The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is feedback in clinical education?
Abstract
Objective Feedback is important in clinical education. However, the medical education literature provides no consensual definition of feedback. The aim of this study is to propose a consensual, research‐based, operational definition of feedback in clinical education. An operational definition is needed for educational practice and teacher training, and for research into the effectiveness of different types of feedback. Methods A literature search about definitions of feedback was performed in general sources, meta‐analyses and literature reviews in the social sciences and other fields. Feedback definitions given from 1995 to 2006 in the medical education literature are also reviewed. Results Three underlying concepts were found, defining feedback as ‘information’; as ‘reaction’, including information, and as a ‘cycle’, including both information and reaction. In most medical education and social science literature, feedback is usually conceptualised as information only. Comparison of feedback definitions in medical education reveals at least 9 different features. The following operational definition is proposed. Feedback is: ‘Specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance.’ Conclusions Different conceptual representations and the use of different key features might be a cause for inconsistent definitions of feedback. The characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of this research‐based operational definition are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Behavior, Purpose and Teleology
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/286788 · Cited by 1,624
The New Encyclopaedia Britannica
Goetz, P. W. (1991) · Cited by 1,592
Feedback in Clinical Medical Education
Ende, J. (1983) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340060055026 · Cited by 1,259
Ramaprasad, A. (1983) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830280103 · Cited by 915
SMITHER, J. W., LONDON, M., & REILLY, R. R. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x · Cited by 601
Marital Therapy Strategies Based On Social Learning & Behavior Exchange Principles
Jacobson, N. S., & Margolin, G. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 551
Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings
Irby, D. M. (1995) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199510000-00014 · Cited by 508
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Sheenan TJ, 1984, Feedback: giving and receiving, J Med Educ, 59, 913
- Isaacson JH, 1995, Resident perception of the evaluation process, J Gen Intern Med, 10, 89
- Oxford English Dictionary Online
- Good CV, 1973, Dictionary of Education, 227
- Weiner N, 1950, The Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society
- Nadler DA, 1977, Feedback and Organisational Development: Using Data‐based Methods
- 10.1007/978-1-4684-6328-6 · DOI
- Westberg J, 1991, A CIS Guidebook for Health Professions Teachers
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 682
Lee, A., Compagna, K., Gerven, P. W. M. V., Heeneman, S., & Ross, S. (2026) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2026.2681190 · Cited by 1
Jeong, I. H., Kim, H., & Hwang, H. (2026) · Kosin Medical Journal · doi:10.7180/kmj.26.173 · Cited by 1
“Traditionally, delivering such detailed real-time feedback has required significant faculty time and continuous observation [73].”
Prasad, P., Amin, M., Sari, E. F., Annamma, L. M., Jayaraj, K. N., Yasothkumar, D., & Ahmed, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Dental Medicine · doi:10.3389/fdmed.2026.1874590 · Cited by 1
Feedback and Feedback Culture in Medical Education: Evolution, Evidence, and Emerging Horizons
Peterec, K., Kazmir, S., Chartash, D., & Phatak, U. P. (2026) · International Medical Education · doi:10.3390/ime5030071 · Cited by 2
“A well-accepted understanding is that feedback is the “comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance” [2].”
Quality of Radiotherapy Care by Development of E-Feedback Knowledge
Siekkinen, M. (2014) · Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare · Cited by 1
Diggelen, V. M., & Funk, M. (2015) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 1
Côté, L., & Gingras, N. (2013) · Pédagogie médicale · doi:10.1051/pmed/2013048 · Cited by 1
iContact: The Digital Feedback Process in a University Setting
Wilson, K. M., & Friedrich, L. A. (2015) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 1
Feedback and Debriefing in Mastery Learning
Shakeri, N., Salzman, D. H., Adler, M., & Eppich, W. (2020) · Comprehensive healthcare simulation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34811-3_8 · Cited by 1
Tutor-demonstrated feedback in the mini-clinical evaluation exercise
Bhattarai, M. D., & McAleer, S. (2020) · MedEdPublish · doi:10.15694/mep.2020.000130.1 · Cited by 1
Licata, S., Tullio, A., & Valent, F. (2020) · Emergency Care Journal · doi:10.4081/ecj.2020.9201 · Cited by 1
Kappy, B., Statile, A. M., Schumacher, D. J., Lendrum, E. C., & Herrmann, L. E. (2021) · Academic Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.023 · Cited by 1
Advising the “Gunner”: The Student with Noncognitive Learning Difficulties
Kilby, K. A. (2014) · The AMA Journal of Ethic · doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.03.ecas3-1403 · Cited by 1
Fang, T., Hsu, S., Su, J., & Wang, P. (2023) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update · doi:10.1016/j.cmpbup.2023.100102 · Cited by 1
“Feedback is essential for effective learning and improvement of performance [31].”
BackgroundO papel do feedback extrínseco no futebol: uma revisão integrativa com enfoque nos jogadores
Silva, E. H. A., & Drews, R. (2023) · Retos · doi:10.47197/retos.v50.96839 · Cited by 1
Schoenherr, J. R., Chiou, E. K., & Goldshtein, M. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-15988-6.00003-0 · Cited by 1
Haruta, J., Nakajima, R., & Monkawa, T. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05386-2 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Patient Care Through Interprofessional Education and Simulation-Based Learning
Tjeng, R., Vitória, P., Lito, P., Sá, J., Fonseca, A. M., Gouveia, A. I. R., Simões, P. A., Raimundo, R., Neto, I., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2025) · Advances in medical education, research, and ethics (AMERE) book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1127-2.ch007 · Cited by 1
Higgins, R. M., & Brasel, K. J. (2025) · Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education · doi:10.1007/s44186-025-00366-6 · Cited by 1
ACTIVE LEARNING MANIFESTED WITHIN A SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE CLASSROOM
Oberg, A. M. (2015) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 1
Chen, J. K.-H., Chen, C., Tzeng, P.-C., & Liu, H. (2014) · American Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12691/education-2-8-19 · Cited by 1
“In clinical education, feedback is defined as: “specific information about the comparison between a trainee's observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance” [8].”
BackgroundThe clinical teacher’s toolkit: Clinical teaching with emotional intelligence
Omid, A., Haghani, F., & Adibi, P. (2016) · Journal of Research in Medical Sciences · Cited by 1
Muessig, M., Sterz, J., Stefanescu, M., Bender, B., Hoefer, S. H., & Ruesseler, M. (2017) · Journal of Advances in Education Research · doi:10.22606/jaer.2017.23007 · Cited by 1
Funk, M., & van Diggelen, M. (2017) · International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijwltt.2017100107 · Cited by 1
Żechowicz, M., Gromadziński, L., Dudziński, L., Grabarczyk, Ł., Żechowicz, T., Zabłocki, M., Warmia and Mazury Chamber of Physicians, O., & Zaborowski, P. (2018) · Polish Annals of Medicine · doi:10.29089/2017.17.00002 · Cited by 1
Simulation for Procedural Tasks
Rivière, É., Asselin, M., Lafleur, A., & Chiniara, G. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815657-5.00027-9 · Cited by 1
Sanatani, M. S., Potvin, K., Conter, H. J., Trudgeon, K., & Warner, A. (2020) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02158-6 · Cited by 1
Naicker, K., Govender, K., & Singaram, V. (2021) · Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia · doi:10.36303/sajaa.2021.27.4.2569 · Cited by 1
The Encounters of Clinical Teaching in Hierarchical and Collectivistic Contexts
Suhoyo, Y., & Emilia, O. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7232-3_4 · Cited by 1
Workplace-based assessment in clinical radiology in the UK - a validity study
Page, M. (2016) · Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) · Cited by 1
Simulated and standardized patients in health profession education
Schlegel, C. (2016) · doi:10.26481/dis.20160608cs · Cited by 5
Avaliação do feedback como ferramenta de ensino e aprendizagem em um curso de Medicina
Peixoto, M. C. E. (2019) · doi:10.14393/ufu.di.2019.2447 · Cited by 1
Meyer, I. S. (2013) · SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) · Cited by 1
Formative feedback in a virtual patient simulator for clinical audiology training
Guard, L. M. (2013) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.26021/6383
Hunt, E. A., Fiedor, M., & Eppich, W. (2008) · Clínicas pediátricas de Norteamérica · doi:10.1016/s0186-159x(08)55072-8
Becker, G. E. (2008) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Ramani, S. (2015) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3258-x
Feedback tijdens coschappen: graag meer en beter!
van Hirtum, P. V., Woittiez, L. R., Tempelaar, W. M., Lak, N. S. M., & van Groenendael, L. (2011) · Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs · doi:10.1007/s12507-011-0052-6
Stanhope, J., & Gill, R. (2015) · Focus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional Journal · doi:10.11157/fohpe.v16i2.73
“Despite the widely accepted view that feedback is required for learning (Archer 2010; Shute, 2008; van de Ridder et al., 2008), this review found little evidence to support the use of terminal feedback in improving the practical, clinical skills exhibited in simulated environments by…”
BackgroundAchtergronden bij de Richtlijn korte praktijkbeoordeling
ten Cate, O., & Fluit, C. R. M. G. (2010) · Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs · doi:10.1007/s12507-010-0129-7
Carrió, F. B., Rabassó, J. D. P., Pujol-Farriols, R., & Gudiol-Munté, F. (2011) · Educación Médica · doi:10.4321/s1575-18132011000100006
The Instructor's Feedback Dilemma in DebriefingVA Case Study
Rudolph, J. W., Foldy, E. G., Robinson, T., Kendall, S., Taylor, S. S., & Simon, R. (2013)
A Qualitative Study Of Formative Assessment Practices In An Internal Medicine Clerkship Course
Gibson, M. C. (2013) · QSpace (Queen's University Library)
De l’apprentissage et de la rétroaction
Allen, V. M. (2014) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30582-x
Non-sexist grammar in medical literature.
Kalivas, J. (1994) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central)
Allen, V. M. (2014) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30581-8
The Development of a Workplace-Based Surgical Clinic Assessment Tool
Rekman, J. F. (2016) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-4969
Shorbagi, S. (2015) · Figshare · doi:10.25419/rcsi.10813532
An analysis of large-Scale numeracy assessment data in Australia
Morley, P. (2017) · Figshare · doi:10.4225/03/58ae2d8636ebe
Griffiths, J. M., Luhanga, U., McEwen, L. A., Schultz, K., & Dalgarno, N. (2016) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central)
Guidance on feedback of outcome data to improve performance in vascular surgery
Li, M., Shalhoub, J., Davies, A. H., & Maruthappu, M. (2016) · British Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.12968/hmed.2016.77.8.476
Brochmann, N. D., Haugtomt, S., Kennedy, L. H., & Kvello, M. (2016) · Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening · doi:10.4045/tidsskr.16.0745
Brovender, A. (2015) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Providing Effective Feedback within Pharmacy Practice Education
Yoon, J.-H. (2017) · Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.24304/kjcp.2017.27.2.55
Hayes, V., Bing‐You, R. G., Varaklis, K., Trowbridge, R. L., Kemp, H., & McKelvy, D. J. (2018) · Education for Primary Care · doi:10.1080/14739879.2018.1424566
Simulation in ENT- Is There a Place For It?
Dione, L. (2017) · Journal of Head Neck & Spine Surgery · doi:10.19080/jhnss.2017.01.555553
“[27] define feedback as an activity that involves the giving of specific information around a trainee’s observed performance given with the intent to improve their performance.”
BackgroundSennekamp, M., Kollewe, T., & Ochsendorf, F. R. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-56305-2_5
Images of Student Experiences on Social Media: The Case of International Branch Campuses in Dubai
Husein, U. M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74739-2_11
Empowering Novice Teachers Through Blended Feedback
İnce, B. H. (2018) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5228-4.ch005
Febria, N. D., Claramita, M., & Widyandana, W. (2018) · Insisiva Dental Journal Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Insisiva · doi:10.18196/di.7190
Swinging the Pendulum from Recipes to Relationships
Ramani (2018) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20181031sr · Cited by 1
A ROLE OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT FEEDBACK IN MEDICAL TEACHING EVALUATION: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY.
Ramakoteswara Rao, N., & Shah, I. P. (2019) · International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies · doi:10.32553/ijmbs.v3i8.497
“Feedback could be defined in clinical education as: “specific information about the comparison between trainees’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance”.(2)”
BackgroundMaximizing Effective Feedback and End-of-Course Evaluations
Kogan, J. R. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31957-1_11
STRUCTURED, INDIVIDUALIZED, VIDEO-BASED COACHING TO IMPROVE TECHNICAL SKILL ACQUISITION
Lynch, K. A. (2020) · Digital Commons - URI (University of Rhode Island) · doi:10.23860/diss-lynch-kenneth-2020
Metodologia clinica oggi nel paziente internistico complesso
Nardi, G. E. R., Gnerre, P., Fontanella, A., & Manfellotto, D. (2020) · Italian Journal of Medicine · doi:10.4081/itjm.q.2020.1
Varas, J., Achurra, P., Jarry, C., Navia, A., Tejos, R., Pozo, P., & Inzunza, M. (2020) · Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica · doi:10.35366/95229
Evaluation of Internship Feedback (A Quantitative Study)
Layık, M. E., & Korkmaz, D. (2020) · Van Medical Journal · doi:10.5505/vtd.2020.92053
Core Research Topics of Studies on Personalized Feedback in the Past Four Decades
Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Xie, H., Wang, F. L., & Wong, L. P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59413-8_10
Dancing With Feedback: Inquiry-based Feedback and Teacher Learning
Conley, S. P. (2020) · doi:10.7916/d8-hyk6-8789
Hanafi, M., Randita, A. B. T., Maryani, M., & Ardyanto, T. D. (2021) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s282400
“In addition, not all students are aware of the problems within themselves, so peer-reflection provides opportunity for the type of student with self-insight who does not know his own problem from the perspective of others.(11) With this openness, problems that have not been identified by the mentor will emerge.”
BackgroundZhang, S., Phu, J., Xu, P., Wang, H., Kalloniatis, M., & Zangerl, B. (2021) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12795
“Through the implementation of debrief and feedback sessions, 27,28 it also encourages reflec-tive learning 29 and high order thinking.”
Роль зворотного зв’язку зі слухачами-анестезіологами в оцінці викладача
Лоскутов, О. А., Markov, Y. I., & Krasnov, V. (2021) · EMERGENCY MEDICINE · doi:10.22141/2224-0586.17.2.2021.230656
van de Ridder, M. (2011) · Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs · doi:10.1007/s12507-011-0027-7
Malik, A., Kiran, F., & Farooq, F. (2021) · Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal · doi:10.51253/pafmj.v71i5.6645
Digital unterstütztes Peer-Feedback im Dermatologie-Praktikum
Barahona, D. M. C. (2021) · doi:10.21248/gups.62687
Comparison of Self Versus Expert-assisted Feedback for Cricothyroidotomy TrainingPreprint
Aldinç, H., Yaylacı, S., Gün, C., Senuren, C. O., Güven, F., Şahiner, M., Kayayurt, K., & Türkmen, S. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-959406/v1
Forrest, K., & McKimm, J. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119604020.ref
Learning and Teaching in Pediatrics
Nataraja, R. M., Blackburn, S. C., & Roseby, R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7_68-1
Videogravação e videofeedback no ensino-aprendizagem de habilidades de exame físico
Oliveira, L. C., da Paz, F. L. L., Medeiros, A. A. A., Conceição, E. P., Guimarães, A. C. C., & Pinto, A. S. B. (2022) · Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica · doi:10.1590/1981-5271v46.1-20210141
Comparison of Self Versus Expert-assisted Feedback for Cricothyroidotomy TrainingPreprint
Aldinç, H., Gün, C., Yaylacı, S., Senuren, C. O., Güven, F., Şahiner, M., Kayayurt, K., & Türkmen, S. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-959406/v2
Achtergronden bij de Richtlijn feedback in de medische vervolgopleiding
van Loghum, B. S. (2011) · Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs · doi:10.1007/s12507-011-0034-8
Davis, M., McKimm, J., & Forrest, K. (2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118523469.ch4
Seymour-Walsh, A. E. (2019) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26792-6_5
May, W., Fisher, D. L., & Souder, D. (2012) · Medical Education Development · doi:10.4081/ed.2012.e3
Challenges of Peer Assisted Learning in online clinical skills training of Ophthalmology modulePreprint
Nisar, S., Mahboob, U., Khan, R. A., & Rehman, D. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-70716/v1
Anseel, F. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199846740-0112
Soesilowati, D., Raharjo, T. J., Yulianto, A., & Yanto, H. (2022) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.211125.061
Teacher feedback-based collaborative group-testing improve students’ knowledge gaps of parasitologyPreprint
Peng, X., Jiang, L., Cao, D., Chen, G., Li, D., Teng, P., & Li, J. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1852603/v1
“Teaching feedback is an essential measure to realize the purposeful control of teaching, improve teaching quality and e�ciency, and ensure the virtuous circle of teaching activities [11].”
Surgical Training and Feedback
Biyani, C. S., Tomlinson, J. E., & Thornton, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12213-2_15
Une étude exploratoire des besoins de formation de formateurs novices en simulation
Magnin, F., & Delacour, C. (2022) · Pédagogie médicale · doi:10.1051/pmed/2022020
Metadata
- Authors
- Van De Ridder, J. M. M., Stokking, K. M., McGaghie, W. C., & Ten Cate, O. T. J.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Northwestern University (US)
- ORCID
- McGaghie, William C
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-22
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-197
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W1807214239
- Semantic Scholar
- e411b553fd3fa2a57ef58d5fd2f19a8d83f555a4
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- feedback, clinical teaching, operational definitions, trainee performance, performance standards, teacher professional development, feedback loops
- MeSH terms
- Education, Medical, Feedback, Social Sciences, Teaching, Clinical Medicine, Observation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review