The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is feedback in clinical education?
Abstract
Objective Feedback is important in clinical education. However, the medical education literature provides no consensual definition of feedback. The aim of this study is to propose a consensual, research‐based, operational definition of feedback in clinical education. An operational definition is needed for educational practice and teacher training, and for research into the effectiveness of different types of feedback. Methods A literature search about definitions of feedback was performed in general sources, meta‐analyses and literature reviews in the social sciences and other fields. Feedback definitions given from 1995 to 2006 in the medical education literature are also reviewed. Results Three underlying concepts were found, defining feedback as ‘information’; as ‘reaction’, including information, and as a ‘cycle’, including both information and reaction. In most medical education and social science literature, feedback is usually conceptualised as information only. Comparison of feedback definitions in medical education reveals at least 9 different features. The following operational definition is proposed. Feedback is: ‘Specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance.’ Conclusions Different conceptual representations and the use of different key features might be a cause for inconsistent definitions of feedback. The characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of this research‐based operational definition are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Behavior, Purpose and Teleology
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/286788 · Cited by 1,624
The New Encyclopaedia Britannica
Goetz, P. W. (1991) · Cited by 1,592
Feedback in Clinical Medical Education
Ende, J. (1983) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340060055026 · Cited by 1,259
Ramaprasad, A. (1983) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830280103 · Cited by 915
SMITHER, J. W., LONDON, M., & REILLY, R. R. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x · Cited by 601
Marital Therapy Strategies Based On Social Learning & Behavior Exchange Principles
Jacobson, N. S., & Margolin, G. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 551
Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings
Irby, D. M. (1995) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199510000-00014 · Cited by 508
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Sheenan TJ, 1984, Feedback: giving and receiving, J Med Educ, 59, 913
- Isaacson JH, 1995, Resident perception of the evaluation process, J Gen Intern Med, 10, 89
- Oxford English Dictionary Online
- Good CV, 1973, Dictionary of Education, 227
- Weiner N, 1950, The Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society
- Nadler DA, 1977, Feedback and Organisational Development: Using Data‐based Methods
- 10.1007/978-1-4684-6328-6 · DOI
- Westberg J, 1991, A CIS Guidebook for Health Professions Teachers
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–682 of 682
Elçin, M. (2022) · Akademisyen Kitabevi eBooks · doi:10.37609/akya.2282
Factors Impacting OT and OTA Student Feedback Use during Level II Fieldwork Experiences
Hatkevich, B. A., Pottkotter, E. R., & Stotz, N. L. (2022) · Journal of Occupational Therapy Education · doi:10.26681/jote.2022.060409
Wiebe, D., Zulla, R. T., & Ross, S. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2548626/v1
Wiryadi, F. C. (2023) · Jurnal Ilmiah JKA (Jurnal Kesehatan Aeromedika) · doi:10.58550/jka.v9i1.193
This Encounter Isn’t Over Yet: The Importance of Debriefing
Neeley, M., Crook, T. W., & Gigante, J. (2023) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2023-063198
Eine Schlüsselfigur im Spital, die gestärkt werden muss
Perrig, M., Breitenstein, S., & Roten, C. (2023) · Swiss Medical Forum ‒ Schweizerisches Medizin-Forum · doi:10.4414/smf.2023.09469
Un personnage clé de l’hôpital qui doit être renforcé
Perrig, M., Breitenstein, S., & Roten, C. (2023) · Forum Médical Suisse ‒ Swiss Medical Forum · doi:10.4414/fms.2023.09469
Wahyuningsih, K. A., Prastowo, N. A., Juliawati, V. D. J., & Ardianto, C. (2023) · Springer Proceedings in Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-4573-3_12
Feedback as Formative Practice
Gerhardson, A. N. (2024) · IAMSE manuals · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52921-4_3
Two-Way Communication: The Course and Educator Evaluation Process
Gerhardson, A. N. (2024) · IAMSE manuals · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52921-4_6
Resident Milestones, Assessments, and Feedback
Noronha, C. F., Catalanotti, J. S., & Marcus, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40273-9_10
Giving Feedback and Filling Out Evaluations for Medical Students and Residents
Bindra, M., & Werley, E. B. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47873-4_46
Rajendran, R., & Subramanian, Y. R. (2024) · Advances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1123-3.ch002
Exploring the Holistic Process of How Students Use Feedback in Clinical Clerkship
Pinasthika, A., Mustika, R., & Menaldi, S. L. (2024) · Education in Medicine Journal · doi:10.21315/eimj2024.16.1.11
“This echoes the findings of van de Ridder et al. (6), who argued that observation is a key element in feedback definition.”
BackgroundAlthans, A. R., Hashimi, B., Rosas, S. R., Hulme, M., Rosengart, M. R., Schuchert, V. D., & Myers, S. (2024) · Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education · doi:10.1007/s44186-024-00282-1 · Cited by 1
“In medical education, evaluation and feedback allows for comparison of a student’s performance to an accepted standard and is integral to the development of clinical and technical competency [1, 2].”
Exodontia curriculum evaluation: fit for purpose teaching and learning strategies
Behardien, N., Titus, S., & Roman, N. V. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1398699
“In a clinical context, feedback is defined as ‘specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance’ (Van De Ridder et al., 2008).”
Alkattan, R., & Alreshaid, L. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.68309
Supporting Older Adult Simulated Participants to Provide Feedback to Learners
Smith, C. M., Alsaba, N., Nestel, D., & Sokoloff, L. G. (2024) · Comprehensive healthcare simulation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-65742-9_6
Optimizing dental students’ use of feedback: Validation of a theoretical model
Sallam, A. A., Abdulmohsen, B., & Ellis, J. S. (2024) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/jdd.13774
Keshwani, K., Byrne, M. H. V., & Ntatsaki, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780192848710.003.0008
Does cross-sectional imaging diminish the utility of surgical handover for trainee assessment?
Costello, L., Toale, C., Mohammed, F., & Ridgway, P. F. (2025) · The Surgeon · doi:10.1016/j.surge.2025.04.053
Spezieller Teil: Umsetzung der kompetenzbasierten Weiterbildung in die Praxis
Ludwig, J., & Schorlemmer, J. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-3-437-21027-3.00002-8
Sennekamp, M., Kollewe, T., & Ochsendorf, F. R. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-70777-7_5
Karp, A. M., Swan, M., Fara, M. G., & Stein, L. A. (2025) · Educational research in medical sciences · doi:10.5812/ermsj-161318
Ward, M., Morrison, L. J., ffrench, C., & Wirtzfeld, D. A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-86312-7_10
Nair, H. B. (2025) · The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas · doi:10.1080/00098655.2025.2557852
“Individual feedback is specific information regarding a student’s performance compared to a standard, intended to foster improvement (van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
Feedback quality in the surgery clerkship: perspectives of surgery clerkship leadership
Picart, J. K., Talwar, C., Ashebo, L., Sarquiz, J. M., Crowley, E. V., Aubry, S. T., & Underwood, H. J. (2025) · Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education · doi:10.1007/s44186-025-00393-3
Using entrustment-supervision scales in anaesthetic assessments
Hughes, W., Westall, H., & Gale, T. C. E. (2025) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2025.08.062
Formative Feedback for Students in Problem-Based Learning
Lorenzo, S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05405-0_7
Beyond the Grade: Exploring Written Feedback in a Pediatric Clerkship
Scholl, S. R., Judd, C. A., & MacMahon, A. L. (2025) · Military Medicine · doi:10.1093/milmed/usaf579
Bal, C. G., & Elagöz, M. (2025) · Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.20875/makusobed.1701021
Self-Directed Learning and Feedback with Blended Training in Paediatric EmergenciesPreprint
Ngobese, M., Bagwandeen, C., & Naidoo, K. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7849481/v1
Allen, R., de Vries, I., Murray, T. M. M., Ball, N., McGuire, A., Mann, S. M., Mizubuti, G. B., Szász, P., & Zevin, B. (2025) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103803
De Invloed van Docentgedrag op Kwaliteit van Reflectie van Leerlingen in het Voortgezet Onderwijs
Bonouvrie, N. R. (2011) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Frey, M. (2011) · Electronic Theses of LMU Munich (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) · doi:10.5282/edoc.13614
Enhancing Clinical Education with Student Feedback: a Thai Perspective
Iramaneerat, C. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781780634333.61
Fuentes‐Cimma, J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Riquelme, A., Villagran, I., Isbej, L., Olivares-Labbe, M. T., & Heeneman, S. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26710406
Najaffard, N., Mohammadi, A., Mojtahedzadeh, R., & Zarei, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25150660
Fuentes‐Cimma, J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Riquelme, A., Villagran, I., Isbej, L., Olivares-Labbe, M. T., & Heeneman, S. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26710409
Tomas, N., Masiello, I., Broberger, E., & Veronica, L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26758685
George, R., Wells, H., & Cushing, A. M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19704027
Kurz, S., Lohse, J. A., Buggenhagen, H., Schmidtmann, I., Laufenberg–Feldmann, R., & Engelhard, K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14121930
Romero, Y. R., Tame, H., Holzhausen, Y., Petzold, M., Wyszynski, J.-V., Peters, H., Alhassan-Altoaama, M., Domańska, M., & Dittmar, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14833125
Romero, Y. R., Tame, H., Holzhausen, Y., Petzold, M., Wyszynski, J.-V., Peters, H., Alhassan-Altoaama, M., Domańska, M., & Dittmar, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14833134
de Jong, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., Schellekens, L. H., Kremer, W. D. J., Jonker, F. H., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19920977
Haruta, J., Nakajima, R., & Monkawa, T. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25583890
Additional file 1 of Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy
Burgess, A. W., Roberts, C., Lane, S., Haq, I., Clark, T., Kalman, E., Pappalardo, N., & Bleasel, J. F. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.15161904
Romero, Y. R., Tame, H., Holzhausen, Y., Petzold, M., Wyszynski, J.-V., Peters, H., Alhassan-Altoaama, M., Domańska, M., & Dittmar, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14833128
Nisar, S., Mahboob, U., Khan, R. A., & Rehman, D. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16807606
de Jong, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., Schellekens, L. H., Kremer, W. D. J., Jonker, F. H., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19920974
Kurz, S., Lohse, J. A., Buggenhagen, H., Schmidtmann, I., Laufenberg–Feldmann, R., & Engelhard, K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14121927
Aldinç, H., Gün, C., Yaylacı, S., Senuren, C. O., Güven, F., Şahiner, M., Kayayurt, K., & Türkmen, S. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20070762
Tomas, N., Masiello, I., Broberger, E., & Veronica, L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26758688
Romero, Y. R., Tame, H., Holzhausen, Y., Petzold, M., Wyszynski, J.-V., Peters, H., Alhassan-Altoaama, M., Domańska, M., & Dittmar, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14833131
Vanyolos, E., Lidak, E., Boros, M., Kósa, K., Gomori, G., Orosz, N., Pető, K., & Németh, N. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08479-8
“Others also have shown that immediate feedback, together with the use of visual aids are effective in improving both performance and motivation [24].”
Wilhelm, S. K., Nida, J., Ivascu, F. A., Nguyen, N., & Novotny, N. M. (2026) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103835
Lapierre, V., Côté, A.-C. M. T., Burnier, I., & Bouchard-Lamothe, D. (2026) · Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · doi:10.1177/23821205261423394
The development and validation of an assessment rubric for pars plana vitrectomy
Lai, D., Li, Y., Xiao, B., Feng, L., Xu, W., Guo, Y., Long, J., Xu, W., Cui, J., Cheng, Y., et al. (2026) · Global Medical Education · doi:10.1515/gme-2025-0014
“Its adoption is anticipated to facilitate the development of more skilled and confident surgeons in PPV, ultimately leading to superior surgical performance and better patient outcomes [32].”
Brodowski, H., Kinyara, M. M., Göbel, L., Edert, F., Dammermann, A., Strutz, N., & Roese, K. (2026) · Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · doi:10.1177/23821205261431560
“13 Feedback has been described as speci fi c information comparing a trai-nee ’ s observed performance to a standard to guide improvement 14 or more broadly as an ongoing dialogue to support learner re fl ection and performance change.”
Qin, W., Xu, F., Gu, C., Xiaomeng, Y. A. N. G., Yu, Y., Peng, J., Li, J., & Hu, B. Y. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102215 · Cited by 1
Gil, A. R., Hughes, P. T., Scheffel, J., & Reis, T. B. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6508552
Common Challenges in IPECP Clinical Supervision: A Critical Analysis
Babar, M. G., & Nimbalkar, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6953-3_11
Giving Is Receiving: Mastering the Art of Feedback in Radiology Training
Fung, K. F. K., Ansari, S., Azhideh, A., Hosni, N. D., & Miao, J. H. (2026) · Radiographics · doi:10.1148/rg.250176
Wu, Z., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Jiang, X., Di, P., & Yi, C. (2026) · Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2026.04.026
Betancuer, Y. L., Muñoz, W. A. V., Gallego-Quintero, S., Higuita‐Gutiérrez, L. F., & Ramírez, D. A. M. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.102405
Gaba, D. M., Howard, S. K., & Burden, A. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-11506-6.00004-2
Cabitza, F., & Vicente, L. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103855 · Cited by 2
Optimizing Surgical Performance: Evidence-Based Feedback Strategies for Trainees and Junior Staff
Heath, D., Kim, K., Pardhan, A., & Cover, J. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.111316
“Effective feedback is generally described as possessing several essential characteristics [4,6,24].”
InfluentialZhao, Z., Liu, Z., Guo, L., Pan, T., Zhang, Y., Miao, C., Ge, Y., Wang, Y., Hu, X., Wang, X., et al. (2026) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/98949 · Cited by 3
Conrad, P. V., Karsten, G., Beckmann, J. H., Becker, T., Klomp, H.-J., Alkatout, İ., & Linecker, M. (2026) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.104052
Simon, C., Otmane, S., & Chellali, A. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3831413
Alhaskir, M., Haven, H., Langner, M., Arasteh, S. T., Heidemeyer, H., Sacic, N., Majeed, R. W., Peters, A., Müller, N., Fries, M., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10282455/v1
Borzabadi‐Farahani, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1890078
Jolbäck, P., Mohaddes, M., & Sundberg, F. (2026) · Bone & Joint Open · doi:10.1302/2633-1462.79.bjo-2026-0082
Imaezue, G. C., Davis, C., King, C., Jaouhari, M. E., Gorajec, K., Glass, E., & Ajayi, D. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.110975
Yu, Z., Cheng, K., Liu, J., Hu, M., & Cai, Z. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10712055/v1
Wu, Z., & Li, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1812146
“Conventional expert-led commentary, delivered retrospectively during weekly review sessions, is inherently non-individualized and temporally divorced from the cognitive moment of decision-making, limiting its capacity to correct reasoning deviations at the point of formation (9, 10).”
周, 启. (2026) · Vocational Education · doi:10.12677/ve.2026.1510419
Discussing writing : peer feedback on writing essays in an online forum for learners of English
Tuomey, E. (2014) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Van De Ridder, J. M. M., Stokking, K. M., McGaghie, W. C., & Ten Cate, O. T. J.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Northwestern University (US)
- ORCID
- McGaghie, William C
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-22
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-197
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W1807214239
- Semantic Scholar
- e411b553fd3fa2a57ef58d5fd2f19a8d83f555a4
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- feedback, clinical teaching, operational definitions, trainee performance, performance standards, teacher professional development, feedback loops
- MeSH terms
- Education, Medical, Feedback, Social Sciences, Teaching, Clinical Medicine, Observation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review