Cited by 772Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Neuron numbers and dendritic extent in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease

Coleman, Paul D., Flood, Dorothy G.·1987·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Factors which limit the interpretation of studies of aging brain include: secular trends, species and strain differences, effects of tissue processing, and bias which may be introduced at many levels of an experimental design. With these limitations considered, evidence is reviewed regarding neuron numbers and dendritic extent in normally aging rodent, monkey and human brain and in Alzheimer's disease. It is concluded that neuron loss and change in dendritic extent in normal aging are regionally specific, and that corresponding brain regions do not always change in similar ways in rodents and primates. It is suggested that such differences may, in part, be due to inconsistent definitions of 'aged' among species. In Alzheimer's disease there is excess neuron loss and dendritic regression in some, but not all, brain regions. Measures of the morphological substrates of brain function show appreciable overlap between AD and control groups. It is hypothesized that the static, post-mortem status of brain morphology may not adequately reflect the functional capabilities of the dynamic morphology of the living brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0197-4580(87)90127-8

Cites

203 of 203 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuron loss is a basic and fundamental feature in the pathogenesis of AD, starting already at preclinical stages when the neuropathological hallmarks are not yet present.

    “Neuron loss is a basic and fundamental feature in the pathogenesis of AD [18,19], starting already at preclinical stages when the neuropathological hallmarks are not yet present [20].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coleman, P. D., & Flood, D. G.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-11
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
521-545
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966157184
Cited by
772
References
203
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG01121, AG03644)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
neuronal loss, normal brain aging, Alzheimer's disease, rodent brain, primate brain
MeSH terms
Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Amygdala, Animals, Brain, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Dendrites, Hippocampus, Humans, Neurons, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review