 · Cited by 37
Interprofessional communication in a sociohierarchical culture: development of the TRI-O guide
Claramita, M., Riskiyana, R., Susilo, A. P., Huriyati, E., Wahyuningsih, M. S. H., & Norcini, J. J. (2019) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s196873 · Cited by 35
“The TRI-O model was introduced at an appropriate moment when the students felt knowledge gap.(31,32) Limitations Limitations of this study include how the pre–posttest design was conducted in a single institution and used a cross-sectional design rather than quasi-experimental research with a control group.”
MethodThe Quality of Operative Performance Narrative Feedback
Ahle, S. L., Eskender, M. H., Schuller, M. C., Carnes, E., Chen, X., Koehler, J. L., Willey, G., Latif, A., Doyle, J., Wnuk, G., et al. (2020) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000003907 · Cited by 34
“Annals of Surgery Volume 275, Number 3, March 2022 residents is highly variable in quality and quantity.(7) Attending surgeons continue to find it challenging to deliver specific and constructive feedback of observed performances, citing reasons such as time and fear of being labeled as intimidating or harassing.”
BackgroundFuentes‐Cimma, J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Riquelme, A. J., Villagrán, I., Isbej, L., Olivares-Labbe, M. T., & Heeneman, S. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05439-6 · Cited by 53
Comprehensive feedback on trainee surgeons' non-technical skills
Spanager, L., Dieckmann, P., Beier‐Holgersen, R., Rosenberg, J., & Østergaard, D. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Education · doi:10.5116/ijme.54b4.2196 · Cited by 34
Al-Jundi, W., Elsharif, M. E., Anderson, M., Chan, P., Beard, J. D., & Nawaz, S. (2016) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.011 · Cited by 34
Miles, A., Ginsburg, S., Sibbald, M., Tavares, W., Watling, C., & Stroud, L. F. (2020) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14426 · Cited by 34
Differentiation among bio- and augmented- feedback in technologically assisted rehabilitation
Morone, G., Ghooshchy, S. G., Palomba, A., Baricich, A., Santamato, A., Ciritella, C., Ciancarelli, I., Molteni, F., Gimigliano, F., Iolascon, G., et al. (2021) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2021.1927704 · Cited by 34
“behavior of an input is controlled by the margin of error at which the object stands at a given time with reference to a relatively specific goal (output) [28].”
BackgroundThe Impact of Feedback of Surgical Outcome Data on Surgical Performance: A Systematic Review
Maruthappu, M., Trehan, A., Barnett‐Vanes, A., McCulloch, P. G., & Carty, M. J. (2014) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2897-0 · Cited by 32
“[1 9 ] 2 0 0 8 U S A G y n ae co lo g y S u rg ic al m an ag em en t o f”
BackgroundMyers, K., & Chou, C. L. (2016) · Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health · doi:10.1111/jmwh.12505 · Cited by 34
Comparison of Debriefing Methods and Learning Outcomes in Human Patient Simulation
Gantt, L. T., Overton, S. H., Avery, J. J., Swanson, M., & Elhammoumi, C. V. (2018) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2017.11.012 · Cited by 33
Resident perceptions of Competency-Based Medical Education
Mann, S. M., Hastings‐Truelove, A., Beesley, T., Howden, S., & Egan, R. G. (2020) · Canadian Medical Education Journal · doi:10.36834/cmej.67958 · Cited by 37
Content and Conceptual Frameworks of Preceptor Feedback Related to Residents’ Educational Needs
Côté, L., & Bordage, G. (2012) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3182623073 · Cited by 31
Facilitation and Debriefing in Simulation Education
Bowe, S. N., Johnson, K., & Puscas, L. (2017) · Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.otc.2017.05.009 · Cited by 32
Choi, S., Oh, S., Lee, D. H., & Yoon, H. (2020) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02063-y · Cited by 40
Cleary, T. J., Dong, T., & Artino, A. R. (2014) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9549-x · Cited by 31
“…of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8085, USA e-mail: timothy.cleary@rutgers.edu T. Dong A. R. Artino Jr. Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Science, Bethesda, MD, USA”
BackgroundValidity evidence and reliability of a simulated patient feedback instrument
Schlegel, C., Woermann, U., Rethans, J., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2012) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-12-6 · Cited by 31
“Feedback is an important and valuable tool in interactive learning [4], and for our purposes, it may be defined as the provision of specific information on a student’s performance relative to a specific performance standard [5], with the intention of improving the student’s performance.”
BackgroundTeacher feedback and student learning: A quantitative study
Leung, A., Fine, P. D., Blizard, R., Tonni, I., & Louca, C. (2020) · European Journal Of Dental Education · doi:10.1111/eje.12637 · Cited by 31
Wouda, J. C., & van de Wiel, H. B. M. (2014) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.023 · Cited by 33
Reflections on feedback: Closing the loop
Ramani, S. (2015) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2015.1044950 · Cited by 30
“Why does this trend continue when so much has been written about techniques for giving feedback and more faculty development workshops are being organized on this very topic (van de Ridder et al. 2008; Krackov 2011; Krackov & Pohl 2011).”
Assessment of clinical feedback given to medical students via an electronic feedback system
Shaughness, G., Georgoff, P. E., Sandhu, G., Leininger, L., Nikolian, V. C., Reddy, R. M., & Hughes, D. T. (2017) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.055 · Cited by 31
Enhancing Feedback on Professionalism and Communication Skills in Anesthesia Residency Programs
Mitchell, J., Ku, C. M., Diachun, C. A. B., DiLorenzo, A. N., Lee, D. E., Karan, S., Wong, V., Schell, R. M., Brzeziński, M., & Jones, S. B. (2017) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000002143 · Cited by 28
Seifert, L. B., Socolan, O., Sader, R. A., Ruesseler, M., & Sterz, J. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1887-1 · Cited by 36
Effective and ineffective supervision in postgraduate dental education: a qualitative study.
Subramanian, J., Anderson, V., Morgaine, K., & Thomson, W. (2013) · European journal of dental education · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00774.x · Cited by 30
Engaging medical students in the feedback process
Rogers, D. A., Boehler, M. L., Schwind, C. J., Meier, A. H., Wall, J. C. H., & Brenner, M. J. (2011) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.009 · Cited by 30
Twelve tips for efficient procedural simulation
Rivière, É., Saucier, D., Lafleur, A., Lacasse, M., & Chiniara, G. (2017) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2017.1391375 · Cited by 33
“It can be defined as “specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve trainee’s performance” (van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundChaou, C., Monrouxe, L. V., Chang, L., Yu, S., Ng, C., Lee, C.-H., & Chang, Y. (2017) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2017.1366016 · Cited by 30
“Feedback has been defined as “specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance,” (van de Ridder et al. 2008) and is known to improve learners’ performance (Miller and Archer 2010).”
BackgroundLeadership-Specific Feedback Practices in Surgical Residency: A Qualitative Study
Vu, J. V.-T., Harbaugh, C. M., Roo, A. C. D., Biesterveld, B. E., Gauger, P. G., Dimick, J. B., & Sandhu, G. (2019) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.08.020 · Cited by 29
Supervision in Healthcare: A Critical Review of the Role, Function and Capacity for Training
Terry, D. R., Nguyen, H., Perkins, A. J., & Peck, B. (2020) · Universal Journal of Public Health · doi:10.13189/ujph.2020.080101 · Cited by 32
“193).[54] Formative feedback in the clinical setting may take on a number of features that include being on-going, two-way, meaningful to the situation, be credible, be highly specific, include self-assessment, while providing direction for improvement for the supervisee.”
BackgroundThe Educational Practices Construct of the NLN/Jeffries Simulation Framework: State of the Science
Hallmark, B. F., Thomas, C. M., & Gantt, L. T. (2013) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.006 · Cited by 30
Mubuuke, A. G., Louw, A., & Schalkwyk, S. C. V. (2016) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0507-y · Cited by 28
Douglas, T., Salter, S., Iglesias, M. A., Dowlman, M., & Eri, R. D. (2016) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.13.1.3 · Cited by 31
Feedback Credibility in Healthcare Education: a Systematic Review and Synthesis
Dai, C., Bertram, K., & Chahine, S. (2021) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-020-01167-w · Cited by 33
Taylor, J. A., Collins, D. J., & Cruickshank, A. (2021) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.2021-0037 · Cited by 30
How workplace‐based assessments guide learning in postgraduate education: A scoping review
Martin, L. J., Blissett, S., Johnston, B. K., Tsang, M., Gauthier, S. R., Ahmed, Z., & Sibbald, M. (2022) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14960 · Cited by 29
“Feedback within health professions education has been defined as ‘specific information about the comparison between a trainee's observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee's performance’.(69) As described above, WBA has enhanced feedback specificity and structure by defining those…”
BackgroundChallenges of providing timely feedback to residents: Faculty perspectives.
Zehra, T., Tariq, M., Ali, S. K., Motiwala, A., & Boulet, J. R. (2015) · PubMed · Cited by 27
Giving effective feedback in medical education
Qureshi, N. S. (2017) · The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist · doi:10.1111/tog.12391 · Cited by 28
George, R., Wells, H., & Cushing, A. M. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03415-6 · Cited by 26
Who Gives Feedback Matters: Student Biases Towards Human and AI ‐Generated Formative Feedback
Nazaretsky, T., Mejia‐Domenzain, P., Swamy, V., Frej, J., & Käser, T. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70153 · Cited by 26
Suhoyo, Y., Schönrock-Adema, J., Emilia, O., Kuks, J. B. M., & Cohen‐Schotanus, J. (2018) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1188-0 · Cited by 27
“Research has shown that feedback in a clinical setting is more effective if the following requirements are met: the feedback is specific in content by focusing on observable competencies, compares student performance to a standard, corrects performance deficiencies, and contains a plan of action to improve performance…”
BackgroundSuhoyo, Y., Schönrock-Adema, J., Rahayu, G. R., Kuks, J. B. M., & Cohen‐Schotanus, J. (2014) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2014.917160 · Cited by 26
“Before implementing the miniCEX (1-4) After i mplementing the miniCEX (1-4) MannWhitney test Before implementing the miniCEX (1-100) After implementing the mini-CEX (1-100) MannWhitney test”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAlHaqwi, A. I., Alwahbi, A., Abdulghani, H. M., & van der Molen, H. T. (2012) · Saudi Medical Journal · doi:10.15537/1658-3175.5553 · Cited by 26
“33 (5) Barriers to feedback in medical education .”
BackgroundMamtani, M., Shofer, F. S., Scott, K. R., Kaminstein, D. S., Eriksen, W., Takacs, M. E., Hall, A. K., Weiss, A. K., Walter, L. A., Gallahue, F. E., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43134 · Cited by 25
“Site 1 had the fewest narrative comments (men and women faculty provided a median [IQR] of 5 [1-13] and 5 [2-10], respectively), while site 3 had the most narrative comments (men and women faculty provided a median [IQR] of 50 [13-97] and 57 [31-124], respectively).”
BackgroundNottingham, S. L., & Henning, J. M. (2013) · Journal of Athletic Training · doi:10.4085/1062-6050-48.6.15 · Cited by 25
“These differences may stem from an inability of instructors to self-assess their behaviors or an inability of students to recognize feedback.(13,14) In addition to perceptions of feedback, several investigators in the areas of medical and athletic training(18,19) education have examined the factors that influence the…”
BackgroundEssentials of Debriefing and Feedback
Sawyer, T., Brett-Fleegler, M. B., & Eppich, W. (2016) · Comprehensive healthcare simulation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24187-6_3 · Cited by 28
Castro, M. A. B. E., de Almeida, R. L. M., Lucchetti, A. L. G., Tibiriçá, S. H. C., Ezequiel, O. D. S., & Lucchetti, G. (2021) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01443-3 · Cited by 24
de Jong, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., Schellekens, L. H., Kremer, W. D. J., Jonker, F. H., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03257-2 · Cited by 24
How well do faculty do in providing general surgery EPA feedback?
Layne, D., Jung, S. A., Varley, P. R., O’Rourke, A. P., & Minter, R. M. (2024) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115902 · Cited by 24
Feedback That Helps Trainees Learn to Practice Without Supervision
Bearman, M., Brown, J. B., Kirby, C. N., & Ajjawi, R. (2020) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000003716 · Cited by 26
Difficult incidents and tutor interventions in problem‐based learning tutorials
Kindler, P. M., Grant, C., Kulla, S., Poole, G., & Godolphin, W. J. (2009) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03423.x · Cited by 24
Faculty verbal evaluations reveal strategies used to promote medical student performance
Hauer, K. E., Mazotti, L. A., OʼBrien, B. C., Hemmer, P. A., & Tong, L. (2011) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.3402/meo.v16i0.6354 · Cited by 24
Torlén, K., Kurland, L., Olanders, K. J., Khoshegir, A., Kamil, H. A., Castrén, M. K., & Bohm, K. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059803 · Cited by 23
Undergraduate Medical Students’ Perceptions on Feedback-Seeking Behaviour
Oktaria, D., & Soemantri, D. (2018) · Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.21315/mjms2018.25.1.9 · Cited by 23
Competency-based teacher training: A systematic revision of a proven programme in medical didactics
Griewatz, J., Simon, M., & Lammerding‐Koeppel, M. (2017) · PubMed Central · doi:10.3205/zma001121 · Cited by 23
Soemantri, D., Nurokhmanti, H., Qomariyah, N. U., & Claramita, M. (2022) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-022-01597-8 · Cited by 25
“Feedback is defined as ‘specific information about the comparison between trainees’ observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainees’ performance’ [5].”
BackgroundAbbott, E., Thompson, W. S., Pandian, T. K., Zendejas, B., Farley, D. R., & Cook, D. A. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001924 · Cited by 24
van der Leeuw, R. M., Schipper, M. P., Heineman, M. J., & Lombarts, K. M. J. M. H. (2016) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133214 · Cited by 22
Gulbas, L. E., Guerin, W., & Ryder, H. F. (2016) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0660-y · Cited by 21
“Feedback is defined as “specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve trainee’s performance” [31] – it follows that a supervisor must know, and demonstrate knowledge, of both the trainee and a standard, to provide quality feedback su…”
BackgroundDebriefing: The state of the art and science in healthcare simulation
Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Sawyer, T., & Grant, V. J. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781119061656.ch21 · Cited by 22
Student reactions to AI versus human feedback in teamwork skills assessment
Kotlyar, I., & Krasman, J. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00555-9 · Cited by 21
Resident Perspective on Feedback and Barriers for Use as an Educational Tool
Albano, S., Quadri, S. A., Farooqui, M., Arangua, L., Clark, T., Fischberg, G. M., Tayag, E. C., & Siddiqi, J. (2019) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.4633 · Cited by 21
Delivery and use of individualised feedback in large class medical teaching
Burr, S. A., Brodier, E., & Wilkinson, S. (2013) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-63 · Cited by 21
Task‐ versus ego‐oriented feedback delivered as numbers or comments during intubation training
Manzone, J. C., Tremblay, L., You-Ten, K. E., Desai, D., & Brydges, R. (2014) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12397 · Cited by 21
Feedback during active learning: elementary school teachers’ beliefs and perceived problems
van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2013) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2013.767188 · Cited by 21
Feedback using an ePortfolio for medicine long cases: quality not quantity
Bleasel, J. F., Burgess, A. W., Weeks, R., & Haq, I. (2016) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0801-3 · Cited by 23
“Feedback is critical for learning in clinical medicine [10].”
BackgroundMedical Student Perceptions of Learner-Initiated Feedback Using a Mobile Web Application
Robertson, A. C., & Fowler, L. C. (2017) · Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · doi:10.1177/2382120517746384 · Cited by 21
Innovative use of simulated patients for educational purposes
Bokken, L. (2009) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20090304lb · Cited by 21
Feedback mapping—The curricular cornerstone of an “educational alliance.”
Murdoch-Eaton, D., & Bowen, L. (2017) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2017.1297892 · Cited by 20
“These contrary perceptions illustrate differing recollections of not only whether feedback has actually happened, but also whether the learner has recognized the feedback and how they may use it to construct meaning (Irby 1994; Van de Ridder et al. 2008; Murdoch-Eaton & Sargeant 2012).”
BackgroundSéance de simulation: du briefing au débriefing
Savoldelli, G. L., & Boet, S. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-2-8178-0469-9_32 · Cited by 20
Calibrated Peer Review for Interpreting Linear Regression Parameters: Results from a Graduate Course
Enders, F. B., Jenkins, S. M., & Hoverman, V. R. (2010) · Journal of Statistics Education · doi:10.1080/10691898.2010.11889489 · Cited by 20
“For each student, we were able to qualitatively identify a time during their CPR assignment in which they demonstrated this understanding.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWritten feedback on supervised learning events
Nesbitt, A., Pitcher, A., James, L., Sturrock, A. M., & Griffin, A. (2014) · The Clinical Teacher · doi:10.1111/tct.12145 · Cited by 20
Accounting Students' Feedback on Feedback in Australian Universities: They're Less Than Impressed
Watty, K., Lange, P. D., Carr, R. A., O’Connell, B., Howieson, B. A., & Jacobsen, B. (2013) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2013.823746 · Cited by 20
“Yet, there is some evidence that there are different conceptions of what constitutes feedback (see, for example, Black and William, 1998; Van de Ridder et al., 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialLiu, Y., Shi, C., Wu, L., Lin, X., Chen, X., Zhu, Y., Tan, H., & Zhang, W. (2025) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/73419 · Cited by 23
Twelve tips for institutional approach to outcome-based education in health professions programmes
Er, H. M., Nadarajah, V. D., Chen, Y. S., Misra, S., Perera, J., Ravindranath, S., & Yee, H. Y. (2019) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2019.1659942 · Cited by 20
Connolly, A., Goepfert, A. R., Blanchard, A. K., Buys, E. A., Donnellan, N. M., Amundsen, C. L., Galvin, S. L., & Kenton, K. S. (2018) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-17-00137.1 · Cited by 19
The Clinician-Educator's Handbook
Turner, T. L., Palazzi, D. L., Ward, M., & Lorin, M. I. (2010) · MedEdPORTAL · doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.7749 · Cited by 18
Lovasik, B. P., Fay, K. T., Patel, A. D., Stetler, J. L., Papandria, D., Santore, M. T., Davis, S. S., Lin, E., & Srinivasan, J. K. (2021) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.020 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Van De Ridder, J. M. M., Stokking, K. M., McGaghie, W. C., & Ten Cate, O. T. J.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Northwestern University (US)
- ORCID
- McGaghie, William C
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-22
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-197
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W1807214239
- Semantic Scholar
- e411b553fd3fa2a57ef58d5fd2f19a8d83f555a4
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- feedback, clinical teaching, operational definitions, trainee performance, performance standards, teacher professional development, feedback loops
- MeSH terms
- Education, Medical, Feedback, Social Sciences, Teaching, Clinical Medicine, Observation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review