The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In silico screening of a saturated mutation library of tomato
Open accessAbstract
Summary: A comprehensive mutant population is a basic resource for exploring gene function. We developed an isogenic tomato ‘mutation library’ in the genetic background of the inbred variety M82. A total of 13 000 M 2 families, derived from EMS (ethyl methane sulfonate) and fast‐neutron mutagenesis, were visually phenotyped in the field and categorized into a morphological catalog that includes 15 primary and 48 secondary categories. Currently, 3417 mutations have been cataloged; among them are most of the previously described phenotypes from the monogenic mutant collection of The Tomato Genetics Resource Center, and over a thousand new mutants, with multiple alleles per locus. The phenotypic database indicates that most mutations fall into more than a single category (pleiotropic), with some organs such as leaves more prone to alterations than others. All data and images can be searched and accessed in the Solanaceae Genome Network (SGN) on a site called ‘The Genes That Make Tomatoes’ (http://zamir.sgn.cornell.edu/mutants/).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional Characterization of the S. cerevisiae Genome by Gene Deletion and Parallel Analysis
Winzeler, E. A., Shoemaker, D. D., Astromoff, A., Liang, H., Anderson, K., Andre, B., Bangham, R., Benito, R., Boeke, J. D., Bussey, H., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5429.901 · Cited by 3,953
Cited by
Alonge, M., Lebeigle, L., Kirsche, M., Jenike, K., Ou, S., Aganezov, S., Wang, X., Lippman, Z. B., Schatz, M. C., & Soyk, S. (2022) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02823-7 · Cited by 992
Cobb, J. N., DeClerck, G., Greenberg, A., Clark, R., & McCouch, S. (2013) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-013-2066-0 · Cited by 666
Lifschitz, E., Eviatar, T., Rozman, A., Shalit, A., Goldshmidt, A., Amsellem, Z., Alvarez, J. P., & Eshed, Y. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601620103 · Cited by 630
Self-citationFruit ripening mutants yield insights into ripening control
Giovannoni, J. J. (2007) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.008 · Cited by 532
Regulation of LANCEOLATE by miR319 is required for compound-leaf development in tomato
Ori, N., Cohen, A. R., Etzioni, A., Brand, A., Yanai, O., Shleizer, S., Menda, N., Amsellem, Z., Efroni, I., Pekker, I., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2036 · Cited by 526
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Menda, N., Semel, Y., Peled, D., Eshed, Y., & Zamir, D.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04-19
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 861-872
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2169652952
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In silico screening of a saturated mutation library of tomato. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02088.x
- The paper
- Menda, N., Semel, Y., Peled, D., Eshed, Y., & Zamir, D. (2004). In silico screening of a saturated mutation library of tomato. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02088.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
