Cited by 121Autopsy Techniques and OutcomesMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsOrgan Donation and Transplantation

pH measurement as quality control on human post mortem brain tissue: a study of the BrainNet Europe consortium

Open access
Monoranu, C. M., Apfelbacher, M., Grünblatt, E., Puppe, B., Alafuzoff, I., Ferrer, I., Al‐Saraj, S., Keyvani, K. +9 more·2009·Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology

Abstract

Aims: Most brain diseases are complex entities. Although animal models or cell culture experiments mimic some disease aspects, human post mortem brain tissue remains essential to advance our understanding of brain diseases using biochemical and molecular techniques. Post mortem artefacts must be properly understood, standardized, and either eliminated or factored into such experiments. Here we examine the influence of several premortem and post mortem factors on pH, and discuss the role of pH as a biochemical marker for brain tissue quality. Methods: We assessed brain tissue pH in 339 samples from 116 brains provided by 8 different European and 2 Australian brain bank centres. We correlated brain pH with tissue source, post mortem delay, age, gender, freezing method, storage duration, agonal state and brain ischaemia. Results: Our results revealed that only prolonged agonal state and ischaemic brain damage influenced brain tissue pH next to repeated freeze/thaw cycles. Conclusions: pH measurement in brain tissue is a good indicator of premortem events in brain tissue and it signals limitations for post mortem investigations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2008.01003a.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Very few transcriptomic studies provide information on acute premortem variables or cause of death, which may potentially have a much larger effect on RNA quality and gene expression.

    “Additionally, very few transcriptomic studies provide information on acute premortem variables or cause of death, which are particularly important as they may potentially have a much larger effect on RNA quality and gene expression71–76,78–80.”

    From Dissection of artifactual and confounding glial signatures by single-cell sequencing of mouse and human brain (2022) · cites this paper as [75]

    The Introduction says agonal conditions can affect brain-tissue biochemistry and that ischaemia can alter mRNA preservation; the Discussion reports lower brain pH after a prolonged terminal phase. The paper does not establish that very few transcriptomic studies report acute premortem variables or cause of death, nor does it measure a larger effect on RNA quality or gene expression. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monoranu, C. M., Apfelbacher, M., Grünblatt, E., Puppe, B., Alafuzoff, I., Ferrer, I., Al‐Saraj, S., Keyvani, K., Schmitt, A., Falkai, P., Schittenhelm, J., Halliday, G., Kril, J., Harper, C., McLean, C., Riederer, P., & Roggendorf, W.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Pathology (TH)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • University Hospital Münster (DE)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Apfelbacher, M.
Venue
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-29
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
329-337
ISSN
  • 0305-1846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2990
OpenAlex
W1976059181
Cited by
121
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R24AA012725)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
Keywords
brain tissue pH, postmortem brain, agonal state, brain ischaemia, freeze-thaw cycles, postmortem delay, brain banks, brain disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Brain Ischemia, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Organ Preservation, Quality Control, Tissue Banks, Cryopreservation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review