Continuity in a longitudinal out‐patient attachment for Year 3 medical students
Abstract
Context Concerns about the quality of medical student learning experiences during traditional clerkships have prompted calls to restructure clinical education around continuity. Many US medical schools have added longitudinal out‐patient attachments to enhance student continuity with patients and supervising doctors. However, continuity with patients can be difficult to achieve and little is known about the independent effect of continuity with a supervising doctor and setting. This study describes students’ perceptions of the types of continuity experienced in longitudinal attachments and the learning associated with continuity. Methods This is a qualitative study using a grounded theory approach. Interviews were conducted with 12 Year 3 medical students about their continuity experiences with patients, supervisors and settings during their attachment. The resulting data were subjected to thematic analysis. Results Continuity with supervising doctors provided students with career mentorship and personal support. Student autonomy varied and was most dependent on the supervisor and setting. Students with patient continuity were more likely to report learning about chronic illness and communication skills. Students described the longitudinal attachment as helping them to develop their clinical skills and gain self‐confidence within their role as future doctors, and as influencing their career choice. Conclusions There is much variation in student experiences of patient continuity during a longitudinal attachment. Continuity with patients, supervisors and settings affects student learning in different ways. Additional dimensions of the experience, such as the nature of the patient–doctor relationship, the pace of work and the patient population, impact learning outcomes and should be considered when continuity experiences are being designed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New education models required to achieve CBME are not well described.
“Although investigations into new education models are required to achieve CBME, these models are not well described [22,25–27].”
Cites
American Medical Education 100 Years after the Flexner Report
Cooke, M., Irby, D. M., Sullivan, W., & Ludmerer, K. M. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra055445 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Self-citationAmerican medical education 100 years after the Flexner report.
Saidi, F. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 678 · see citing works
“Continuity” as an Organizing Principle for Clinical Education Reform
Hirsh, D. A., Ogur, B., Thibault, G. E., & Cox, M. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb061660 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship: An Innovative Model of Clinical Education
Ogur, B., Hirsh, D. A., Krupat, E., & Bor, D. H. (2007) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31803338f0 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Ericsson, K. A. (2007) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02946.x · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Worley, P., Esterman, A., & Prideaux, D. J. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7433.207 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Worley, P., Prideaux, D. J., Strasser, R. P., Magarey, A., & March, R. (2006) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02366.x · Cited by 163 · see citing works
A cross-sectional descriptive study of mentoring relationships formed by medical students
Aagaard, E., & Hauer, K. E. (2003) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20334.x · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Medical students’ perceptions of mentoring: a focus-group analysis
Hauer, K. E., Teherani, A., Dechet, A. M., & Aagaard, E. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500271316 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Bell, S. K., Krupat, E., Fazio, S. B., Roberts, D. H., & Schwartzstein, R. M. (2008) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31816bdad5 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Documenting and Comparing Medical Students' Clinical Experiences
Rattner, S. L. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.9.1035 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Evidence for Longitudinal Ambulatory Care Rotations: A Review of the Literature
Ogrinc, G., Mutha, S., & Irby, D. M. (2002) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200207000-00008 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Student learning experiences in a longitudinal clerkship programme
Mihalynuk, T. V., Bates, J., Page, G., & Fraser, J. (2008) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03040.x · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Carney, P. A., Ogrinc, G. S., Harwood, B. G., et al. (2005) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200512000-00021 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
LEWIN, L. O., Papp, K. K., Hodder, S., Workings, M. G., Wolfe, L., Glover, P. B., & Headrick, L. A. (1999) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199901001-00037 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Teaching Medical Students about Continuity of Patient Care
Vogt, H. B., Lindemann, J. C., & Hearns, V. L. (2000) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200001000-00015 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Structuring student learning in the primary care setting: where is the evidence?
Kurth, R. J., Irigoyen, M. M., & Schmidt, H. J. (2001) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00288.x · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Teaching Care Management in a Longitudinal Primary Care Clerkship
Peters, A. S., Schnaidt, K. N., Seward, S. J., et al. (2005) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm1704_2 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gonzalo, J. D., Wolpaw, D. R., Krok, K. L., Pfeiffer, M. P., & McCall-Hosenfeld, J. S. (2019) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2019.1591256 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wamsley, M. A., Dubowitz, N., Kohli, P., Cooke, M., & O’Brien, B. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wamsley, Maria A
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-08-20
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 895-906
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2102455794
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- continuity of care, medical students, clinical rotations, supervising physicians, student independence, career mentorship, chronic disease, communication skills, clinical skills development, self-confidence, career choice, student perceptions
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Clerkship, Clinical Competence, Continuity of Patient Care, Humans, Medical Staff, Hospital, Mentors, Outpatient Clinics, Hospital, Physician-Patient Relations, San Francisco, Students, Medical, Professional Autonomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
