The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we present a clustering analysis of quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) using over 20000 objects from the final catalogue of the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey (2QZ), measuring the redshift-space two-point correlation function, ξ(s). When averaged over the redshift range 0.3 < z < 2.2 we find that ξ(s) is flat on small scales, steepening on scales above ∼25h−1 Mpc. In a WMAP/2dF cosmology (Ωm = 0.27, ΩΛ = 0.73) we find a best-fitting power law with s0 = 5.48+0.42−0.48h−1 Mpc and γ= 1.20 ± 0.10 on scales s = 1 to 25h−1 Mpc. We demonstrate that non-linear redshift-space distortions have a significant effect on the QSO ξ(s) at scales less than ∼10h−1 Mpc. A cold dark matter model assuming WMAP/2dF cosmological parameters is a good description of the QSO ξ(s) after accounting for non-linear clustering and redshift-space distortions, and allowing for a linear bias at the mean redshift of bQ(z = 1.35) = 2.02 ± 0.07. We subdivide the 2QZ into 10 redshift intervals with effective redshifts from z = 0.53 to 2.48. We find a significant increase in clustering amplitude at high redshift in the WMAP/2dF cosmology. The QSO clustering amplitude increases with redshift such that the integrated correlation function, , within 20h−1 Mpc is and . We derive the QSO bias and find it to be a strong function of redshift with bQ(z = 0.53) = 1.13 ± 0.18 and bQ(z = 2.48) = 4.24 ± 0.53. We use these bias values to derive the mean dark matter halo (DMH) mass occupied by the QSOs. At all redshifts 2QZ QSOs inhabit approximately the same mass DMHs with MDH = (3.0 ± 1.6) × 1012h−1 M⊙, which is close to the characteristic mass in the Press–Schechter mass function, M*, at z = 0. These results imply that L*Q QSOs at z∼ 0 should be largely unbiased. If the relation between black hole (BH) mass and MDH or host velocity dispersion does not evolve, then we find that the accretion efficiency (L/LEdd) for L*Q QSOs is approximately constant with redshift. Thus the fading of the QSO population from z∼ 2 to ∼0 appears to be due to less massive BHs being active at low redshift. We apply different methods to estimate, tQ, the active lifetime of QSOs and constrain tQ to be in the range 4 × 106–6 × 108 yr at z∼ 2. We test for any luminosity dependence of QSO clustering by measuring ξ(s) as a function of apparent magnitude (equivalent to luminosity relative to L*Q). However, we find no significant evidence of luminosity-dependent clustering from this data set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Cited by
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,629
Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., Di Matteo, T., Robertson, B., & Springel, V. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/499298 · Cited by 1,873
Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
Clustering of High-Redshift (z≥ 2.9) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Shen, Y., Strauss, M. A., Oguri, M., Hennawi, J. F., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Gunn, J. E., Schneider, D. P., Szalay, A. S., et al. (2007) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/513517 · Cited by 384
THE SDSS-III BARYON OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY: QUASAR TARGET SELECTION FOR DATA RELEASE NINE
Ross, N. P., Myers, A. D., Sheldon, E. S., Yèche, C., Strauss, M. A., Bovy, J., Kirkpatrick, J. A., Richards, G. T., Aubourg, É., Blanton, M. R., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/199/1/3 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Croom, S. M., Boyle, B. J., Shanks, T., Smith, R. J., Miller, L., Outram, P. J., Loaring, N. S., Hoyle, F., & da Ângela, J.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 415-438
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2148567160
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08379.x
- The paper
- Croom, S. M., Boyle, B. J., Shanks, T., Smith, R. J., Miller, L., Outram, P. J., Loaring, N. S., Hoyle, F., & da Ângela, J. (2005). The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08379.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.