The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observed fractions of core-collapse supernova types and initial masses of their single and binary progenitor stars: Core-collapse supernova fractions
Open accessAbstract
We analyse the observed fractions of core-collapse supernova (SN) types from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search (LOSS), and we discuss the corresponding implications for massive star evolution. For a standard initial mass function, observed fractions of SN types cannot be reconciled with the expectations of single-star evolution. The mass range of Wolf–Rayet (WR) stars that shed their hydrogen envelopes via their own mass-loss accounts for less than half of the observed fraction of Type Ibc supernovae (SNe Ibc). The true progenitors of SNe Ibc must extend to a much lower range of initial masses than classical WR stars, and we argue that most SN Ibc and SN IIb progenitors must arise from binary Roche lobe overflow. In this scenario, SNe Ic would still trace higher initial mass and metallicity, because line-driven winds in the WR stage remove the helium layer and propel the transition from SN Ib to Ic. Less massive progenitors of SNe Ib and IIb may not be classical WR stars; they may be underluminous with weak winds, possibly hidden by overluminous mass-gainer companions that could appear as B[e] supergiants or related objects having aspherical circumstellar material. The remaining SN types (II-P, II-L and IIn) need to be redistributed across the full range of initial masses, so that even some very massive single stars retain H envelopes until explosion. We consider the possibility of direct collapse to black holes without visible SNe, but find this hypothesis difficult to accommodate in most scenarios. Major areas of remaining uncertainty are (1) the detailed influence of binary separation, rotation and metallicity; (2) mass differences in progenitors of SNe IIn compared to SNe II-L and II-P; and (3) the fraction of SNe Ic arising from single stars with the help of eruptive mass-loss, how this depends on metallicity and how it relates to diversity within the SN Ic subclass. Continued studies of progenitor stars and their environments in nearby galaxies, accounting for SN types, may eventually test these ideas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution.
Salpeter, E. E. (1955) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/145971 · Cited by 8,697
The evolution and explosion of massive stars
Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 · Cited by 2,247
How Massive Single Stars End Their Life
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., Langer, N., & Hartmann, D. H. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375341 · Cited by 2,165
Filippenko, A. V. (1997) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 · Cited by 1,824
Self-citationThe Supernova–Gamma-Ray Burst Connection
Woosley, S. E., & Bloom, J. S. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150558 · Cited by 1,766
Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae
Smartt, S. J. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101737 · Cited by 1,231
Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., & Cassinelli, J. P. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175012 · Cited by 1,046
A Universal Stellar Initial Mass Function? A Critical Look at Variations
Bastian, N., Covey, K. R., & Meyer, M. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101642 · Cited by 1,004
Physical Properties of Wolf-Rayet Stars
Crowther, P. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615 · Cited by 990
Cited by
Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., Langer, N., Evans, C. J., Gieles, M., Gosset, E., Izzard, R. G., Le Bouquin, J.-B., & Schneider, F. R. N. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223344 · Cited by 2,118
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Smith, N. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025 · Cited by 1,042
“There have been a number of physical mechanisms discussed in connection with LBVs, recently reviewed in detail by Smith et al. (2011a).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationWillett, K. W., Lintott, C. J., Bamford, S. P., Masters, K. L., Simmons, B. D., Casteels, K. R. V., Edmondson, E. M., Fortson, L. F., Kaviraj, S., Keel, W. C., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1458 · Cited by 659
Quataert, E., & Shiode, J. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01264.x · Cited by 366
PROPER IMAGE SUBTRACTION—OPTIMAL TRANSIENT DETECTION, PHOTOMETRY, AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Zackay, B., Ofek, E. O., & Gal-Yam, A. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/1/27 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, N., Li, W., Filippenko, A. V., & Chornock, R.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-03-16
- Volume
- 412
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1522-1538
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2949096495
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 26.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observed fractions of core-collapse supernova types and initial masses of their single and binary progenitor stars: Core-collapse supernova fractions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.17229.x
- The paper
- Smith, N., Li, W., Filippenko, A. V., & Chornock, R. (2011). Observed fractions of core-collapse supernova types and initial masses of their single and binary progenitor stars: Core-collapse supernova fractions. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.17229.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.