Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function

Open access
Croom, Scott M., Boyle, B. J., Shanks, T., Smith, R. J., Miller, L., Outram, P. J., Loaring, N. S., Hoyle, F., da Ângela, J.·2005·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

In this paper we present a clustering analysis of quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) using over 20000 objects from the final catalogue of the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey (2QZ), measuring the redshift-space two-point correlation function, ξ(s). When averaged over the redshift range 0.3 < z < 2.2 we find that ξ(s) is flat on small scales, steepening on scales above ∼25h−1 Mpc. In a WMAP/2dF cosmology (Ωm = 0.27, ΩΛ = 0.73) we find a best-fitting power law with s0 = 5.48+0.42−0.48h−1 Mpc and γ= 1.20 ± 0.10 on scales s = 1 to 25h−1 Mpc. We demonstrate that non-linear redshift-space distortions have a significant effect on the QSO ξ(s) at scales less than ∼10h−1 Mpc. A cold dark matter model assuming WMAP/2dF cosmological parameters is a good description of the QSO ξ(s) after accounting for non-linear clustering and redshift-space distortions, and allowing for a linear bias at the mean redshift of bQ(z = 1.35) = 2.02 ± 0.07. We subdivide the 2QZ into 10 redshift intervals with effective redshifts from z = 0.53 to 2.48. We find a significant increase in clustering amplitude at high redshift in the WMAP/2dF cosmology. The QSO clustering amplitude increases with redshift such that the integrated correlation function, , within 20h−1 Mpc is and . We derive the QSO bias and find it to be a strong function of redshift with bQ(z = 0.53) = 1.13 ± 0.18 and bQ(z = 2.48) = 4.24 ± 0.53. We use these bias values to derive the mean dark matter halo (DMH) mass occupied by the QSOs. At all redshifts 2QZ QSOs inhabit approximately the same mass DMHs with MDH = (3.0 ± 1.6) × 1012h−1 M⊙, which is close to the characteristic mass in the Press–Schechter mass function, M*, at z = 0. These results imply that L*Q QSOs at z∼ 0 should be largely unbiased. If the relation between black hole (BH) mass and MDH or host velocity dispersion does not evolve, then we find that the accretion efficiency (L/LEdd) for L*Q QSOs is approximately constant with redshift. Thus the fading of the QSO population from z∼ 2 to ∼0 appears to be due to less massive BHs being active at low redshift. We apply different methods to estimate, tQ, the active lifetime of QSOs and constrain tQ to be in the range 4 × 106–6 × 108 yr at z∼ 2. We test for any luminosity dependence of QSO clustering by measuring ξ(s) as a function of apparent magnitude (equivalent to luminosity relative to L*Q). However, we find no significant evidence of luminosity-dependent clustering from this data set.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08379.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Croom, S. M., Boyle, B. J., Shanks, T., Smith, R. J., Miller, L., Outram, P. J., Loaring, N. S., Hoyle, F., & da Ângela, J.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2005-01
Volume
356
Issue
2
Pages
415-438
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2148567160
Cited by
393
References
3
FWCI
15.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08379.x
The paper
Croom, S. M., Boyle, B. J., Shanks, T., Smith, R. J., Miller, L., Outram, P. J., Loaring, N. S., Hoyle, F., & da Ângela, J. (2005). The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08379.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.