The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
VARIATIONS IN THE HUMAN PURKINJE CELL POPULATION ACCORDING TO AGE AND SEX
Abstract
Systematic measurements and Purkinje cell counts have been made on ninety ‘normal’ cerebella. Forty‐eight were male, forty‐two were female. Both hemispheres were sampled in thirty‐eight cases, giving a total of 128 hemispheres. The fresh volume of the cerebellum was measured in each specimen and corrections were made for changes in size during fixation and processing. The methods used and their rationale are described and discussed in detail. A mean of 6318 nucleolated Purkinje cells was counted in each of the 128 hemispheres. The mean length of the Purkinje cell line along which they lay was 1–5 m. Twenty‐seven binucleated Purkinje cells were seen out of the 811769 cells that were counted (about 1 per 30000); they appeared to be unrelated to age, sex or disease. The number of Purkinje cells per unit length of the Purkinje cell line and the number per unit area of the Purkinje cell sheet were found to be similar at all ages in the two sexes. Since, however, the male cerebellum tends to be larger than the female, the total number of Purkinje cells in the male is 6–8% higher than in the female. Wide individual variations were found in the same sex at all ages but a mean reduction of 2.5% per decade or of 25% over 100 years was identified. The figures suggested, however, that the reduction was curvilinear with the fall first becoming apparent at about the sixtieth year. No evidence was found that the drop was related to vascular degeneration or to any other identifiable pathological process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Decrease in human neurones with age
Gardner, E. (1940) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1090770409 · Cited by 127
Neuron numbers and perikaryon areas in the human cerebellar nuclei
Heidary, H., & Tomasch, J. (2008) · Acta Anatomica · doi:10.1159/000143382 · Cited by 45
Cited by
Neuron numbers and dendritic extent in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease
Coleman, P. D., & Flood, D. G. (1987) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/0197-4580(87)90127-8 · Cited by 772
Ball, M. J. (1977) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00692056 · Cited by 639
Whitney, E. R., Kemper, T. L., Bauman, M. L., Rosene, D. L., & Blatt, G. J. (2008) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-008-0043-y · Cited by 268
Slowing down: age-related neurobiological predictors of processing speed
Eckert, M. A. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00025 · Cited by 162
GABAergic Cerebellar System In Autism: A Neuropathological And Developmental Perspective
Blatt, G. J. (2005) · International Review of Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7742(05)71007-2 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- HALL, T. C., MILLER, A. K. H., & CORSELLIS, J. A. N.
- Venue
- Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-292
- ISSN
- 0305-1846 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2990
- OpenAlex
- W2038032519
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VARIATIONS IN THE HUMAN PURKINJE CELL POPULATION ACCORDING TO AGE AND SEX. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2990.1975.tb00652.x
- The paper
- HALL, T. C., MILLER, A. K. H., & CORSELLIS, J. A. N. (1975). VARIATIONS IN THE HUMAN PURKINJE CELL POPULATION ACCORDING TO AGE AND SEX. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.1975.tb00652.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.