Cited by 811Personality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?

Marsh, Herbert W.·1996·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Global self-esteem based on M. Rosenberg's (1965) scale is typically treated as a unidimensional scale. However, factor analyses suggest separate factors associated with positively and negatively worded items, and there is an ongoing debate about the substantive meaningfulness of this distinction. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate alternative 1- and 2-factor models and to test hypotheses about how the factors vary with reading ability and age. Responses based on the National Longitudinal Study of 1988 (S.J. Ingles et al., 1992) reflected a relatively unidimensional factor and method effects associated with negatively worded items. Such effects are common in rating scale responses, and this CFA approach may be useful in evaluating whether factors associated with positively and negatively worded items are substantively meaningful or artifactors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.810

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The two-factor structure obtained in the EFA is due to artifacts caused by the characteristics of the Japanese language (method effects).

    “The results of the exploratory factor analysis were considered to be due to artifacts caused by the characteristics of the Japanese language.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsh, H. W.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Marsh, Herbert W.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1996
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
810-819
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4237817862
Cited by
811
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 41
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
global self-esteem, positive self-esteem, negative self-esteem, self-esteem measurement, measurement artifacts, self-concept
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Educational Status, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personality Development, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Reading, Self Concept, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review