The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is feedback in clinical education?
Abstract
Objective Feedback is important in clinical education. However, the medical education literature provides no consensual definition of feedback. The aim of this study is to propose a consensual, research‐based, operational definition of feedback in clinical education. An operational definition is needed for educational practice and teacher training, and for research into the effectiveness of different types of feedback. Methods A literature search about definitions of feedback was performed in general sources, meta‐analyses and literature reviews in the social sciences and other fields. Feedback definitions given from 1995 to 2006 in the medical education literature are also reviewed. Results Three underlying concepts were found, defining feedback as ‘information’; as ‘reaction’, including information, and as a ‘cycle’, including both information and reaction. In most medical education and social science literature, feedback is usually conceptualised as information only. Comparison of feedback definitions in medical education reveals at least 9 different features. The following operational definition is proposed. Feedback is: ‘Specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance.’ Conclusions Different conceptual representations and the use of different key features might be a cause for inconsistent definitions of feedback. The characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of this research‐based operational definition are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Feedback helps students make sense of their learning and compare their performance against a recognized standard. 1-3”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Behavior, Purpose and Teleology
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/286788 · Cited by 1,624
The New Encyclopaedia Britannica
Goetz, P. W. (1991) · Cited by 1,592
Feedback in Clinical Medical Education
Ende, J. (1983) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340060055026 · Cited by 1,259
Ramaprasad, A. (1983) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830280103 · Cited by 915
SMITHER, J. W., LONDON, M., & REILLY, R. R. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x · Cited by 601
Marital Therapy Strategies Based On Social Learning & Behavior Exchange Principles
Jacobson, N. S., & Margolin, G. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 551
Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings
Irby, D. M. (1995) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199510000-00014 · Cited by 508
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Sheenan TJ, 1984, Feedback: giving and receiving, J Med Educ, 59, 913
- Isaacson JH, 1995, Resident perception of the evaluation process, J Gen Intern Med, 10, 89
- Oxford English Dictionary Online
- Good CV, 1973, Dictionary of Education, 227
- Weiner N, 1950, The Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society
- Nadler DA, 1977, Feedback and Organisational Development: Using Data‐based Methods
- 10.1007/978-1-4684-6328-6 · DOI
- Westberg J, 1991, A CIS Guidebook for Health Professions Teachers
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A critical review of simulation‐based medical education research: 2003–2009
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x · Cited by 1,733
Self-citationSimulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82
Motola, I., Devine, L., Chung, H. S., Sullivan, J. E., & Issenberg, S. B. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.818632 · Cited by 1,223
“Van de Ridder and colleagues operationalize the definition of feedback in clinical education as ‘‘ specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance ’’ (Van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundThe role of assessment in competency-based medical education
Holmboe, E. S., Sherbino, J., Long, D. M., Swing, S. R., Frank, J. R., & Collaborators, F. T. I. C. (2010) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2010.500704 · Cited by 956
“Feedback in clinical education is a complex process involving specific skills that must be tightly integrated into the assessment system (van der Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundDebriefing as Formative Assessment: Closing Performance Gaps in Medical Education
Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Raemer, D. B., & Eppich, W. (2008) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00248.x · Cited by 825
“For feedback to be helpful it must be accurate and timely.(21,38,39) Note that in Step 2, depicted in Table 2, the instructor expresses her concern directly, respectfully (i.”
BackgroundAcademic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice
Artino, A. R. (2012) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5 · Cited by 859
“Honest, explicit feedback, in the form of verbal persuasion and/or rewards that are given contingent upon performance, provides efficacy information to learners and encourages their continued movement toward goal attainment [17, 18].”
Backgroundten Cate, O. T. J., Kusurkar, R. A., & Williams, G. C. (2011) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2011.595435 · Cited by 697
Sawyer, T., Eppich, W., Brett-Fleegler, M. B., Grant, V. J., & Cheng, A. (2016) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000148 · Cited by 693
Computerized Virtual Patients in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Cook, D. A., Erwin, P. J., & Triola, M. M. (2010) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181edfe13 · Cited by 570
“Frameworks such as multimedia learning, 96,97 analytical and nonanalytical reasoning, 19 deliberate practice, 98 and formative feedback 99,100 may be useful.”
BackgroundThe “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education.
Telio, S., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2015) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000560 · Cited by 572
Cheng, A., Nadkarni, V., Mancini, M. B., Hunt, E. A., Sinz, E. H., Merchant, R. M., Donoghue, A. J., Duff, J. P., Eppich, W., Auerbach, M. A., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000583 · Cited by 461
Mastery Learning for Health Professionals Using Technology-Enhanced Simulation
Cook, D. A., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Hamstra, S. J., & Hatala, R. A. (2013) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31829a365d · Cited by 388
“Feedback plays an essential role in learning 38 and is critical to the mastery learning model.”
BackgroundGuidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education.
Lefroy, J., Watling, C., Teunissen, P. W., & Brand, P. (2015) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7 · Cited by 347
Bhanji, F., Donoghue, A. J., Wolff, M., Flores, G. E., Halamek, L. P., Berman, J. M., Sinz, E. H., & Cheng, A. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000268 · Cited by 334
Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard I: Terminology
Meakim, C. H., Boese, T., Decker, S., Franklin, A. E., Gloe, D. S., Lioce, L., Sando, C. R., & Borum, J. C. (2013) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.001 · Cited by 349
Feedback for learners in medical education: What is known? A scoping review.
Bing-You, R., Hayes, V., Varaklis, K., Trowbridge, R., Kemp, H., & McKelvy, D. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001578 · Cited by 256
Gardner, R. (2013) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2013.02.008 · Cited by 288
“Feedback should convey specific information about observed performance compared to a standard, given with the intent to improve the participants’ performance.(6) However, these sessions were based on subjective opinion, focused on error, largely negative and poorly received by members of the unit.”
Motivation in medical education
Pelaccia, T., & Viau, R. (2016) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2016.1248924 · Cited by 223
“Motivating feedback should also be constructive and not threatening, i.e. it must target learning questions and focus on how to help the student during the next stages of his training, and not on the person himself (Van de Ridder et al. 2008; Kusurkar, Croiset, et al. 2011).”
BackgroundObjective Structured Assessment of Debriefing
Arora, S., Ahmed, M., Paige, J. T., Nestel, D., Runnacles, J., Hull, L., Darzi, A. W., & Sevdalis, N. (2012) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182610c91 · Cited by 206
Ramani, S., Könings, K. D., Ginsburg, S., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2018) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2018.1432850 · Cited by 216
“Newer definitions of effective feedback emphasize learner self-assessment, behavior change and professional growth (van de Ridder et al. 2008; Bing-You and Trowbridge 2009; Delva et al. 2011; Molloy and Boud 2013; Boud 2015).”
Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills
Kogan, J. R., Conforti, L. N., Bernabeo, E. C., Durning, S. J., Hauer, K. E., & Holmboe, E. S. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04137.x · Cited by 180
Giving feedback – An integral part of education
Schartel, S. A. (2012) · Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2012.02.003 · Cited by 195
Clarifying students’ feedback‐seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships
Bok, H. G. J., Teunissen, P. W., Spruijt, A., Fokkema, J. P. I., van Beukelen, P., Jaarsma, D. A. D. C., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12054 · Cited by 155
van de Ridder, J. M. M., McGaghie, W. C., Stokking, K. M., & ten Cate, O. T. J. (2015) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12744 · Cited by 154
Self-citationTeunissen, P. W., Stapel, D. A., van der Vleuten, C., Scherpbier, A., Boor, K., & Scheele, F. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181a858ad · Cited by 151
Improving Teacher Feedback During Active Learning
van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2014) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831214531322 · Cited by 153
“As stated in the introduction, feedback is defined as ‘‘specific information about the comparison between a student’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the student’s performance’’ (Van de Ridder et al., 2008, p. 193).”
BackgroundInfluentialBokken, L., Linssen, T., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Rethans, J. (2009) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03268.x · Cited by 144
Delany, C. M., & Golding, C. (2014) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-20 · Cited by 160
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice
Harvey, M., & Luzia, K. (2013) · Cited by 141
Ramani, S., Post, S. E., Könings, K., Mann, K., Katz, J. T., & van der Vleuten, C. (2017) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2016.1244014 · Cited by 138
Shame, guilt, and the medical learner: ignored connections and why we should care
Bynum, W. E., & Goodie, J. L. (2014) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12521 · Cited by 142
Barriers to the uptake and use of feedback in the context of summative assessment
Harrison, C., Könings, K. D., Schuwirth, L., Wass, V., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2014) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9524-6 · Cited by 152
“The importance and potential power of feedback is well-established, both in general educational settings and in relation to the health care professions (Hattie and Timperley 2007; Shute 2008; van de Ridder et al. 2008; Archer 2010).”
BackgroundArtino, A. R., Holmboe, E. S., & Durning, S. J. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.651515 · Cited by 151
“A second strategy for boosting students’ self-efficacy for learning is to provide them with timely, honest, and explicit feedback (Bandura 1997; Hattie & Timperley 2007; van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundCheng, A., Grant, V. J., Huffman, J., Burgess, G., Szyld, D., Robinson, T., & Eppich, W. (2017) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000232 · Cited by 136
Ramani, S., Könings, K. D., Mann, K. V., Pisarski, E. E., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2018) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002193 · Cited by 132
Saedon, H., Salleh, S., Balakrishnan, A., Imray, C., & Saedon, M. H. (2012) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-12-25 · Cited by 124
Identifying coaching skills to improve feedback use in postgraduate medical education
Armson, H., Lockyer, J. M., Zetkulic, M., Könings, K. D., & Sargeant, J. (2019) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13818 · Cited by 115
Bing‐You, R. G., Varaklis, K., Hayes, V., Trowbridge, R. L., Kemp, H., & McKelvy, D. J. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001927 · Cited by 131
A meta-review of the student role in feedback
der Kleij, F. M. V., Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.005 · Cited by 150
Hauer, K. E., Holmboe, E. S., & Kogan, J. R. (2011) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2010.507710 · Cited by 118
Reddy, S. T., Zegarek, M. H., Fromme, H. B., Ryan, M. S., Schumann, S.-A., & Harris, I. B. (2015) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-14-00461.1 · Cited by 120
Atkinson, A. R., Watling, C., & Brand, P. L. P. (2021) · European Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s00431-021-04118-8 · Cited by 133
Progressive Entrustment to Achieve Resident Autonomy in the Operating Room
Sandhu, G., Magas, C. P., Robinson, A. B., Scally, C. P., & Minter, R. M. (2016) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000001782 · Cited by 117
Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice
Ramani, S., Könings, K. D., Ginsburg, S., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04874-2 · Cited by 139
Identifying best practice guidelines for debriefing in surgery: a tri-continental study
Ahmed, M., Sevdalis, N., Paige, J. T., Paragi-Gururaja, R., Nestel, D., & Arora, S. (2012) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.024 · Cited by 112
Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2018) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13746 · Cited by 109
Johnson, C., Keating, J. L., Boud, D. J., Dalton, M., Kiegaldie, D., Hay, M., McGrath, B. P., McKenzie, W. A., Nair, K., Nestel, D., et al. (2016) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0613-5 · Cited by 108
Tavares, W., Eppich, W., Cheng, A., Miller, S. G., Teunissen, P. W., Watling, C., & Sargeant, J. M. (2019) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002932 · Cited by 100
Bowen, L., Marshall, M., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001632 · Cited by 99
Believing is seeing: how people's beliefs influence goals, emotions and behaviour
Teunissen, P. W., & Bok, H. G. J. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12228 · Cited by 99
Rudolph, J. W., Foldy, E. G., Robinson, T., Kendall, S., Taylor, S. S., & Simon, R. (2013) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0b013e318294854e · Cited by 104
Hawkins, S. C., Osborne, A., Schofield, S. J., Pournaras, D. J., & Chester, J. F. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.658897 · Cited by 93
“Thinking on your feet”—a qualitative study of debriefing practice
Krogh, K., Bearman, M., & Nestel, D. (2016) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0011-4 · Cited by 96
“The literature also outlines many approaches to debriefing [13–21].”
BackgroundStudy on Clinical Education for Nursing in Hospitals in Korea
Song, J., & Kim, M.-W. (2013) · The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education · doi:10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.2.251 · Cited by 84
Framing of feedback impacts student’s satisfaction, self-efficacy and performance
van de Ridder, J. M. M., Peters, C. M. M., Stokking, K. M., de Ru, J. A., & ten Cate, O. (2014) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9567-8 · Cited by 90
Self-citationMaking sense of feedback experiences: a multi‐school study of medical students' narratives
Urquhart, L. M., Rees, C. E., & Ker, J. S. (2014) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12304 · Cited by 83
Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students’ perceptions about feedback.
Murdoch‐Eaton, D., & Sargeant, J. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04291.x · Cited by 83
Primer on Preclinical Instruction and Evaluation
Hauser, A. M., & Bowen, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.3.tb04711.x · Cited by 82
A Practical Review of Mastery Learning
Winget, M. D., & Persky, A. M. (2022) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe8906 · Cited by 116
Teacher feedback during active learning: Current practices in primary schools
van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2012) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02073.x · Cited by 79
Teacher learning in the context of a continuing professional development programme: A case study
van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2015) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.002 · Cited by 79
Plakht, Y., Shiyovich, A., Nusbaum, L., & Raizer, H. (2012) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.017 · Cited by 78
Pedagogical strategies used in clinical medical education: an observational study
Nilsson, M. S., Pennbrant, S., Pilhammar, E., & Wenestam, C. (2010) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-10-9 · Cited by 70
Feedback providers’ credibility impacts students’ satisfaction with feedback and delayed performance
van de Ridder, J. M. M., Berk, F. C. J., Stokking, K. M., & ten Cate, O. (2014) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2014.970617 · Cited by 69
“If done well, feedback providers observe students’ task performances, to compare this with implicit or explicit standards, and based on this comparison give feedback often with the intention to improve skills or behavior (van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBroadening the Scope of Feedback to Promote Its Relevance to Workplace Learning
van der Leeuw, R. M., Teunissen, P. W., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001962 · Cited by 69
The Quality of Written Feedback by Attendings of Internal Medicine Residents
Jackson, J. L., Kay, C., Jackson, W., & Frank, M. (2015) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3237-2 · Cited by 68
“Several papers have provided opinions on improving feedback quality.(2,4,11,22,23) For example, Skeff characterized high-quality feedback as specific, emphasizing behavior, frequent, selective, timely, balanced, tailored to the learning climate, interactive, labeled as feedback, and resulting in an action plan for imp…”
BackgroundSimulated patient’s feedback to improve communication skills of clerkship students
Qureshi, A. A., & Zehra, T. (2020) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1914-2 · Cited by 67
The one-minute preceptor model: A systematic review
Gatewood, E., & Gagne, J. C. D. (2018) · Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1097/jxx.0000000000000099 · Cited by 66
Debriefing for the Transfer of Learning: The Importance of Context
Rivière, É., Jaffrelot, M., Jouquan, J., & Chiniara, G. (2019) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002612 · Cited by 78
Real-Time Debriefing After Critical Events
Arriaga, A. F., Szyld, D., & Pian-Smith, M. C. M. (2020) · Anesthesiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2020.08.003 · Cited by 69
Nurse students learning acute care by simulation – Focus on observation and debriefing
Abelsson, A., & Bisholt, B. K. M. (2017) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2017.03.001 · Cited by 69
“The intention was to improve the understanding of concepts or aspects of performance (Van de Ridder et al., 2008; Meakim et al., 2013).”
BackgroundHunt, E. A., Fiedor, M., & Eppich, W. (2008) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2008.04.007 · Cited by 65
Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy
Burgess, A. W., Roberts, C., Lane, S., Haq, I., Clark, T., Kalman, E., Pappalardo, N., & Bleasel, J. F. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02821-6 · Cited by 70
“Evidence suggests that with adequate training, the practice of providing and receiving feedback provides an effective learning experience that encourages self-reflection [6, 7, 28, 29].”
BackgroundCanavan, C., Holtman, M. C., Richmond, M., & Katsufrakis, P. J. (2010) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181ed4cdb · Cited by 62
Runnacles, J., Thomas, L., Sevdalis, N., Kneebone, R. L., Arora, S., & Cooper, M. (2014) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131676 · Cited by 61
Burgess, A. W., Roberts, C., Black, K. I., & Mellis, C. (2013) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-79 · Cited by 61
Why receiving feedback collides with self determination
ten Cate, O. (2012) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9401-0 · Cited by 65
“In the clinical settings, adequate feedback is considered essential for the progress of trainees (Ende 1983; Kilminster and Jolly 2000; Van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundKim, E. J., & Lee, K. R. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1595-x · Cited by 67
Ba, H., zhang, L., & Yi, Z. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05565-1 · Cited by 58
“Furthermore, the on-site, real-time feedback from evaluators is likely instrumental in consolidating clinical skillsets, echoing findings on the potency of immediate feedback in clinical education [15, 16].”
BackgroundPerceptions of quality of feedback in organizations
Mulder, R. H., & Ellinger, A. D. (2013) · European journal of training and development · doi:10.1108/03090591311293266 · Cited by 57
Emotion as reflexive practice: A new discourse for feedback practice and research
Ajjawi, R., Olson, R. E., & McNaughton, N. (2021) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14700 · Cited by 55
Sarkany, D., & Deitte, L. A. (2017) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.023 · Cited by 59
Dekker, H., Schönrock-Adema, J., Snoek, J. W., van der Molen, T., & Cohen‐Schotanus, J. (2013) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-94 · Cited by 55
Mentoring portfolio use in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education
Dekker, H., Driessen, E. W., ter Braak, E. W. M. T., Scheele, F., Slaets, J. P. J., van der Molen, T., & Cohen‐Schotanus, J. (2009) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/01421590903173697 · Cited by 55
“The most frequently reported mentoring aim was ‘providing feedback’, which is in line with the widely acknowledged opinion that feedback is the driving force behind improvement (Kluger & DeNisi 1996; Hattie & Timperley 2007; Van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
ResultBulfone, G., Vellone, E., Maurici, M., Macale, L., & Alvaro, R. (2019) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14226 · Cited by 54
Prakash, S., Sladek, R., & Schuwirth, L. (2018) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2018.1497786 · Cited by 53
“Feedback is defined as ‘specific information about the comparison between a trainee’s observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee’s performance’ (Van de Ridder et al. 2008).”
BackgroundChou, C. L., Masters, D. E., Chang, A., Kruidering, M., & Hauer, K. E. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12246 · Cited by 53
Actual vs perceived performance debriefing in surgery: practice far from perfect
Ahmed, M., Sevdalis, N., Vincent, C. A., & Arora, S. (2013) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.007 · Cited by 53
Schopper, H. K., Rosenbaum, M., & Axelson, R. D. (2016) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0813-z · Cited by 53
“This would be in keeping with more general recommendations in the literature that to be an effective learning tool focused on learner improvement, feedback (formative evaluation) should be distinct rather than equivalent to summative evaluation [14, 18, 22].”
ResultDisparities in Feedback Provision to Emergency Medical Services Professionals
Cash, R. E., Crowe, R. P., Rodriguez, S. A., & Panchal, A. R. (2017) · Prehospital Emergency Care · doi:10.1080/10903127.2017.1328547 · Cited by 53
AI or Human? Evaluating Student Feedback Perceptions in Higher Education
Nazaretsky, T., Mejia-Domenzain, P., Swamy, V., Frej, J., & Käser, T. (2024) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72315-5_20 · Cited by 76
Daud, A., Matoug‐Elwerfelli, M., Daas, H. I., Zahra, D., & Ali, K. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04904-y · Cited by 52
Gender differences in self‐assessed clinical competence– a survey of young dentists in F inland
Karaharju‐Suvanto, T., Näpänkangas, R., Koivumäki, J., Pyörälä, E., & Vinkka‐Puhakka, H. (2014) · European Journal Of Dental Education · doi:10.1111/eje.12092 · Cited by 51
Freytag, J., Stroben, F., Hautz, W. E., Eisenmann, D., & Kämmer, J. E. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015977 · Cited by 51
Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators
Engerer, C., Berberat, P. O., Dinkel, A., Rudolph, B., Sattel, H. C., & Wünsch, A. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1470-9 · Cited by 54
Clinical skills‐related learning goals of senior medical students after performance feedback
Chang, A., Chou, C. L., Teherani, A., & Hauer, K. E. (2011) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04015.x · Cited by 50
Weallans, J., Roberts, C., Hamilton, S. J., & Parker, S. (2021) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139566 · Cited by 55
The criteria of constructive feedback: The feedback that counts
Omer, A. A. A., & Abdularhim, M. (2017) · Journal of health specialties · doi:10.4103/2468-6360.198798 · Cited by 49
Ötleş, E., Kendrick, D. E., Solano, Q. P., Schuller, M. C., Ahle, S. L., Eskender, M. H., Carnes, E., & George, B. C. (2021) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000004153 · Cited by 50
Tejos, R., Crovari, F. J., Achurra, P., Ávila, R., Inzunza, M., Jarry, C., Martínez, J., Riquelme, A. J., Alseidi, A. A., & Varas, J. (2020) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-020-05766-x · Cited by 46
The Concept of Self-Directed Learning: Implications for Practice in the Undergraduate Curriculum
Anshu, Gupta, P., & Singh, T. (2022) · Indian Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s13312-022-2501-x · Cited by 49
“It is here that honest and explicit feedback helps them understand the reasons for their success or failures better, and this enhances their self-efficacy belief [35,36].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Van De Ridder, J. M. M., Stokking, K. M., McGaghie, W. C., & Ten Cate, O. T. J.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Northwestern University (US)
- ORCID
- McGaghie, William C
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-22
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-197
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W1807214239
- Semantic Scholar
- e411b553fd3fa2a57ef58d5fd2f19a8d83f555a4
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- feedback, clinical teaching, operational definitions, trainee performance, performance standards, teacher professional development, feedback loops
- MeSH terms
- Education, Medical, Feedback, Social Sciences, Teaching, Clinical Medicine, Observation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review