Cited by 351Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

A dwarf galaxy remnant in Canis Major: the fossil of an in-plane accretion on to the Milky Way

Open access
Martin, N. F., Ibata, R. A., Bellazzini, M., Irwin, M. J., Lewis, G. F., Dehnen, W.·2004·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present an analysis of the asymmetries in the population of Galactic M-giant stars present in the 2MASS All Sky catalogue. Several large-scale asymmetries are detected, the most significant of which is a strong elliptical-shaped stellar overdensity, close to the Galactic plane at (ℓ= 240°, b=−8°), in the constellation of Canis Major. A small grouping of globular clusters (NGC 1851, 1904, 2298 and 2808), coincident in position and radial velocity, surround this structure, as do a number of open clusters. The population of M-giant stars in this overdensity is similar in number to that in the core of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy. We argue that this object is the likely dwarf galaxy progenitor of the ring-like structure that has recently been found at the edge of the Galactic disc. A numerical study of the tidal disruption of an accreted dwarf galaxy is presented. The simulated debris fits the extant position, distance and velocity information on the Galactic ‘Ring’, as well as that of the M-giant overdensities, suggesting that all these structures are the consequence of a single accretion event. The disrupted dwarf galaxy stream orbits close to the Galactic plane, with a pericentre at approximately the solar circle, an orbital eccentricity similar to that of stars in the Galactic thick disc, as well as a vertical scaleheight similar to that of the thick disc. This finding strongly suggests that the Canis Major dwarf galaxy is a building block of the Galactic thick disc, that the thick disc is continually growing, even up to the present time, and that thick disc globular clusters were accreted on to the Milky Way from dwarf galaxies in co-planar orbits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07331.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bellazzini M., Ibata R., Ferraro F. R., 2003c, in Satellites and Tidal Tails, D. Martinez-delgado and F. Prada Eds., S. Francisco, ASP, ASP Conf. Series, in press astro-ph/0304502 · arXiv
  2. Majewski S., Skrutskie M., Weinberg M. & Ostheimer J. 2003, astro-ph/0304198 · arXiv
  3. Martin, N. (2003), DEA thesis, Universit´ e de Strasbourg

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, N. F., Ibata, R. A., Bellazzini, M., Irwin, M. J., Lewis, G. F., & Dehnen, W.
Affiliations
  • Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg (FR)
  • Osservatorio astronomico di Bologna (IT)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Ibata, R. A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2004-02
Volume
348
Issue
1
Pages
12-23
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2153434629
Cited by
351
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
26.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Sagittarius dwarf galaxy, M giant stars, stellar overdensities, globular clusters, open clusters, tidal disruption, ring structure, dwarf galaxy progenitor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review